[
The "Anointing of the Sick" sacrament is as follows. In paragraph 1523 entitled: A preparation for the final journey, the Church says: "If the sacrament of the anointing of the sick is given to all who suffer from serious illness..........even more rightly is it given to those at the point of departing this life.......". And: "..... This last anointing fortifies the end of our earthly life like a solid rampart for the final struggles before entering the Father's house". What in heaven's name is wrong with that teaching?
But let us go to the Scriptures shall we? "Is any among you sick? Let him call for the presbyters of the Church, and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord; and the prayer of faith will save the sick man, and the Lord will raise him up; and if he has committed sins, he will be forgiven". (James 5: 14-15).
Don't you pray for family members and friends who are sick or dying? I sure hope so, and the Church as a whole does likewise.
Unfortunately, the magisterium changes its mind on such things. Pre-Vatican II, the Latin Rite tended to lump the anointing mentioned in James with the "last rites." The modern practice is that anointing should be applied to the sick, even though they may not be at death's door. That, in fact, is in line with James' teaching.
The concept of "last rites," of course, is without any foundation in scripture, except that it extends the priest's ability to forgive sin (yes, I know he doesn't actually "forgive sin" because he's simply exercising the power supposedly given him, but that's a really dangerous road to go down because you're assuming that the priest has not only authority by also the knowledge of God; but I digress).
If a person wants a priest, or a Baptist pastor, as death approaches, that's fine with me (though I see no particular efficacy other than providing comfort). But to put people in fear of their eternal destination without the participation of a priest or pastor is just wrong and contrary to the spirit of the New Testament.