The scripture teaches also that God blinds the wise
Why does He blind the wise? Doesn't he want them to be saved too?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
The scripture teaches also that God blinds the wise
Do you think He blinded them for a particular purpose, or do you think He blinded the wise for all time?Why does He blind the wise? Doesn't he want them to be saved too?
First off, He witnesses to each person who is accountable because every such one is given an awareness of Him in their conscience/soul.
Brother Bob said:Do you think He blinded them for a particular purpose, or do you think He blinded the wise for all time?
It's not a theory J.D. - Who were those thousands of believers (and I don't just mean in Acts 2) who came unto salvation first (as in before the gentiles). They were Jews.J.D. said:Allan, I've come to expect these wacky theories from some around here, but you too?
Deal with the WORDS of scripture. "Ye CANNOT believe".
Yes but they are wise in their own eyes (their own conciets due to worldly wisdom). Now that point can be argued from either point (though both are true statements) but I just want to establish that this scripture is not stating or meaning ALL the wise are blinded.J.D. said:Why does He blind the wise? Doesn't he want them to be saved too?
There must of been a reason for Him to set this group apart
Brother Bob said:Well, if He blinded them then He would have to make them able to see. There must of been a reason for Him to set this group apart from all others, I mean it is saying all others can already "see".
This does not say they were without opportunity but that in light of the truth they had, those who DID NOT believe were without excuse. This is speaking of those who would be going to judgment for their rejection of the truth they had and their sentence is a Just punishment BECAUSE they were without excuse for they COULD have believed. This is why it does not show they were without opportunity but that by opportunity they were without excuse.J.D. said:I will agree with that for the sake of argument, but does "an awareness of Him" enough to bring them to repentance and faith? What does Romans 1-3 tell us about those folks who are without excuse? It says even though they "knew" Him in His eternal power and Godhead (His basic attributes), they immediately turned away from Him. So obviously this "universal witness" alone was not sufficient to save them.
Yes they are accountable and by proxy able. Responsibility ALWAYS bears with it ability. This has always been understood in any language and culture. Just look it up. You CANNOT have responsiblity APART from Ability. However I do agree that abilitly can be limited to and by the amount of knowledge one has. This is the very reason Paul states that those without the Law are a law unto themselves ... and that they are still without excuse because creation itself bears enough truth to lead them to see there is a specific singular and unique God (The Creator) and if they will believe even that much God will already be sending someone to them that they may hear ALL of His truth concerning 'the' everlasting Truth who is Christ Jesus.And yes, this does make them accountable. All of mankind stands condemned before the Holy God, because He has proven to them that they have a Higher Power, a "Head", who's law they've rebelled against. Mankind is universally conscious of their own sinfulness. But their reaction is also universal. To hide their sin they turn to the fig leaves of religion or denial. They set up substitute gods and systems of human good works and self-atonement. Mankind continues on this path till they reach the end of their rebellion - death, and are rewarded according to their works.
This is true for it is Christ that saves and it is the gospel that reveals Him.Nothing in Romans 1-3 allows for sinfull man to be saved under this universal revelation.
That is an incorrect assumption. Man is responsible with accepting or rejecting the truths with God has revealed. Works have never saved a man even under the Law. But it was the truth of the Law that revealed God or better the Word that was a light unto them. But light is not enough to save them only reveal. The Word gives light but it is the Spirit that gives life - Amen? And Jesus is both the Word (light) and the God who gives life. This is why through Him (revealed truth) we may see but is by Him we are saved (given life eternal). As you can see this is why AFTER Christ left light is throught the gospel message OF Jesus and salvation is given via the Holy Spirit.It is a revelation which only condemns. If man had the ability to be saved under it, he would inheret eternal life "by patient continuance in doing good".
That is right. Man can not of himself nor by himself save himself. It is God that saves man, but man must believe or man IS NOT saved, no??Salvation can only come by grace. A gift. Nothing in the natural man.
No one says that. (ok almost no one - but I'm talking mainline Baptist non-cals)But some will say "I have faith, that is MY contribution to salvation". It may be your in possession, but not in origination. "It is the gift of God" Eph 2.
Everyone who has believed as is according to scripture; and another one is those who received Him...Consider this: "who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation..."
Only if you believe those are your only two alternitives (it is called a false dicotamy but you know that!)If this faith spoken of here is a human-originated faith, then the Arminians are right, we can lose our salvation if we lose our faith. If faith is the means to the end, the end being "salvation", then we will lose salvation if we lose our faith.
that is one VIEW of it yes, though not one most believe is the most scripturally accurate view.But we notice the scripture says "by the power of God". So what is the relationship of faith to the power of God? It's simple - saving faith comes from God; it is His provision for us, the means by which He delivers us to glory. That is why we cannot be lost. We are saved by His power through faith, which is not of ourselves, but is the gift of God. But go ahead, boast of YOUR faith by which you are saved, if you dare.
You are just scratching the surface of what "blind" means. I believe it is a physiological as well as psychological response that God has instilled in man. If your house becomes messy, you notice it at first, but if you continue to live in it in that state, you will become "blind" to the situation you have created. I saw something recently on Animal Planet. A woman kept adopting cats until she had over 50. There was 3 feet of garbage and cat droppings in her house. They asked her how she could live like that, and she replied she didn't even notice it. The same thing happens with Gospel truth. If ignored enough, one becomes "hardened" and "blind" to the truths therein...all as a result of how God programmed us.But my question here is: if God wants them to be saved, why did he blind them? Why did God say that they CANNOT believe?
He said He blinded them for this reason and for His purpose.But my question here is: if God wants them to be saved, why did he blind them? Why did God say that they CANNOT believe?
I believe after. That is, if you don't believe what you hear, you're not convicted, are you? Yes, the Spirit convicts. Yes. The Spirit, of course.J.D. said:Does conviction come before or after belief? The Spirit does the convicting, right? Weren't you convicted of your sins, then you repented? What power wrought conviction in your heart?
Here's where "belief in vain" comes in -- when you believe but are not convicted to do anything about it, you believe in vain. Does that mean the Spirit wasn't "calling?" No, it's just that you weren't filled with the Spirit. Your mind started to look at the life you will lose, right? It is "double-minded" as scripture says ("let such an one not think that he will receive anything of the Lord" Jas 1:7). You "acknowledge" the truth but it doesn't "move" your will. I heard the gospel several times before I received. I'm sure that is true of a lot of readers here.If you can believe in Christ in your own natural ability, then you only need the word, not the Spirit.
No, because you can believe intellectually and it not change your will, right? That's why I see the need for the Spirit to "fill" you before you can repent and receive.The preaching of the word should be sufficient in speaking to our good senses whereby we can make a rational decision to follow Christ. True?
I hope the previous was responsive to this issue.If so, why does God send His Spirit into the world to convince men of sin?
Now you appear to obviate the power of the Spirit, JD. Think about it -- even a man with hatred in his heart (like my FiL, a lost man, who hated God because God didn't answer his prayer once. Happens all the time. :tears: ). He hears the gospel -- he believes by the filling of the Spirit (that is, into conviction) -- do you think whatever else was in his mind, emotions, and will is going to be a consideration? Not if he sees that his mind, emotions and will are what got in the way (he is convicted of sin, righteousness and judgment), right?Does anyone have the ability to choose that which he does not desire? If a man has nothing but hatred in his heart for God, does he have the ability to come to God by his own choice?
Your account of it makes it sound as if it were something in you. Do you consider yourself to have been "elect" all along and them not? That would be a difference, right?And if the ability to choose rightly has been given to every person, how come none of my friends were saved on the night that I was saved? They heard the same sermon, sat on the same pew, but none of them were effected. In fact, they got a big laugh out of the whole thing. What made the difference between me and them? Was there something good in me, did I have more sense, more intelligence?
This is the "drawing" that Calvinists are looking for. It's the "first stage." Do you see that? If they would overcome their conviction and come closer, God would reveal more! Light accepted brings more light -- light rejected brings darkness. You've heard that, right? It's scriptural -- I'll dig it out if you like. EVeryone, like Moses, has the option of turning aside when they see the "burning bush."J.D. said:I will agree with that for the sake of argument, but does "an awareness of Him" enough to bring them to repentance and faith?
Rom 1-3 is lacking in that it doesn't tell us what would happen if, rather than turn away, they were drawn to Him -- God's Spirit witnessing in their spirit right from the get-go.It says even though they "knew" Him in His eternal power and Godhead (His basic attributes), they immediately turned away from Him. So obviously this "universal witness" alone was not sufficient to save them.
Now you know that is not true. Are you not a man? Did you turn to your own sinfulness or to God??Mankind is universally conscious of their own sinfulness. But their reaction is also universal.
A lot do as you say - not all else there would be no "elect." All of our "first inclinations" are to do what you say, but in the end, some of us believe.To hide their sin they turn to the fig leaves of religion or denial. They set up substitute gods and systems of human good works and self-atonement. Mankind continues on this path till they reach the end of their rebellion - death, and are rewarded according to their works.
Like I said, Rom 1-3 only gives the negative response.Nothing in Romans 1-3 allows for sinfull man to be saved under this universal revelation.
Grace, by defintion, is a gift, of course. And in salvation, it does appear that God does all the giving. He gives faith, spiritual gifts, the Holy Spirit, eternal life, a glorified body, blessings, on and on! :godisgood: But the one thing God can't give us is BELIEF. We either believe and receive or we don't.Salvation can only come by grace. A gift. Nothing in the natural man.
Absolutely!! God GIVES us faith in exchange for our belief. Belief is not a work on our part, BTW (Rom 4:5).But we notice the scripture says "by the power of God". So what is the relationship of faith to the power of God? It's simple - saving faith comes from God; it is His provision for us, the means by which He delivers us to glory. That is why we cannot be lost. We are saved by His power through faith, which is not of ourselves, but is the gift of God.
Now that's uncalled for, JD.But go ahead, boast of YOUR faith by which you are saved, if you dare.
This does not say they were without opportunity but that in light of the truth they had, those who DID NOT believe were without excuse. This is speaking of those who would be going to judgment for their rejection of the truth they had and their sentence is a Just punishment BECAUSE they were without excuse for they COULD have believed. This is why it does not show they were without opportunity but that by opportunity they were without excuse.
(I added the bold and underline)
Responsibility ALWAYS bears with it ability.
This has always been understood in any language and culture.
I've already read a lot of that stuff by Plato and Socrates and Adam Smith and Dewey and Rand and Hegel etc.Just look it up.
No one says that. (ok almost no one - but I'm talking mainline Baptist non-cals)
(it is called a false dicotamy but you know that!)
Mankind is universally conscious of their own sinfulness. But their reaction is also universal.
Believe me, in my eyes, your responses too are unorthodox yet I take the time to answer. It's called "longsuffering" and "patience" with one another. Most of my responses were short and to the point and asked your for POV, which I am trying to understand as well. J.D. -- I'm laying a "burden" on you which must be borne by us all -- to find the truth. Calvinism appeared shortly after the Bible was accessible and it is no wonder at all that interpretation was in its infancy -- especially from one who drew from Augustine as Calvin did. Reform went beyond Catholicism in understanding. Do you not detect in scripture that there is something "beyond" Calvinism??J.D. said:Skypair, your responses are becoming too unorthodox for me to answer. Too many errors. They drain my energy. I don't mean that disrespectfully, just theologically.
skypair said:Believe me, in my eyes, your responses too are unorthodox yet I take the time to answer. It's called "longsuffering" and "patience" with one another. Most of my responses were short and to the point and asked your for POV, which I am trying to understand as well. J.D. -- I'm laying a "burden" on you which must be borne by us all -- to find the truth. Calvinism appeared shortly after the Bible was accessible and it is no wonder at all that interpretation was in its infancy -- especially from one who drew from Augustine as Calvin did. Reform went beyond Catholicism in understanding. Do you not detect in scripture that there is something "beyond" Calvinism??
Please go back and try to give me the courtesy that I gave to your long-winded posts.Unorthodox doesn't mean untrue.
Also, Have you considered what Christ said about Sardis lately. "You have a name that liveth but art dead." Sardis IS the architypical Reform/Calvinist church. They DO have the name of Jesus, but since they refuse to "receive" Him (on account they can have do part in their own salvation), they are still "dead." Please come to your senses on this, J.D., or at least prove to yourself and me that you are not part of Sardis.
skypair