• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

What happened to you?

Jarthur001

Active Member
On another thread Havensdad said...

Amen! I held to the "Arminian" position for years. Finally, after having the weight of scripture pressed down upon me, I bowed my head and prayed "Lord if this is true, convince me". I spent a huge number of hours, searching the scriptures with an open mind, and simply was unable to refute it.

I want to ask other Calvinist here what it was like when they 1st gave themself over to fully embrace the Doctrines of Grace.

Once a month I meet with other Reformed pastors to fellowship pray and talk about our ministy. We also read a book and talk about it. A few months ago we all read "What's so great about the Doctrines of Grace. This is a very good short read and overview of the doctrines. It is something good to pass out for those that are just beginning to understand the doctrines we love.

In the book the writer told of this feeling that came over him just after he gave himself over to the doctrines. He said it was like a new birth, or maybe he said..rebirth feeling. (i do not have my book with me). Like he was saved all over again. When I read this I said..YES YES...I can relate.

I recall it brought me to my knees and I cried for an hour or more. Now the interesting part is this. Each pastor in our fellowship told of the same story.

How about other Calvinist? What happened to you if anything? Please share your story.
 

ReformedBaptist

Well-Known Member
Good thread Jarth,

I didn't have the same kind of experience like you describe, but it was no less profound to me. One of the things I realized was that I was very, very inconsistent "arminian" All of my convictions were strictly "calvinist" but I talked like an evangelical arminian. What changed my understanding of how God saves a man was seeing His sovereignty in Scripture. I had seen on the internet some of the debate and understood to a small degree what calvinism was, but I wasn't going to commit myself to a theology apart from the Word of God.

So I started reading the Bible beginning in Genesis asking the Lord to reveal Himself to me and, if He will, show me one way or the other about the CA issue. When I got to Pharoah in Exodus and looked at how the Apostle Paul interprets that passage I could not refute it. And then I realized something: WHY AM I TRYING TO REFUTE THIS?

I submitted my reasoning, pride, and rebellion to the Lord. Who was I to reply against God? After this I started looking into those who believed the same way and that is where I found the writings of C.H. Spurgeon. I found that he taught on these subjects. I read his sermon on election and was deeply moved by it. I had never heard the doctrine of election preached in a church before and Spurgeon's work on it was thorough.

THe doctrines of grace were easy for me to accept, though I struggled a bit with Limited Atonement. They were easy for me to accept because my own salvation answered back to those five points with a hearty AMEN! The doctrines of Grace, that is, Calvinism, so far and above bring glory to God than the other views I wonder why Christians don't receive it just on that.

By the way, what moved my understanding of the atonement from the false universal idea to particular redemption was Jesus' prayer in John 17. You cannot separate Christ's intercession from His redemption without doing horrible injustice to the Scriptures.

Edited to add in: One form of teaching that is having a profound impact on my life is understanding the Covenants, or what some would call Covenant Theology. Understanding that God has related to mankind by Covenant is amazing. Knowing that God has made a Covenant with me is profoundly humbling.

RB
 
Last edited by a moderator:

TCGreek

New Member
Well, a fellow baptist pastor and I would be dealing with the issues from Scripture.

I would be asking him questions from my Arminian bent and he would be demonstrating from Scripture the doctrines of grace.

The hardest one to put my mind around was Unconditional election, but one I saw it, everything else began to jell.

Now, I've gone passed him regarding Limited Atonement. He's open to being a 4-pointer here. But I'm a 5-pointer all the way.
 

Jarthur001

Active Member
ReformedBaptist said:
By the way, what moved my understanding of the atonement from the false universal idea to particular redemption was Jesus' prayer in John 17. You cannot separate Christ's intercession from His redemption without doing horrible injustice to the Scriptures.


RB
It was 1Cor 13 for me. :)

God is love
Love never fails.


Thanks for sharing. Do we have any more stories out there?
 

Jarthur001

Active Member
TCGreek said:
Well, a fellow baptist pastor and I would be dealing with the issues from Scripture.

I would be asking him questions from my Arminian bent and he would be demonstrating from Scripture the doctrines of grace.

The hardest one to put my mind around was Unconditional election, but one I saw it, everything else began to jell.

Now, I've gone passed him regarding Limited Atonement. He's open to being a 4-pointer here. But I'm a 5-pointer all the way.
Hello TC,

That is interesting. Most Calvinist I have talked with have the biggest struggle over the atonement. Election was not really hard for me.

Thanks for sharing
 

nunatak

New Member
I came out of heresy last year. One of the first persons I began discussing biblical doctrine with was reformed and loved to teach from Martin Luther.

Soon after that, I watched the Amazing Grace DVD. Needless to say, I was stunned.

I had never heard of

Salvation by grace
Justification by faith
Dead in trespasses and sin
Atonement that is limited (at one time I thought the fact that some would be lost was a failure of the church)
That the saints would persevere.

Oh, what joy I knew!! I don't understand much of what I just typed, it is all so new.

It is truly amazing.
 

skypair

Active Member
Has it occurred to any of you...

...that, perhaps, the "doctrines of grace" are merely a "derivative" of the gospel and of scripture?

...that somehow the Armenians were able to "derive" their theology from the same Bible you derived yours from?

When oil is refined, we process it so that it makes diesel, gasoline, etc. and there are "leftovers," like minute amounts of natural gas and impurities that are not worth collecting so they are sent to the "cracking tower" for burning into the atmosphere.

What has the "doctrines of grace" done with "WHOSOEVER believeth on Him should not perish but have everlasting life?" Is "whosoever" just a "throwaway word?"

If regeneration precedes faith, then what happened to "Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and [then] ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost."

We have these "derivatives" (we usually call them 'denominations') because some thought they could explain the Bible better than others. And many seemed to, too! Some liked that eschatology could be explained to them. Some that election could be understood better. Others thought to explain the role of works better.

But see, by doing so, we fail to come to the "unity in the knowledge and faith of Jesus Christ" that is called for in the church by scripture. You've very much made a "line in the sand" against your brothers which, like Pharoah, turns around to harm you.

Now, I guess I should add that this is not a personal attack on any of you. It is merely a lengthy question as to whether you have considered these issues.

skypair
 

JerryL

New Member
skypair said:
that somehow the Armenians were able to "derive" their theology from the same Bible you derived yours from?
I would guess that a lot "Armenians" don't even read a Bible. :tongue3:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Tom Butler

New Member
I guess it was more than 35 years ago that I borrowed a book on Systematic Theology from my pastor. It didn't start with Calvinism; it started with the existence of God, with chapters on his nature and his attributes.

By the time I got to the chapter on election, I had been sufficiently prepared, and thus could see how it fit in a systematic way. The treatment of the other parts of the TULIP also made sense.

Full of enthusiam for my new discovery, I raised the issue with an associate pastor. His bristled and responded, "well, you can believe that stuff but it won't preach."

When we were without a pastor, I taught on the subject of Election in a Sunday evening Bible Study. In the service to follow, I was publicly corrected by the interim pastor.

Why did I embrace Calvinism then and not before? One reason is that I had never been exposed to it before. But once I read about it, I believe it was the work of the Holy Spirit to open my eyes to the truth.
 

AresMan

Active Member
Site Supporter
skypair said:
What has the "doctrines of grace" done with "WHOSOEVER believeth on Him should not perish but have everlasting life?" Is "whosoever" just a "throwaway word?"
The word whosoever means nothing apart from the attached action. It is whosoever believeth, or in the Greek πας ο πιστευων ("all the believers"). God loved the world so that all the believers into Him would have everlasting life. The same Jesus who said this is the same Jesus who said the following:

Joh 6:40 And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life: and I will raise him up at the last day.
This sounds rather similar to John 3:16, doesn't it? Now, what else does Jesus say in this passage?

Joh 6:63 It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.
Joh 6:64 But there are some of you that believe not. For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were that believed not, and who should betray him.
Joh 6:65 And he said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.
No one can come unless he is given the ability (or desire) to come. Now, what is characteristic of those that do come?

Joh 6:44 No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day.
They are drawn by the Father. Do all those who are drawn by the Father in this definition come, or are those who come merely a subset of those who are drawn? Well, the antecedent of the the him that is raised up at the last day is the him who is drawn by the Father. Therefore, all who are drawn by the Father in this definition come to the Son.

Joh 6:37 All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.
All that the Father gives to the Son shall come; then, all those who do come will not be cast out. The terms for the Father drawing and the Father giving to the Son are synonomous in reference to the set of their object. All who are drawn by the Father and given to the Son will come to the Son.

Joh 6:39 And this is the Father's will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day.
Those who are referenced in 40 are said to be raised at the last day. They see the Son and believe on Him. Those who are referenced as will be "raised up at the last day" must be all the same people; therefore, all the statements made about the ones "raised up at the last day" must all be characteristic of those who see the Son and believe. The ones who ultimately see the Son and believe are drawn by the Father, given to the Son, and will never be cast out.

Joh 6:45 It is written in the prophets, And they shall be all taught of [or, from] God. Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath learned of [or, from] the Father, cometh unto me.
The source of the knowledge and faith of the Gospel comes from the Father. All who will be "raised up at the last day" are drawn by the Father, taught the Gospel, given to the Son, they see and believe, and will never be cast out.

John 6 is shockingly clear that the reason that anyone believes the Gospel is because of an effectual work of God on his part and within him to make it happen. The ones who see the Son, believe, and will be raised up at the last day are the same ones who, of themselves, cannot come unless the Father draws them (an effectual act of God), teaches them His truth (an effectual act of God), and gives them to the Son (an effectual act of God). Their seeing and believing the Son, and coming to Him are just as much effectual works of God as are His drawing, teaching giving, securing, and raising. Salvation from start to finish is an effectual act of God. God gets all the glory! Not most of it, but ALL of it!

skypair said:
If regeneration precedes faith, then what happened to "Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and [then] ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost."
What about "Be ye perfect as I the Lord am perfect"? Just because God commands something does not mean that it is easy or possible for one to do it. Also, one is not indwelt by the Holy Spirit until he exercises the gift of faith in the Gospel.

Eph 2:1 And you hath he quickened [made alive], who were dead in trespasses and sins
Eph 2:2 Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience:
Eph 2:3 Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others.
Eph 2:4 But God, who is rich in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us,
Eph 2:5 Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved;)
Eph 2:6 And hath raised us up together, and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus:
Eph 2:7 That in the ages to come he might show the exceeding riches of his grace in his kindness toward us through Christ Jesus.
Eph 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that [the whole phrase] not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:
Eph 2:9 Not of works, lest any man should boast.
Eph 2:10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.
This all sounds like an effectual work of God on the part of certain people. "Regeneration precede faith" is not a chronological statement; it is a cause-effect statement. I believe that regeneration and faith are chronologically simultaneous, but regeneration is the cause and faith is the effect--like pulling a trigger on a gun is a cause and a bullet firing is the effect.

Phi 1:6 Being confident of this very thing, that he which hath begun a good work in you will perform it until the day of Jesus Christ:

Phi 2:12 Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.
Phi 2:13 For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure.

Rom 8:28 And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, [i.e.] to them who are the called according to his purpose.
Rom 8:29 For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.
Rom 8:30 Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified.
Rom 8:31 What shall we then say to these things? If God be for us, who can be against us?
Rom 8:32 He that spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us all, how shall he not with him also freely give us all things?
Rom 8:33 Who shall lay any thing to the charge of God's elect? It is God that justifieth.
Rom 8:34 Who is he that condemneth? It is Christ that died, yea rather, that is risen again, who is even at the right hand of God, who also maketh intercession for us.
We cannot claim any credit for the ultimate fact that we are saved. Our faith, our justification, our sanctification, our glorification--ALL of it comes from God. God and God alone gets all the glory for anything that has to do with our pleasing Him.
 

ReformedBaptist

Well-Known Member
skypair said:
...that, perhaps, the "doctrines of grace" are merely a "derivative" of the gospel and of scripture?

...that somehow the Armenians were able to "derive" their theology from the same Bible you derived yours from?

When oil is refined, we process it so that it makes diesel, gasoline, etc. and there are "leftovers," like minute amounts of natural gas and impurities that are not worth collecting so they are sent to the "cracking tower" for burning into the atmosphere.

What has the "doctrines of grace" done with "WHOSOEVER believeth on Him should not perish but have everlasting life?" Is "whosoever" just a "throwaway word?"

If regeneration precedes faith, then what happened to "Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and [then] ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost."

We have these "derivatives" (we usually call them 'denominations') because some thought they could explain the Bible better than others. And many seemed to, too! Some liked that eschatology could be explained to them. Some that election could be understood better. Others thought to explain the role of works better.

But see, by doing so, we fail to come to the "unity in the knowledge and faith of Jesus Christ" that is called for in the church by scripture. You've very much made a "line in the sand" against your brothers which, like Pharoah, turns around to harm you.

Now, I guess I should add that this is not a personal attack on any of you. It is merely a lengthy question as to whether you have considered these issues.

skypair

Why did you reply this way SP? This reply is off-topic. There are plenty of other threads to debate calvinism. Let's keep this one on the OP please.

RB
 
Top