Tom Butler
New Member
gb93433 said:Some plagiarize sermons and preach them.
Some actually buy the sermons they plagiarize.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
gb93433 said:Some plagiarize sermons and preach them.
I must have missed this one. (Poor translation in the Bible I use, maybe?) Where is this found? I saw nothing about churches, or "leaders of the churches" in anything Paul said, at Miletus.gb93433 said:When Paul addressed the leaders of the churches in Acts 20 in Miletus, weren't they from house churches?
EdSutton said:Nice job, and nice pulpit to fill, if you can even remotely come close to begin to "fill his shoes." :thumbs:
[Incidentally, this was, I believe, the first and only Pastorate Dr. Ironside ever served in -
EdSutton said:(Not too shabby a joint, for someone with an 8th grade education! :thumbsup,
EdSutton said:and I also believe he literally "died with his boots on" and went home to be with the Lord, while on a preaching tour in New Zealand. I have heard, but cannot confirm, that he was actually preaching a message in NZ, when he was stricken.)]
Those definitely are really BIG shoes to even think of filling.
The church in Ephesus was comprised of several smaller house churches to make up the local church. They were not like what we think of today as large assemblies in one large building. When the early church began they met in the homes of people.EdSutton said:I must have missed this one. (Poor translation in the Bible I use, maybe?) Where is this found? I saw nothing about churches, or "leaders of the churches" in anything Paul said, at Miletus.
However, strangely, I did notice that there are multiple bishops/elders on one local church - namely the church of Ephesus. The word church is singular, here.
Ed
Your comment reminds me of the time a missionary told me about the average pastor in the country where he serves. He told me that the average pastor has been a Christian three years and pastoring for two. He also said that it is amazing how close they are doctrinally.Bob Alkire said:If any church will try and follow the lead of the Holy Spirit and be a place of teaching, care and worship all would be well. I think we forget that God's appeal is for us to live the Christian life on the basis of His provision. If we try and live the Christian life by operation bootstraps, we will fail.
In Acts 20 when Paul addresses the elders from the church of Ephesus in Miletus his God inspired message extends far more than geography. Scripture goes far deeper and beyond common sense and geography. All scripture is inspired by God and profiatble for. . ."Revmitchell said:There seems to be a lack of common sense used here.
4His_glory said:Some churches may not be able to fully salary a pastor, however it is there biblical responsibility to give him something.
So it is not a matter of tradition or culture. It is a matter of biblical obedience. churches do not pay their pastors well. But at least they do pay them something. It is difficult for them at times to understand their responsibility as a church to financially support their pastor because the state pays the Catholic priests and many think that this should be normal for evangelical pastors as well... that is until the learn the biblical mandate to support their pastor.
gb93433 said:What do you think would happen if all of the churches in America were without paid pastors?
Turn the tables on your coment and ask "How many would be pastoring if they were not paid?"Aaron said:Nothing would happen. It would only mean that no church in America loved its pastor or understood the office and its demands.
Some of their churches in the states which have gotten larger now have paid pastors.Jim1999 said:It appears that many Baptist Churches practice that famous admonition: "Lord, you keep him humble, and we'll keep him poor."
Let's drop the name Baptist and add the name Plymouth Brethren. No fear of paying wages there.
The question was, "What do you think would happen if all of the churches in America were without paid pastors?." I formed my answer from Scriptural principles, not the least of which is do not muzzle the ox that treads the corn. Ministers have the liberty to work without compensation if they so desire, but denying pastors their right to receive material compensation for their spiritual labors is not the answer to the problem of covetousness. There are many who simply covet the preeminence no matter the size or economic affluence of the group.gb93433 said:Turn the tables on your coment and ask "How many would be pastoring if they were not paid?"
I have some friends whom I have known since college. They do ministry in a church that has never had a paid pastor. That church is involved in planting new churches, long and short term missions, and sending full time missionaries. The older are teaching the younger how to do ministry. There is not arrogance in that church. The main pastor teaches the younger men how to preach and do that kind of ministry. The younger men are mostly about 50 and they train those who are younger than them. There are several generations in training. The church runs at least 300 in attendance.
Look and see what happens as a church grows and can eventually afford a paid pastor. Look and see if the people work just as hard as when it was a new church plant. If everyone worked they would understand ministry much better than those who "pay" the pastor to do that work. Imagine how many churches would no longer be "program churches" if everyone had to work instead of going because of the programs?
Think about what Paul said in Acts 20:33-35, "I have coveted no one's silver or gold or clothes. "You yourselves know that these hands ministered to my own needs and to the men who were with me. "In everything I showed you that by working hard in this manner you must help the weak and remember the words of the Lord Jesus, that He Himself said, `It is more blessed to give than to receive.' "
Aaron said:The question was, "What do you think would happen if all of the churches in America were without paid pastors?." I formed my answer from Scriptural principles, not the least of which is do not muzzle the ox that treads the corn. Ministers have the liberty to work without compensation if they so desire, but denying pastors their right to receive material compensation for their spiritual labors is not the answer to the problem of covetousness. There are many who simply covet the preeminence no matter the size or economic affluence of the group.
Generally I agree with you. Often in large churches the congregation does not know how much the salaries are because there are hidden from the congregation by being mixed with other expenses being reported. The amount of money a church pays its pastor is not always reflective of its love for him. It can also be a way of telling him what they expect him to do and how they expect to be treated. There are times when they want growth in numbers so they pay the price to get a good orator. Recently we have seen a barrage of problems in large churches the past few years.Still, how a church compensates it's ministers is a direct reflection of their love for them and their work.
It is a well known fact that bivocational pastors have more contacts than full time pastors and their churches tend to do quite well because everyone works.