People who agree with me are no doubt scholars, people who disagree are unstudied imposters. Thus on this board we get copy and paste screed in support of whatever view is being promoted. And if I disagree, my knowledge and qualifications and character are questioned. Scholars study the information available, formulate a working hypothesis, and publicly state their view of the truth of the matter. Others, posing as scholars, selectively use facts in support of a view, prepared like a legal brief, rather than a scientific study. You know you are dealing with a seeker of victory, rather than a seeker of truth, when fallacies are used.
Try as I may, I could not find anything to nitpick in the OP, so of course it was a scholarly post...