What should the White House do with all media leaks?

[Happy]

Newt Gingrich's Congress impeaching Clinton for perjuring himself over Lewinsky Scandal.



Revealing classified and highly sensitive information to a potential enemy state such as Russia is very disconcerting. It worries me way more than Clinton lying about Lewinksy. You may not have a problem with it and that is your right as an America to disagree, but I and many others, on the Republican and Democrat side of politics do.

Lying under oath is a felony and an impeachable offense, which Clinton committed, and you, not unlike most Liberals, you reveal you have no concern for the rule of law.

A President having a discussion with foreign dignitaries is a lawful way government officials conduct government business.

There are no reports of Trump doing anything illegal or acting in a manner that would be Constitutional grounds for impeachment, but not unlike most Liberals, you reveal gossip tickles your ears and think that your opinions should have legal standing. They don't.

 

[Crabtownboy]

I'll wait and see if you respond to what "that" information is, according to you.



Well actually, while you are all worried about Trump revealing "harmful" information....
"harmful" meaning....a harm to the US or a harm to Americans....
I guess you "forgot", such a harm, would INCLUDE, Trump "harming" himself, which makes the whole accusation prime for a comedy.

Now, again, if you were in a foreign government would you advise that government to share sensitive information with the US while Trump is president?

 

[Happy]

Now, again, if you were in a foreign government would you advise that government to share sensitive information with the US while Trump is president?

I see you have avoided the few questions I asked you.
So why are you asking me questions?
Do you expect an answer when you do not answer?

 

[Crabtownboy]

I see you have avoided the few questions I asked you.
So why are you asking me questions?
Do you expect an answer when you do not answer?

I've answered a number of your questions. I expect you to be polite enough to answer mine.

I must have missed some of your questions. Please answer my question and then ask the one I missed. If they are rational and intelligent I will answer them. If they are sophomoric I probably will not attempt to answer them.

 

[Happy]

I've answered a number of your questions. I expect you to be polite enough to answer mine.

I must have missed some of your questions. Please answer my question and then ask the one I missed. If they are rational and intelligent I will answer them. If they are sophomoric I probably will not attempt to answer them.

Your question...

Now, again, if you were in a foreign government would you advise that government to share sensitive information with the US while Trump is president?

IF I were in a "foreign government", I would abide by the law that allows me to share ANY particular information with foreign governments.

My questions...

Could you specifically identify.... the LEAKED, supposed information, you are referring to as "the" information ?
Who specifically claimed it was LEAKED, and not something well known ?

Oh, and also answer the questions about...

IOW - what WAS the "foreign policy", you obviously knew he would "change", and precisely what did he "change the foreign policy to", that has harmed America?

and what does COZY specifically mean to you in the context YOU applied it to Trump and Russia?

 

[Bro. Curtis]

You will never receive an answer. He may even claim he answered it in another thread. Or he will claim your questions are sophomoric. SNIP

 

[Crabtownboy]

Your question...


IF I were in a "foreign government", I would abide by the law that allows me to share ANY particular information with foreign governments.

My questions...

Could you specifically identify.... the LEAKED, supposed information, you are referring to as "the" information ?
Who specifically claimed it was LEAKED, and not something well known ?

Oh, and also answer the questions about...

IOW - what WAS the "foreign policy", you obviously knew he would "change", and precisely what did he "change the foreign policy to", that has harmed America?

and what does COZY specifically mean to you in the context YOU applied it to Trump and Russia?

Go back. I answered your question. Guess it was not the answer you hoped for.

 

[Happy]

You will never receive an answer. He may even claim he answered it in another thread. Or he will claim your questions are sophomoric. SNIP

Well, without him and one particular other, I probably wouldn't get the latest on all the Liberal psychobabble....lol. I haven't bought or thumbed through an American Newspaper for years and don't have a bird that requires poo paper for its cage.

 

[Brent W]

Lying under oath is a felony and an impeachable offense, which Clinton committed, and you, not unlike most Liberals, you reveal you have no concern for the rule of law.

A President having a discussion with foreign dignitaries is a lawful way government officials conduct government business.

There are no reports of Trump doing anything illegal or acting in a manner that would be Constitutional grounds for impeachment, but not unlike most Liberals, you reveal gossip tickles your ears and think that your opinions should have legal standing. They don't.

I never said he shouldn't have been impeached I just personally view the behavior and actions of this President so far much more dangerous than what Clinton did. IMO both deserve impeachment. You can disagree with me but do not call me a liberal just because you are too simple minded to come up with any other response to my opinion.

Again, if you continue to call me a liberal when I have repeatedly told you I am not, I am going to assume you are calling me a liar. It is unfair to me and others who continue to try to have conversations with you and others on here to resort to incorrectly labeling others you disagree with. Its frustrating and immature on your part.

 

[Happy]

I never said he shouldn't have been impeached I just personally view the behavior and actions of this President so far much more dangerous than what Clinton did. IMO both deserve impeachment. You can disagree with me but do not call me a liberal just because you are too simple minded to come up with any other response to my opinion.

Again, if you continue to call me a liberal when I have repeatedly told you I am not, I am going to assume you are calling me a liar. It is unfair to me and others who continue to try to have conversations with you and others on here to resort to incorrectly labeling others you disagree with. Its frustrating and immature on your part.

Well ya I disagree with you. The law provides grounds for impeachment, not personal opinions.
Sometimes a pat on the head soothes people who are frustrated.

 

[Happy]

Go back. I answered your question. Guess it was not the answer you hoped for.

No you did not.

 

[Brent W]

Well ya I disagree with you. The law provides grounds for impeachment, not personal opinions.
Sometimes a pat on the head soothes people who are frustrated.

Obstruction of Justice is an impeachable offense.

What I am frustrated with is your inability to not falsely label people.

 

[Crabtownboy]

The Comey memo is the first "smoking gun" found. I expect there will be more.

Brent is correct, obstruction of justice is an impeachable offense.

 

[Happy]

Obstruction of Justice is an impeachable offense.

And?

What I am frustrated with is your inability to not falsely label people.

Would you like to QUOTE me "Labeling you" ?

 

[Reynolds]

Why the Trump White House isn't leak-proof

Ever since Trump became President, there have been numerous leaks regarding meetings, things POTUS says, etc. If you were President, and had the kind of "media leaks" this Administration has had, what would you do, and when a leak is identified, what should be done with leaker?

I'll tell you what I would do, and it would involve terminating every person held over from the Obama administration. Then, I'd put everything on hold, accept for foreign relation issues, and hire a ton of people to take over for the employees no longer on payroll. And I think I'd start hiring ex military personnel who have similar duties and training while on active duty.

Like Reagan, who hired a ton of new air traffic control persons, replace my the staff with loyal,deserving employees. Of course, if Trump did this, the Dems and media would have a field day, like they are having witheverything else Trump's WH does.

1. Prove the leaked infirmation damaged national security.
2. Prosecute the leaked and put him/her in the Federal pen.

 

[Reynolds]

How's that Wall coming along?
How's that Muslim travel ban coming along?
How's that tax reform plan coming along?
How's that deportation of illegals coming along?
How's that infrastructure program doing?
How about getting rid of NAFTA? Or renegotiating it?
How about renegotiating the Iran deal?
How about absolutely destroying ISIS and taking their oil?

Its all coming along well. Just hide and watch.

 

[Crabtownboy]

1. Prove the leaked onformatuo damaged national security.
2. Prosecute the leaked and put him/her in the Federal pen.

Prove it didn't!

 

[InTheLight]

Its all coming along well. Just hide and watch.

Would you please set a date indicating your satisfaction with progress on these items? Something like, "If they are digging holes and sinking footings for the Wall by July 1, 2019, I will be happy with the progress."

Or

"If there is a vote in the House on a tax cut plan by November 1, 2018 I will be happy with the progress."

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

 

[HankD]

How's that Wall coming along?
How's that Muslim travel ban coming along?
How's that tax reform plan coming along?
How's that deportation of illegals coming along?
How's that infrastructure program doing?
How about getting rid of NAFTA? Or renegotiating it?
How about renegotiating the Iran deal?
How about absolutely destroying ISIS and taking their oil?

Each of these is coming along fine, especially when compared to our "lead from behind" previous commander-in-chief.

Each of these elements would be doing much better had it not been all the disruption from the leftist arm of the DNC and their treasonous release of WH data accompanied with false news, Alinsky style propaganda, marxist press smear campaigns, lies and deception.

President Trump's peccadilloes are minuscule compared to the treason of those releasing/leaking WH classified information.

HankD

 

[InTheLight]

Each of these is coming along fine, especially when compared to our "lead from behind" previous commander-in-chief.

Where are you getting your information that these items are progressing?

For example, what's the latest specific progress made on tax reform?



Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk