Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Due to yer Canadian flag icon, I'd say he meant MONTREAL.(Just guessing)Originally posted by Ransom:
What Version do they use in Moteral?
I don't even know where "Moteral" is supposed to be, and frankly, I don't much care.
Learn to be coherent, and maybe I'll start taking you seriously. Maybe. No promises.
OK but what is the (a) (b)?Originally posted by His Blood Spoke My Name:
Matthew 7:13-15 13 (a)"Enter by the narrow gate; for the gate is wide, and the way is broad that leads to destruction, and many are those who enter by it. 14 "For the gate is small, and the way is narrow that leads to life, and few are those who find it. 15 "Beware of the (a)false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly are (b)ravenous wolves.
NASB
The French say is it is a language about 200 years behind French spoken in France.Originally posted by william s. correa:
I'm sorry I meant the French Vesion used in MONTREAL?
Man did you get up on the wrong side of the bed? What is Up with you?Originally posted by Ransom:
correa said:
I'm sorry I meant the French Vesion used in MONTREAL?
How am I supposed to know? There are more French translations of the Bible than any other language. Why do you foolishly assume every French-Canadian Christian in Montreal has the same version?
The French say is it is a language about 200 years behind French spoken in France. </font>[/QUOTE]I'm sorry I asked?Originally posted by gb93433:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by william s. correa:
I'm sorry I meant the French Vesion used in MONTREAL?
The same way you would demonstrate your conviction about ANYTHING that God convicted you about: you proclaim it then live it.Originally posted by Ransom:
Why is it scary? How does the person "receiving" these "convictions" intend to demonstrate to the rest of us that they come from the Holy Spirit and not from the world, the flesh, or the devil?
I don't remember anyone saying that they were "speaking for God."
What are this person's credentials to speak authoritatively for God?
As you might know, that is impossible. If it is the Holy Spirit then He will not lead away from the truth. Now, only one position can have this leading. I guess only heaven will tell.What is our responsibility when the "Holy Spirit" doesn't seem to square with what we already know to be true?
Congratulations.I'm Baptist, not Holiness or Pentecostal.
Again, congratulations. No one here is asking you to live by someone else's "convictions" they are just stating theirs, as you have.
My standard is Scripture, an objective and authoritative rule of faith, not someone else's "convictions."
Ah, bingo! Personally, that is the operative word. Many have stated their personal convictions, I did not read where the law was introduced into Congress. Yes it is a very personal thing, and being the brethren in Christ that we are, we like to share it. Please forgive if it so offensive. I am not offended that you receive all or most versions as God's word.
Absolutely. But if God through his Holy Spirit wants to convict me of something, he is capable of revealing that conviction to me personally or mediating it through the ministry of the Word. God is not in need of secretaries of dubious authority to get his message across.
I did say most, not all. The quote you dug up was the exception, not the rule.PhatCat said:
KJVO side:
"I understand your position... here's my position [Smile] "
". . . you apostate, liberal, crypto-Catholic, gay-loving, Bible-less, unbelieving, Alexandrian Cultist."
You're being disingenuous, PhatCat, and you know it.
It is well that you can use the KJV w/o messing with the garbage of the KJVO myth.Originally posted by Soulman:
I am KJP. I am confident that the KJB is the Word of God. I see no reason to change. I am not sure about some of the other versions. I know many of them are faulty. I will stick with what has been working well for 37 years. The KJB.
I wouldn't depend on it.....Originally posted by Keith M:
Cranston, it is apparently true that Mr. Correa falls for everything he reads or hears that promotes the KJVO myth, but I don't think he's naive enough to fall for the garbage in The Da Vinci Code...