'Zackly.:thumbs:
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Why not?gb93433 said:If you believe that then can you explain 1 Cor 15:29 using scripture alone?
1 Cor 15:29, "Otherwise, what will those do who are baptized for the dead? If the dead are not raised at all, why then are they baptized for them?"
DHK said:Why not?First I will show that this is an unsciptural practice for baptism is for the living.
Second I will show the purpose of baptism by using Romans 6:3,4--baptism signifying the death of our life of sin, and resurrection of our new life in Christ; obviously not for the dead.
Thirdly, it is a command of Christ (Mat.28:19,20.)
The command comes after salvation (as is the pattern of NT churches) Acts 2:41.
There is no example anywhere in the Nt of anyone ever being baptized for the dead.
It doesn't matter. We don't have to know. All we have to know is that it wasn't an acceptable practice in the eyes of Paul. It was a pagan practice that was not Biblical. To find out the exact answer you would have to go to extra-Biblical sources, just as you would have to do to find out the names of the various leaders of the nations or empires at that time.gb93433 said:I think you did a good job but Iam unable to see who practiced it unless I consult outside sources.
It is obvious that someone was practicing it but who? Who believed in its practice and what did they actually believe?
standingfirminChrist said:2 John 1:10-11 If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed: For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.
gb93433 said:The words used in those verses are exactly the same word used in
James 1:1. "James, a bond-servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes who are dispersed abroad: Greetings.
It is a Greek greeting.
You mentioned earlier that you talk to them outside your door. Apparently you talk to them beyond a greeting. Why?
Then later I asked "So are you saying that to not give them a greeting is to not let them have the upper hand?"
I cannot believe how many questions I have had to ask to get an answer to one question which oyu have still not answered.
God's word is clear when you avoid the "What does it mean to me" method by studying to show yourself approved to God and correctly interpreting scripture in light of its historical context. Once you obtain the historical background and have obtained the correct interpretation then oyu can think of ways to correctly apply it in modern day America.
standingfirminChrist said:God's Word does not change. If He said don't invite them into your house then, He meant it. And He still means it today.
Not exactly. It is a greeting as well as a "farewell."gb93433 said:The words used in those verses are exactly the same word used in
James 1:1. "James, a bond-servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes who are dispersed abroad: Greetings.
It is a Greek greeting.
The word must be taken in its context. You simply showed how to take the word out of its context. There are many languages that use the same word for both Hi and Good-bye. "Chairo" is one such word. In 2John 1:10, the word is used as a farewell, and in James 1:1 the same word is used as a greeting--two separate contexts, but the same word. Thus the same word has an obvious two different meanings.chairo
a primary verb; to be "cheer"ful, i.e. calmly happy or well-off; impersonally, especially as salutation (on meeting or parting), be well:--farewell, be glad, God speed, greeting, hall, joy(- fully), rejoice.
The requirements of bishops and deacons (servants) are that they be given to hospitality. It is the right thing to do no matter who you are. But 2John 1:10 is not speaking of a greeting; it is speaking of a farewell.You mentioned earlier that you talk to them outside your door. Apparently you talk to them beyond a greeting. Why?
No, I am not defending another poster's answers. But the passage clearly states not to give them a farewell. It is not speaking of a greeting. And it says nothing about an upperhand. They are false teachers. Don't let them into your house. The teaching is plain.Then later I asked "So are you saying that to not give them a greeting is to not let them have the upper hand?"
I cannot believe how many questions I have had to ask to get an answer to one question which oyu have still not answered.
That would be good for you to do.God's word is clear when you avoid the "What does it mean to me" method by studying to show yourself approved to God and correctly interpreting scripture in light of its historical context. Once you obtain the historical background and have obtained the correct interpretation then oyu can think of ways to correctly apply it in modern day America.
They are false teachers. That is a given. If they come for the sole purpose of teaching I do ask them to leave. If they are willling to listen and dialog then we will have discussion. Some choose to leave when they do not like the truth. Their partner sees that soon. I have seen a few shake and some get mad while I have seen others start to question their own teaching right in front of me.DHK said:Not exactly. It is a greeting as well as a "farewell."
Thus you are not rightly dividing the word of truth here. The KJV has accurately translated "chairo" as God-speed" or in our present day language "good-bye" meaning "God be with you." That we are forbidden to do.
The requirements of bishops and deacons (servants) are that they be given to hospitality. It is the right thing to do no matter who you are. But 2John 1:10 is not speaking of a greeting; it is speaking of a farewell.
But the passage clearly states not to give them a farewell. It is not speaking of a greeting.
standingfirminChrist said:2 John 1:10-11 If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed: For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.
The greeting John warns against is not a casual greeting such as "Hi," or "How are you?" The greeting we are not to convey to those who teach false doctrine is "God be with you," "God's go with you," or such like.
I have witnessed to JW's in freezing weather when ice was on tree branches causing them to sag greatly, when telephone lines were on the verge of breaking because of the heaviness of ice... outside.
God did not put a stipulation "unless it is too hot," or "unless it is too cold" into that passage.
No, He said we are not to invite them in, nor are we to give them such a greeting as "God be with you."
I have no argument with that. I have seen the same.gb93433 said:They are false teachers. That is a given. If they come for the sole purpose of teaching I do ask them to leave. If they are willling to listen and dialog then we will have discussion. Some choose to leave when they do not like the truth. Their partner sees that soon. I have seen a few shake and some get mad while I have seen others start to question their own teaching right in front of me.
When I quote you the definition of the word from Strong's, which shows half a dozen different meanings why do you disbelieve me? When I explain that it is a word used like a word in a couple of other languages why do you disbelieve me? Here are the facts:I am aware of other languages. We are not talking about other languages we are talking about the NT usage of the word in the Greek text.
The word for greeting is one word. It is the infinitive form. It is translated by one word "greetings".
Apparently you didn't look too well, did you. The main definition of the word is rejoice, and it is used as farewell, not only in 2John, but also in 2Cor.13:11. Your argument holds no water.Can you show me in scripture where it was ever used as a farewell? In every case I was able to find in scripture it is never used as a farewell but as a greeting.
Who is "them?" That is very important to define.I allow them in my house.
Most of my family belong to a false religion, but I would never deny them entrance into my house. That is not what the passage is speaking about, and I think you know that.Some of them are family members who belong to a cult.
As they should.Over the years most of my family have dynamic Christians. They are not just pew sitters on Sunday. They are busy leading people to Christ and making disciples.
What does this story, a red herring, have to do with the passage at hand? Nothing! Absolutely nothing! It is not talking about family members. It is speaking of false teachers (not family members) coming to one's house to deliberately teach about their false doctrine (such as J.W.'s coming and knocking at your door.) The Bible says not to let them into your house nor to say good-bye to them.Those who have chosent to remain in the cult are getting more and more outnumbered. There was a time when I was the only one whop gave a voice for Christianity in my family. I did not win them by not letting them in my home. Can you explain how I should have applied that verse differently as you suggest and have won them to Christ? I have had many many hours late into the night at times into the morning with a number of them. I can just imagine the picture of us standing outside with them in front of my door while the mosquitos would have had a good meal and then telling them they are not welcome. Just imagine Jesus doing that!!!
Yes, just like the J.W.'s and the Mormons do today.The sad thing is that your Christianity conveniently works, but not every time. What you need to keep in mind is that the false teachers then were not people who would sit in a home and dialog but rather like salesmen peddling their false teaching leading people astray.
Not everyone may have the skills that you have in dealing with the cults. Perhaps few do. Afterall, John was writing to a lady and her children when the Holy Spirit had these words penned. But they are still as relevant to us today as they were then.When people come ot my door I do not give them the liberty to lead a cult study. They get to take a lok at the Bible and I make them declare their error openly. I oin them down on their interpretation. I have had them tell me I am right in front of the other person they are with. I have them tel me if I am right or wrong. Over and over they admit they are wrong and I am right. They do not get another word in until they admit they are wrong once we lok at a passage they have talked about. everythimne if they bring up a verse Weiopen our Biblke and I we take a lok at what it says. They have no free reign to just go off on their tangent. They get confronetd on everything they say.
People of other faiths, even teachers, are encouraged to sit under the preaching of the Word of God. No one but our teachers and preachers can bring forth the Word of God. But all are welcome to attend. Remember, John was speaking about a home.If one came to a church where I was pastoring I would quickly ask them to leave if they were there to teach people. It has happened and I have asked them to leave.
1. John is speaking about a home. And I do make sure that I know exactly who is entering my home. I would hope you would do the same thing, especially if you have young children.If your theology always works then you would know exactly every false teacher who comes into your church without asking or listening to them.
You would lose. Firstly, our church is small and we know each other fairly well. Secondly, it is irrelevant, since John is addressing a lady in her house, and not a church.I would be willing to wager a bet if I could, that you have false teachers in your church and do not know it.
You don't get it do you. I do not invite false teachers into my house. That is what the teaching is. You sure know how to pull a topic off the rails.I would be willing to say that you have even opened the door for them and eaten in their home too. No doubt you have prayed with them too. The problem is that you just do not know it yet.
So that is what Robertson writes. He didn't give you all the pertinent information that you needed to know did he? He has also known to be wrong before. BTW, if you really demand the references for those 74 times the word chairo is used, I can provide them for you. I just didn't feel like typing them all out.Robertson writes,
Greeting (chairein). Absolute infinitive (present active of chairô) as in Ac 15:23 (the Epistle to Antioch and the churches of Syria and Galatia). It is the usual idiom in the thousands of papyri letters known to us, but in no other
New Testament letter. But note chairein legete in 2Jo 1:10,11