ChristianCynic
<img src=/cc2.jpg>
I have aleady answered the question from Acts 2:38 one is baptized by the authority of Jesus Christ.
"By the authority of..." or "in the name of..."? Which is stated in Acts 2:38? and was{were} there name{s} which were declared at your baptism? and what was it {were they}?
As for your question about signs following, the promise was not made to me, but the apostles.
If the promise was not made to you, then you are not among "them that believe," of which the signs are evident... or else this passage does not belong in the canon.
And then miracles, healing, tongues, et al, were endowed and used at Corinth as I Corinthians 12 indicates.
And then as to confirmation, unmistakable miracles are confirmation, but definitely not the junk seen today such as healing a stomach or back ache... it would take someone with a missing arm or leg being replaced in view to get me to believe any 'healing' is a "miracle." And that would be a confirmation. The Bible, on the other hand, does not confirm anything unless a person has already been persuaded by someone or by some means that it is true. And obviously people believe in the 'truth' of many other books of miraculous acconts which cannot be duplicated today. So the Bible does not qualify as evidence if its "miracles" cannot be proven. I think you are brainwashed and nothing else.
"By the authority of..." or "in the name of..."? Which is stated in Acts 2:38? and was{were} there name{s} which were declared at your baptism? and what was it {were they}?
As for your question about signs following, the promise was not made to me, but the apostles.
If the promise was not made to you, then you are not among "them that believe," of which the signs are evident... or else this passage does not belong in the canon.
And then miracles, healing, tongues, et al, were endowed and used at Corinth as I Corinthians 12 indicates.
And then as to confirmation, unmistakable miracles are confirmation, but definitely not the junk seen today such as healing a stomach or back ache... it would take someone with a missing arm or leg being replaced in view to get me to believe any 'healing' is a "miracle." And that would be a confirmation. The Bible, on the other hand, does not confirm anything unless a person has already been persuaded by someone or by some means that it is true. And obviously people believe in the 'truth' of many other books of miraculous acconts which cannot be duplicated today. So the Bible does not qualify as evidence if its "miracles" cannot be proven. I think you are brainwashed and nothing else.