• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

What are your views on various doctrines?

Status
Not open for further replies.

banana

Member
Site Supporter
Baptist
Calvinist
Historic premillenial
Theistic Evolutionist (though I consider OEC possible)
Literary Framework interpretation of Genesis (though I consider the standard day-age OEC interpretation possible)
NA27-28 > Byzantine
Word for word > thought for thought
I'm fine with inclusive language

That is me, I think I got most things lol
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Hmmm...let's see.

Baptist
Non-Calvinist
Pre-trib, premillenial (but consider historic pre-mil to be possible)
Creationist, but undecided on age of the earth, though older than, say 100,000 years. Believe in a literal A&E
Bible translations--don't have a stance except definitely not KJVO. I like the NIV and NKJV.
Believe in a literal Hell, i.e. non-annihilationist
Giving is voluntary, don't believe in tithing, though it is a great rule of thumb

Now the important ones. :Biggrin
Contemporary Christian Music is allowed.
Open toed shoes on women are allowed
Mixed bathing is allowed
Card playing is allowed
Alcohol is allowed in moderation (though I no longer imbibe.)
Movies are allowed, but with discretion
Tattoos are allowed, just not in my family
Long hair on men is allowed, but frowned upon
Nice clothes are expected to be worn at church, but need not be a dress on women or a tie and jacket on men.

Misc.
Ram > Ford > Chevy
Android > Apple
Haagen Daz > Ben & Jerry's
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Baptist
Calvinist
Historic premillenial
Theistic Evolutionist (though I consider OEC possible)
Literary Framework interpretation of Genesis (though I consider the standard day-age OEC interpretation possible)
NA27-28 > Byzantine
Word for word > thought for thought
I'm fine with inclusive language

That is me, I think I got most things lol
Just curious, do you see Adam/Eve as special creations of God, or a product of evolution?
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Denomination - Baptist
Soteriology (Cal/non-Cal) – Classic-Calvinistic
Eschatology – Leaning to historic premil.
Creation – “literal” view (six days)
Theory of Atonement – Historical (including penal substitution)
Covenant Theology vs. Dispensationalism - Neither
Bible Translation – multiple
 

TCassidy

Late-Administator Emeritus
Administrator
Baptist
Particular Redemption
Historic Chilliast
6 literal 24 hour days of creation
Byzantine Preferred
Verbal/Formal equivalent
 

Rob_BW

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Baptist, formerly (20 years ago) Mennonite
Calvinism? When I joined here I was about a 2.5 pointer, I've probably been talked up to a 3 & 2/3 pointer since then.
Premil, undecided on pre- or mid-trib, dispy-lite.
Literal creation and hell.
I favor CT translations (HCSB, LEB) but have no beef with TR or Byz.
I prefer singing from a hymnal, but some of those songs they project on the wall are pretty catchy.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
I'm not sure actually
I had considered several interpretations, but the nature of reconciliation always brought me back to the "literal" view.

That said, I believe “non-literal” interpretations (such as theistic evolution, the gap theory) will become increasingly the dominant view as the “literal” interpretation is often considered archaic or passé to modern reasoning. Christianity always exists within a culture that “speaks another language”. Perhaps R.C .Gardner’s socio-educational model of acquiring a secondary language is applicable. Gardner suggested that success in learning secondary languages cannot be attributed solely to aptitude or competency and stressed the importance of the cultural contexts that influence attitude to motivate learning the language. Likewise, I believe that there are social, contextual and pragmatic reasons that “non-literal” interpretations of Creation will continue to grow.
 

Martin Marprelate

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Reformed Baptist (1689er)
Particular Redemption (too many things I disagree with Calvin about to call myself a Calvinist)
Covenant Theology
Creationist
Amillennialist
Byzantine Text preferred (I use the NKJV everywhere but my home church where I use the NIV 1984)
Formal Equivalence Translations
Member of Gideons Int.
Christ-centred hymns of any vintage, but I prefer it if they rhyme and scan
 
Last edited:

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Reformed Baptist (1689er)
Particular Redemption (too many things I disagree with Calvin about to call myself a Calvinist)
Covenant Theology
Creationist
Amillennialist
Byzantine Text preferred (I use the NKJV everywhere but my home church where I use the NIV 1984)
Formal Equivalence Translations
Member of Gideons Int.
Christ-centred hymns of any vintage, but I prefer it if they rhyme and scan
Scan?
 

Deacon

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Wow, not sure I want a permanent history of my beliefs – I’ve developed and changed so much during my personal studies.
I’ve become more tentative in my views and open/accepting of other well-thought-out opinions - and more tolerant of ignorance.

When I teach, I follow our congregational standards and expound in an uncontroversial style, introducing but not teaching opposing views.
So what I teach isn't always fully my own personal understanding of things.

  • Baptist
  • Free Grace Soteriology
  • Evolutionary Creationist
  • Use of the Critical edition text (NA28)/eclectic textual criticism
  • Deliberate translation variation (currently LEB, soon the CSB)
  • Awkward inerrantist/ inspired subjectivity
Rob
 

John of Japan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Baptist--Fundamental
Calvinist--not
dispensational premil
7 literal days of creation
Literary Framework interpretation of Genesis--history
Byzantine Priority

Verbatim method of translaiton (somewhat different from what most call "word for word")
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Reformed Baptist (1689er)
Particular Redemption (too many things I disagree with Calvin about to call myself a Calvinist)
Covenant Theology
Creationist
Amillennialist
Byzantine Text preferred (I use the NKJV everywhere but my home church where I use the NIV 1984)
Formal Equivalence Translations
Member of Gideons Int.
Christ-centred hymns of any vintage, but I prefer it if they rhyme and scan
Interesting that most holding to Calvin views are called reformed, while those of us not holding to them all are actually called the calvinists!
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I had considered several interpretations, but the nature of reconciliation always brought me back to the "literal" view.

That said, I believe “non-literal” interpretations (such as theistic evolution, the gap theory) will become increasingly the dominant view as the “literal” interpretation is often considered archaic or passé to modern reasoning. Christianity always exists within a culture that “speaks another language”. Perhaps R.C .Gardner’s socio-educational model of acquiring a secondary language is applicable. Gardner suggested that success in learning secondary languages cannot be attributed solely to aptitude or competency and stressed the importance of the cultural contexts that influence attitude to motivate learning the language. Likewise, I believe that there are social, contextual and pragmatic reasons that “non-literal” interpretations of Creation will continue to grow.
Think that the 2 biggest reasons for that are the watering down of the authority of scripture, as a more limited inspration view is now being held, and the desire to accommodate as "scientific facts" assured Evolution!
 

Dr. Bob

Administrator
Administrator
Baptist, formerly (20 years ago) Mennonite
Calvinism? When I joined here I was about a 2.5 pointer, I've probably been talked up to a 3 & 2/3 pointer since then.
Premil, undecided on pre- or mid-trib, dispy-lite.
Literal creation and hell.
I favor CT translations (HCSB, LEB) but have no beef with TR or Byz.
I prefer singing from a hymnal, but some of those songs they project on the wall are pretty catchy.
Your theology is slowly evolving, bro, and soon you will be 5.5 . . . :)
 

Dr. Bob

Administrator
Administrator
Historic Fundamental Baptist
Particular Baptist (5 point calvinistic)
Progressive Dispensational (pre-trib, pre-mill . . . I don't even eat Post Toasties)
Young Earth Creationist
Literal Adam and Eve
Nestle/Aland/Aland 28
Formal Equivalency
Temperance over abstinence
Non-liturgical Worship
Non-eccumenical
Psalter and Quality Hymns
Matzoh and wine each week at worship for Lord's Supper

[Aside: I was a Chevy man, but boy I love my Subaru Outback getting around this winter]
 

evangelist6589

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Baptist
Calvinist
Historic premillenial
Theistic Evolutionist (though I consider OEC possible)
Literary Framework interpretation of Genesis (though I consider the standard day-age OEC interpretation possible)
NA27-28 > Byzantine
Word for word > thought for thought
I'm fine with inclusive language

That is me, I think I got most things lol

SBC Baptist
Calvinist
Dispensational pre mill
6 literal creation days
Literal view of Hell but open to the metaphorical view.
Word for word and thought for thought as I prefer ESV/NIV.
Way of the Master evangelist
 

evangelist6589

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Historic Fundamental Baptist
Particular Baptist (5 point calvinistic)
Progressive Dispensational (pre-trib, pre-mill . . . I don't even eat Post Toasties)
Young Earth Creationist
Literal Adam and Eve
Nestle/Aland/Aland 28
Formal Equivalency
Temperance over abstinence
Non-liturgical Worship
Non-eccumenical
Psalter and Quality Hymns
Matzoh and wine each week at worship for Lord's Supper

[Aside: I was a Chevy man, but boy I love my Subaru Outback getting around this winter]

What does temperance over absistence mean regarding drinking?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top