Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Gina how old are you again? are you that lame, that you cannot see what i knew it was about? DuhhhhFrenchy: LINK
This definition of troll is why I consider you to be one, in case you were wondering.
Yes, but right now I'd rather hear from her re my 2 questions, one of which I've asked 3 times.Originally posted by Marcia:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Frenchy:
doesn't anyone else want to know what Gina's definition of FORNICATION and ADULTRY is?
don't you think that would help all of us understand where she is comming from?
Yes, but right now I'd rather hear from her re my 2 questions, one of which I've asked 3 times.Originally posted by Gina L:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Marcia:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Frenchy:
doesn't anyone else want to know what Gina's definition of FORNICATION and ADULTRY is?
don't you think that would help all of us understand where she is comming from?
Yes there is. As a preacher, when I perform a wedding, I am required by law to file the proper forms. If I fail to that, I am in violation of the law. It's not an unjust law, so I have no right to ignore it and break it.As far as disobedience to the law, there is no disobedience to the law by not having your marriage recognized by the courts.
Well said. Right! </font>[/QUOTE]Thank you. Same to ya on your post on page three.Originally posted by paidagogos:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Aaron:
A marriage is the union of a man and a woman in a covenant relationship ratified by an oath or vow. ...
I believe that God did establish civil government. See Romans. God, in my opinion, did not oppose government. He set up a theocracy in Israel with Himself as King. When the people asked for a king, God said that they were rejecting Him as King. He did give them what they wanted. But it does not show that He is in opposition to government.Originally posted by Gina L:
........Gina: I don't know that I agree with the idea that God established civil government. Did he not oppose the very idea of government, and only put a leader in to satisfy a human sin nature, and we've paid the price ever since? Was it not to enforce biblical laws, not to make extraneous laws?
..........
No one would interpret the "laws of the land" this way. The law of the land was Roman law. We were discussing civil laws. I was not being rough on Gina. This is what she said:Originally posted by bapmom:
As to the "laws of the land" being broken.....the Romans allowed the Jewish people a certain amount of self-rule. Thus, the Pharisaical laws WERE the laws of the land for Jesus and His disciples. Jesus healed on the Sabbath which, according to the Pharisees was a violation of their law. Please remember, when Gina first cited this instance she specifically said that Jesus did things that could have been SEEN AS breaking those laws. Some of you are getting a little too rough here with her, imo.
I don't think Gina meant the Pharisees' rules or she would have been able to answer me right away, when I asked her what laws Jesus broke.Did Christ "appear" to be a sinner by actually breaking laws? Real laws, not ones that didn't exist, like imaginary laws that say one must get married.
Yep. He broke them. Christ broke the laws of the land.