• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

What do you normally do when a Jehovah Witness knocks on your door?

Status
Not open for further replies.

gb93433

Active Member
Site Supporter
DHK said:
You are adding to the Word here. (meaning church of course). It does not mean church. The word church is not used. You are inserting something that is not there. It is entirely your opinion and nothing else. You have no support for that in this letter. It simply says:
Do not receive them into your house.
Don't try and redefine what the Bible says.
There is no door of ministry inviting false teachers into your house. It goes contrary to the Word (2John 1:10). It is a simple matter of obedience. We have a ministry in obedience.


Here is a good suggestion. Go back and study the small book of Philemon. There is Scripture there that indicates that there was a church that met at his house.
May I suggest that you study Philemon and apply the passage in 2 Jn to Philemon.

You mentioned in Post #138, “People of other faiths, even teachers, are encouraged to sit under the preaching of the Word of God. No one but our teachers and preachers can bring forth the Word of God. But all are welcome to attend. Remember, John was speaking about a home.”

So you are saying that it is okay for false teachers to come and attend the church at your home but not be in your home? I find that rather puzzling. The last place I want them is infiltrating the church. I want them to be known as false teachers among the believers. Apparently you have not seen the troubles false teachers can cause in a church. It is horrible. I watched a church die because of that. The pastor allowed a false teacher to come to the church. That person got to know many people and eventually the people fled in masse once they found out and almost over night the church died. The pastor is gone and the church no longer exists.

You are not even consistent in your approach to scripture. In one sentence you talk about Philemon as having a house church and drawing a distinction between that and the house in 2 Jn. How is Philemon’s house different when the people assembled for worship and when they did not? A few hours in the day? There is a family that lived there at Philemon’s house. So according to your practice and how you interpret 2 John, Philemon could have invited a false teacher in his house for worship but not at any other time? I find that very disturbing.

A close friend of mine who was a missionary in Ethiopia for many years during communism told me many times of how the communists would try to infiltrate their group. I cannot imagine anyone in their group inviting a communist to their meetings knowingly. The communists had one purpose in mind for the group. Those folks met in different places each time they met. I am surprised you would so eagerly allow false teachers in the midst of believers, some of who may be very young and weak. That is much like inviting a wolf in sheep’s clothing to sleep with young lambs in a barn. There is nothing good that comes from that sort of thing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

gb93433

Active Member
Site Supporter
standingfirminChrist said:
The thing is, the JW's do not come seeking the truth. They come for one reason and one reason only... to spread damnable heresies.

Sometimes knowingly and at other times out of ignorance and brainwashing. I have found both and expose them. It is great to see what happens when one begins to see the light of the truth. I cannot imagine that happening to someone who knocks on my door and does not hear the truth.

When one invites them into their house, they are disobeying not just the clear command found in 2 John 1:10, but also the clear command found in Ephesians 4:27. They are allowing the devil a foothold.

Again and again I have asked you for some documentation. Yet you have provided zero. Your ability to do research and convince anyone seems to be seriously lacking. When Paul stood before the emperor he contended for the faith in ways that the emperor understood. We understand well that you are a broken record that makes no sense and has a wrong interpretation and application of scripture. Your Darbyism exceeds my ability to comprehend such interpretation.

I wonder what you would think if a student invited some Mormons over to their dorm room in the presence of other Christans to expose them for who they really are?
 
gb,

Over and over both DHK and myself have showed you that the ekklesia (the church) is not mentioned in the second epistle of John.

oikia is translated as a residence, a household, a home.

The Bible is all the documentation needed. Yet you refuse to believe and heed to it.
 
2 John 1:10 If <ei tis> there come <erchomai> any <ei tis> <tis> unto <pros> you <humas>, and <kai> bring <phero> not <ou> this <taute> doctrine <didache>, receive <lambano> him <autos> not <me> into <eis> your house <oikia>, neither <kai> <me> bid <lego> him <autos> God speed <chairo>:

Strong's Greek Dictionary
3614. oikia
Search for G3614 in KJVSL
oikia oikia oy-kee'-ah
from 3624; properly, residence (abstractly), but usually (concretely) an abode (literally or figuratively); by implication, a family (especially domestics):--home, house(-hold).

See Greek 3624

It is a home John was speaking about. One which a family resides in. Not a Church.
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
gb93433 said:
May I suggest that you study Philemon and apply the passage in 2 Jn to Philemon.

You mentioned in Post #138, “People of other faiths, even teachers, are encouraged to sit under the preaching of the Word of God. No one but our teachers and preachers can bring forth the Word of God. But all are welcome to attend. Remember, John was speaking about a home.”
I said that about our church. Look at what century we live in, and then look at which nation I live in and then consider. Our city (and nation) is multi-cultural. We live in a time where the minorities are projected to be the majorities in just a few years. Our church in particular has an outreach to some of these particular people--Muslims and others. Thus it is not unusual to see the occasional person of another faith in our church. What I said is that "all are welcome to attend." We don't shut the door on anyone. We encourage all to come and sit under the preaching of the Word.
So you are saying that it is okay for false teachers to come and attend the church at your home but not be in your home?
I didn't say that. Our church meets in a church building which is rather large, and our congregation is fairly large right now also. That also makes a difference. We are not in a house.
I find that rather puzzling. The last place I want them is infiltrating the church. I want them to be known as false teachers among the believers.
Who is speaking of any great infiltration. I said all are welcome. We had a Sikh leader attend our church. But he did not bring the entire congregation of Gudvara with him. Let's use common sense here! Usually such a person visits by himself and only once or twice. Usually it is out of curiosity. Any person who regularly attends and tries to sow seeds of discord among the brethren will be disciplined out of the church--and that has happened in the history of our church as well.
Apparently you have not seen the troubles false teachers can cause in a church. It is horrible. I watched a church die because of that. The pastor allowed a false teacher to come to the church. That person got to know many people and eventually the people fled in masse once they found out and almost over night the church died. The pastor is gone and the church no longer exists.
No offence but I have probably seen it happen more than you have, unfortunately. Yes, I have seen one church die, but many others split because of it, and some Biblically disciplined.
You are not even consistent in your approach to scripture. In one sentence you talk about Philemon as having a house church and drawing a distinction between that and the house in 2 Jn. How is Philemon’s house different when the people assembled for worship and when they did not? A few hours in the day? There is a family that lived there at Philemon’s house. So according to your practice and how you interpret 2 John, Philemon could have invited a false teacher in his house for worship but not at any other time? I find that very disturbing.
Could have, would have, suppose, if, etc.
I don't read into the Scriptures. There is no indication in 2John that there was a church, none whatsoever. The letter was written to a lady and her children. You can't get any further away from a church setting than that. He was writing to her to beware of false teachers coming to her house--not to invite them in. Why do people take such a simple teaching and try to complicate it? They do the same thing with the simple message of salvation--complicate it with works. Simple things do not need to be complicated.
A close friend of mine who was a missionary in Ethiopia for many years during communism told me many times of how the communists would try to infiltrate their group. I cannot imagine anyone in their group inviting a communist to their meetings knowingly. The communists had one purpose in mind for the group.
But that was not the situation was it.
The elect lady was specifically told not to receive false teachers, such as J.W.'s into her house. They were identifiable.
Those folks met in different places each time they met. I am surprised you would so eagerly allow false teachers in the midst of believers, some of who may be very young and weak. That is much like inviting a wolf in sheep’s clothing to sleep with young calves in a barn.
You are misquoting me. I said I would never allow a false teacher in my house, never!
But I would allow anyone to come and hear the preaching of the Word in the "church building." We have safety in numbers. And the entire church will treat any guest with hospitality and all will try to show Christian grace to such a won, that he may be won to Christ. The home is not the place for such activity. At the church building we have a plurality of pastors, many experienced Godly men, and others who know the Word well. We keep an eye on our visitors, and on our children!
There is nothing good that comes from that sort of thing. Take a look at how Jesus dealt with Nicodemus. It was in private not in an assembly. Nicodemus came to Jesus.
Nicodemus was a sincere Rabbi, seeking for the Messiah. He was saved after his meeting with Christ, hardly then a false teacher. He was seeking for Christ. Your comparison is apples and oranges. Nicodemus sought out the Saviour. That argument flies in the face of Calvinism doesn't it?
 
The fact that Paul told Timothy that the Bishop is to be the husband of one wife should cause one to see that John could not have been writing to a Church. Women were not to lead Churches. Had it been to a Church, John would have sent it to a man.

The fact that it was to a woman indicated it was her home he was speaking of.
 

gb93433

Active Member
Site Supporter
standingfirminChrist said:
gb,

Over and over both DHK and myself have showed you that the ekklesia (the church) is not mentioned in the second epistle of John.

oikia is translated as a residence, a household, a home.

Your own theology is inconsistent. So your point is worthless.
 

gb93433

Active Member
Site Supporter
DHK said:
Our church meets in a church building which is rather large, and our congregation is fairly large right now also. That also makes a difference. We are not in a house.

I apologize. I went back and looked over the posts and noticed where the church was started in a home. I had thought that it was in your home.
You did not adress the first part of what I wrote. I wrote, " May I suggest that you study Philemon and apply the passage in 2 Jn to Philemon.'

Now apply your theology of 2 Jn to Philemon and the church which met in his house.

The home that Philemon's church met in was Philemon's home.
You did mention that anyone is welcome in your church but not in your home. Philemon's home and church was the same place.
 

gb93433

Active Member
Site Supporter
standingfirminChrist said:
as I said previously, gb. Go ahead and disobey the command in God's Word. I am not the one you have to answer to for it.
So why do you act like a broken record and supply nothing more than the same words? That kind of faith reminds me much of the snake charmers. They just go on believeing the same nonsense (ignorance). It is a fact that some have died because of snake bites too. Yet they continue to believe.

I have noticed that you pick and choose what you want to answer. Your faith is rather slippery. Often you have no reason for what you wrote other than to avoid the questions. It is very hard to catch a greased pig.

Again you conveniently refused to answer my question about asking you if Mark 16:17, 18 is a promise.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

gb93433

Active Member
Site Supporter
DHK said:
That argument flies in the face of Calvinism doesn't it?

You are right. To even give honor to Calvin's theology is idolatry. What I find interesting is that he knew the weaknesses of his own theology if carried too far.
 
gb,

Why do you sound like a broken record in denying the fact that the epistle was not written to a Church, nor about a Church?

To compare Philemon and John's second epistle and say John's epistle is speaking of a Church because Philemon had a Church in his home is ludicrous.

Scripture clearly states Philemon had a Church in his home.

Scripture clearly states the second epistle written by John was to the elect lady in her residence.

The Church is not mentioned at all in that epistle. You are adding to Scripture saying it is.

As to Mark 8, that is another topic entirely. Open another thread if you want to discuss it.
 

D28guy

New Member
DHK,

"Why do you take Scripture out of context and ignore the plain teaching of the Scripture right before your eyes.
Here is the Scriptue:

2 John 1:10 If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed:
--Deal with it. Obey it."

I have. And I do.

OK. Here is a scripture for you...

"15 And He said to them, "Go into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature. 16 He who believes and is baptized will be saved; but he who does not believe will be condemned. 17 And these signs will follow those who believe: In My name they will cast out demons; they will speak with new tongues; 18 they[[/FONT]a] will take up serpents; and if they drink anything deadly, it will by no means hurt them; they will lay hands on the sick, and they will recover."


Unless I have misunderstood, I believe I have heard you say many times on these boards that the true gift of speaking in tongues is not for today. Well, God here says different.

Do you speak in tongues? If not, why? You need to deal with that commandment from the Lord. Obey it.

Do you lay hands on the sick, and they miraculously rise healed as Christ did? He said that those who believe will do it. You need to deal with that commandment from the Lord. Obey His clear directive to you.

Do you take up serpents? The scripture says His believers will do that. Why do you disobey Gods clear command to you to take up serpents? You need to deal with it! Obey it!

You will probably say something like.... "Well, we dont interpret the scriptures in *isolation*. We take into consideration the WHOLE scriptural revelation. We compare scripture with scripture, and come to the reasonable interpretation based on the whole of Gods written revelation.

And you would be correct in saying that. But you seem to have a selective memory regarding that pricliple. You take this scripture...

If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed:"

...and just rip it from the rest of scripture and interpret it in isolation....IN SPITE OF the fact that your view of it causes it to COMPLETLY and VIOLENTLY fly in the face of reams and reams and reams of scriptures that speak of contending earnestly for the truth with those you are in error, and preaching the true gospel to every person, and blessing those who persecute you, rather than curse them, and being able to use the scriptures for "reproof", "correction" and "instruction in rightiousness" regarding those who are in opposition.

When those in opposition came to Christ...He interacted with them. When they came to Paul, he interacted with them. Even the idolaters in Athens. And EVEN when they came to him when he was in his own rented home dwelling place. He recieved ALL who came to him.

You are saying that we are to go into all the world, and minister to the lost to the furthest parts of the earth, EVERYWHERE the lost can be found!!!...EXCEPT if they come to your front door, where you show them christion *indifferance* and apathy by...turning them away.

C'mon, DHK.

The were primarily meeting in HOUSE churches for worship and teaching after they left Jerusalem. And if false teachers came visiting and tried to dupe the chirstians into letting them TEACH and PROPAGATE the false teaching in that "house", the admonition you are referring to makes absolute sense.

That is the ONLY application that makes any sense.

And by the way, regarding another comment of yours, I believe anyones kids would be greatly benefited and blessed by seeing their Dad caring about lost people enought to take an hour or so out of his free time to try and help some people who very much need to come to understand the truth regarding the true gospel.

Grace and peace,

Mike
 
D28,

Are you somehow forgetting that one can witness to the JW's without going against God's Word by inviting them into one's home?

One can witness to them in the street, outside, in a park, a restaraunt, practically anywhere;except one place... in one's own home. Scripture says don't do it.

And like I told gb, Mark 8 has nothing to do with this thread. Take it to a new thread.
 

Matt Black

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Yeah, whatever...when you and DHK sincerely engage with the question which Mike and GB have put to you, I might take a bit of notice...

So, what about Mark 16? What about hating your own family? What about stoning children to death? I hope you do all of these things, otherwise you're in direct disobedience to "the clear word of God".
 
Matt, apparently you have a problem... and it isn't me or DHK.

When Jesus said

Luke 14:26 If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.

He was not advocating the hate that is the same as murder. Hatred there is translated as 'to love less.' God does not expect us to have an animosity toward anyone...contrary to what I see coming from many on this thread.

I can attest to the fact that I do put Jesus above all others... family or not.

Stone our children? Funny, I think Jesus addressed that too...

John 8:7 So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
 

gb93433

Active Member
Site Supporter
standingfirminChrist said:
gb,

Why do you sound like a broken record in denying the fact that the epistle was not written to a Church, nor about a Church?

To compare Philemon and John's second epistle and say John's epistle is speaking of a Church because Philemon had a Church in his home is ludicrous.

Scripture clearly states Philemon had a Church in his home.

Scripture clearly states the second epistle written by John was to the elect lady in her residence.

The Church is not mentioned at all in that epistle. You are adding to Scripture saying it is.

Remember there are many things which are not said. If I read a letter you wrote to your wife I am sure there would be many things which would not written and understood by her but not me. To assume that because something is not written and therefore it does not exist because is simply wrong. Nobody will know the entire issue nor interpret correctly until they study the things that surround the writing during that time period and in that culture. There are many things which existed that scripture does not even mention.

The house church in Philemon met at Philemon's place. It is a residence that Philemon lived at. Now apply 2 John 10 to that situation.

Does it really matter is the house in 2 Jn is house church or a house? No, because we know that churches met in personal residences anyway.

I believe that 2 Jn is written to a church that meets in a house partly because the letter is written to the elect lady and her children. Children in John’s writings are those who are members of a church. The same author uses the word children in 3 Jn 4 as not his family but those who follow the truth. John uses a lot of metaphorical language in his writings.

The Bible says to not receive them and give them a greeting. Those sorts of things are what brothers and sisters in Christ would have done and do today. That is where I stand on that verse and the whole issue.

It is the same thing when a relative of mine comes who is in a cult. They know they are welcome but I do not receive them or greet them as a brother or sister in Christ.

The word used for the command “receive” is a second person plural. Who is the plural translated as “you”?
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
gb93433 said:
I apologize. I went back and looked over the posts and noticed where the church was started in a home. I had thought that it was in your home.
You did not adress the first part of what I wrote. I wrote, " May I suggest that you study Philemon and apply the passage in 2 Jn to Philemon.'
I have. They are two different epistles with two different purposes, written to two different people. There is little in common, except that they both have one chapter.
Now apply your theology of 2 Jn to Philemon and the church which met in his house.
The home that Philemon's church met in was Philemon's home.
You did mention that anyone is welcome in your church but not in your home. Philemon's home and church was the same place.
I also showed you (and for good reason) how houses in our culture varied greatly from houses in the east. Also look in Phil.1:2 and compare it with Col.4:17. Archippus was a minister of the gospel. There is a good chance that he was the pastor or at least the acting pastor of the church that met at Philemon's house.

Philemon 1:2 And to our beloved Apphia, and Archippus our fellowsoldier, and to the church in thy house:
--a church is mentioned in Philemon; but no church is mentioned in 2John. There is a reason for that. There was none.

You argue just like the RCC. It goes like this--Infant baptism is demonstrated by the jailor's household in Acts 16:31. Because there was a household, there must have been infants.
Your argument is the same: Because there was a house, there must have been a church. You are reading into the Scripture something that is not there, just as the RCC does. There is no Scriptural basis for it.
Do you believe in purgatory also?
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
D28guy said:
DHK,
I have. And I do.
By your own testimony you don't; you don't obey a simple command given in a small book of the NT:

2 John 1:10 If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed:
--So simple; and yet so difficult for you to receive.
OK. Here is a scripture for you...Mark 16:15-18
Unless I have misunderstood, I believe I have heard you say many times on these boards that the true gift of speaking in tongues is not for today. Well, God here says different.[/quote]
No God doesn't say anything different. He was speaking to His disciples. They were for the first century. I challenge you to pick up a jar of HCL and drink it. After all it does say "any deadly thing" you can drink, right? So why not take ALL of it literally?
Do you speak in tongues? If not, why? You need to deal with that commandment from the Lord. Obey it.

Do you lay hands on the sick, and they miraculously rise healed as Christ did? He said that those who believe will do it. You need to deal with that commandment from the Lord. Obey His clear directive to you.

Do you take up serpents? The scripture says His believers will do that. Why do you disobey Gods clear command to you to take up serpents? You need to deal with it! Obey it!
Again, you are a hypocrite. You don't do all that is written in that passage yourself. In fact you don't even speak in "Biblical tongues," or have the gift of "Biblical healing" as demonstrated in Acts 5:16. That in itself proves that todays "gifts," are a sham and fake.
You will probably say something like.... "Well, we dont interpret the scriptures in *isolation*. We take into consideration the WHOLE scriptural revelation. We compare scripture with scripture, and come to the reasonable interpretation based on the whole of Gods written revelation.
No, it proves what goes on today in the name of Christianity is an insult to God and Christ. It is blasphemy, (the definition of which is "insulting God.").

However when we do compare Scripture with Scripture it is very evident that the spiritual gifts have ceased, and yes we don't take Scripture in isolation, but we do take them in the context in which they are given. If the context is ignored, we will never come to the proper meaning of the passage in question.
And you would be correct in saying that. But you seem to have a selective memory regarding that pricliple. You take this scripture...

"If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed:"
...and just rip it from the rest of scripture and interpret it in isolation....IN SPITE OF the fact that your view of it causes it to COMPLETLY and VIOLENTLY fly in the face of reams and reams and reams of scriptures that speak of contending earnestly for the truth with those you are in error, and preaching the true gospel to every person, and blessing those who persecute you, rather than curse them, and being able to use the scriptures for "reproof", "correction" and "instruction in rightiousness" regarding those who are in opposition.
How foolish. Scripture must be interpreted in the light of the context in which it is written. If you ignore the context in which it is written you have no meaning at all. If you ignore the context of the Israelites walking around the walls of Jericho, and the walls falling down, then, according to your method of interpretation--ignoring reams and reams of Scripture, one must conclude that any believer can walk around any "house or building" and have faith that the walls will come falling down. That is your application, because you ignore the immediate context and only take "the reams and reams of remote Scripture and apply them--ignoring immediate context.
When those in opposition came to Christ...He interacted with them. When they came to Paul, he interacted with them. Even the idolaters in Athens. And EVEN when they came to him when he was in his own rented home dwelling place. He recieved ALL who came to him.
This has nothing to do with the immediate context of the entire book of 2 John. It is non sequitor.
You are saying that we are to go into all the world, and minister to the lost to the furthest parts of the earth, EVERYWHERE the lost can be found!!!...EXCEPT if they come to your front door, where you show them christion *indifferance* and apathy by...turning them away.
Again, non sequitor. You ignore the context of the entire book. You also ignore the purpose and intent of the Great Commission and have it backwards. It says GO, not false teachers come. What a terrible interpretation.
The were primarily meeting in HOUSE churches for worship and teaching after they left Jerusalem.
Evidence please! There is nothing in the entire book to suggest a church; Nothing!
And if false teachers came visiting and tried to dupe the chirstians into letting them TEACH and PROPAGATE the false teaching in that "house", the admonition you are referring to makes absolute sense.
That is why it is there. And that is what people like the J.W.'s do.
That is the ONLY application that makes any sense.

And by the way, regarding another comment of yours, I believe anyones kids would be greatly benefited and blessed by seeing their Dad caring about lost people enought to take an hour or so out of his free time to try and help some people who very much need to come to understand the truth regarding the true gospel.
They do see that; but never in the sanctity of my own home. It is outside; never inside. This house was dedicated to the Lord. We invite believers into our house for fellowship, Bible studies, etc. We don't invite false teacher's to spread heretical doctrines, messengers of Satan to spread Satan's message.
 

gb93433

Active Member
Site Supporter
DHK said:
I have. They are two different epistles with two different purposes, written to two different people. There is little in common, except that they both have one chapter.

I also showed you (and for good reason) how houses in our culture varied greatly from houses in the east.
DHK said:

Also look in Phil.1:2 and compare it with Col.4:17. Archippus was a minister of the gospel. There is a good chance that he was the pastor or at least the acting pastor of the church that met at Philemon's house.


Are you a dispensationalist?


Why would anyone care about the size of a home in our culture today? The size of a home in the U.S. is irrelevant to the size of a home in the east. Homes in the U.S. vary from about 600 square feet to over 30,000 square feet. So how does that help one to interpret 2 Jn 10. Why would you dismiss the correct interpretation on the basis on the size of a home?

To try and establish a theology on the basis of the size of a home is junk theology at its best. That is like establishing the size of a home at this time last century on the basis of the homes of today. If your estimates were right there would be no need for a tentmaker.
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Did you not read what I wrote in post #197, “I believe that 2 Jn is written to a church that meets in a house partly because the letter is written to the elect lady and her children. Children in John’s writings are those who are members of a church. The same author uses the word children in 3 Jn 4 as not his family but those who follow the truth. John uses a lot of metaphorical language in his writings.”[/FONT]


[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot][/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top