Don't rely on a message board, read the arguments for yourself then see if they are biblical.
http://www.amazon.com/dp/0595143423/?tag=baptis04-20
Grasshopper, have you read Fudge's book?
Westtexas
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Don't rely on a message board, read the arguments for yourself then see if they are biblical.
http://www.amazon.com/dp/0595143423/?tag=baptis04-20
There is no question that those whose name is not written in the Lamb's book of life are thrown into the lake of fire. There is no question that the fire is eternal for Satan and his co-horts suffer forever and ever. There is no question that the lost suffer torment. So what is possible is after a person is punished justly for their misdeeds, they are destroyed, rather than eternal torment. The punishment, confinement, separation from God, will certainly be eternal.
What makes this a possible option is no verse says eternal torment for humans, with the caveat that some posters say the word translated punishment actually means torment. And the verse that says the smoke from their torment will rise forever and ever might be referring to the ongoing generation of smoke from torment. That is why the majority of people accept the speculation.
I agree that this is a very reasonable, and scripturally supported, option.
InTheLight,
re: "Jude 7: In a similar way, Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding towns gave themselves up to sexual immorality and perversion. They serve as an example of those who suffer the punishment of eternal fire."
Is Sodom and Gomorrah still burning today? If you went to Israel today, would smoke still be going up and the flames still burning where Sodom and Gomorrah used to be? Or might their destruction be eternal as an effect of the fire?
I disagree. Had the Greek simply meant penal confinement rather than torment, the pre-KJV versions would not have used 'torment' 'paine' and 'payne' in Matthew 25:46.Should we assume the modern translations got it wrong when they translate Kolasis as punishment, rather than torment or pain? Should we discard modern scholarship in order support doctrine based on assumption? I think not. The root meaning of the word has to do with penal confinement, rather than torment.
There is no question that those whose name is not written in the Lamb's book of life are thrown into the lake of fire. There is no question that the fire is eternal for Satan and his co-horts suffer forever and ever. There is no question that the lost suffer torment. So what is possible is after a person is punished justly for their misdeeds, they are destroyed, rather than eternal torment. The punishment, confinement, separation from God, will certainly be eternal.
What makes this a possible option is no verse says eternal torment for humans, with the caveat that some posters say the word translated punishment actually means torment. And the verse that says the smoke from their torment will rise forever and ever might be referring to the ongoing generation of smoke from torment. That is why the majority of people accept the speculation.
For me the issue is not justifying either eternal torment or destruction after being tormented according to God's justice for misdeeds, the issue is folks spreading disunity who claim either view is doctrine when it is based on assumptions.
Jude 7 shouldn't be too hard to explain when one considers that it cannot be talking about Sodom and Gomorrah the buildings, trees, roads, etc., but rather it is speaking of Sodom and Gomorrah the people.
Buildings do not give themselves up to sexual immorality and perversion, but people do.
And since the Word of God says they suffer eternal fire, they suffer eternal fire even at this very minute.
Of course the physical cities are not still burning... but the people are just as God's Word says they are.
You are welcome.Thank you Steadfast.
As usually ends up being the case we’re just going around in circles now. You’ve stated your positions, and I’ve stated mine. I still don’t understand why you folks want to torture someone for eternity simply because they haven’t meet certain requirements during there few short years of life but I guess it takes all kinds Nor do I understand why some of you want to believe that the supreme being knows before he creates an individual that he will eventually be tossing the person into the lake of fire yet nevertheless goes ahead and creates the person anyway.
Not one of us wants to 'torture' anyone for any length of time.As usually ends up being the case we’re just going around in circles now. You’ve stated your positions, and I’ve stated mine. I still don’t understand why you folks want to torture someone for eternity simply because they haven’t meet certain requirements during there few short years of life but I guess it takes all kinds Nor do I understand why some of you want to believe that the supreme being knows before he creates an individual that he will eventually be tossing the person into the lake of fire yet nevertheless goes ahead and creates the person anyway.
Not one of us wants to 'torture' anyone for any length of time.
The Word of God teaches the eternal torments of the unrighteous. He will do that which He has said He will do, whether man likes it or not.
All things were created for God's pleasure. Yet not all things please God. For instance, He is not pleased with the death of the wicked. God did not create man to be wicked, man chooses to be wicked.
Scripture reveals that the wages (payment) for sin is death, (separation from God) but the gift of God is eternal life (turn ye and live "Ezekiel 18:32) through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Man has a choice, turn from sin and live, or continue in sin and be separated from God for all eternity. Separation is not the only penalty man incurs from God's wrath. Eternal torment (Matthew 25:46; Mark 9:43-48) is also part of the sentence passed upon man for his wickedness.
Like it or not, that is what God determined to happen to those who die without Christ.
Reader's Digest Condensed Version?Very well stated!! You put together in a few words, that I clouldn't have written in a 1,000 page novel!! Bravo!! Encore!! Encore!! Encore!!
(((((AMEN)))))!!!!!
When Solomon spoke of the dead knowing not, he was not saying the dead are not conscious of anything at all. They are conscious of their surroundings, Jesus makes this clear when He tells the story of the rich man and Lazarus. What they are not aware of is things that are going on on the earth above them.Steadfast Fred,
re: "Not one of us wants to 'torture' anyone for any length of time."
So I don’t understand why you try to interpret scripture to the contrary. Why not concentrate on all of the scriptures that say one way or another that the consequence on sin is death - and take death to mean the cessation and absence of life? Eccl. 9:5 - "...but the dead know not anything...".
Matthew 25:46 And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.re: "The Word of God teaches the eternal torments of the unrighteous."
There is not a single scripture that absolutely has to be interpreted no other way than to mean that the fate of the unsaved is to spend eternity in conscious torment. With the possible exception of the devil’s fate in Revelation 20:10 in the KJV, "torment" and "eternal" are never found in conjunction with each other.
re: "All things were created for God's pleasure. Yet not all things please God."
So knowing before He creates a person that He will eventually be tossing the person into the lake of fire, why do you think that He goes ahead and creates the person anyway? What pleasure can He get from that?
re: "Scripture reveals that the wages (payment) for sin is death, (separation from God)..."
It is also separation from everything else.