What Time Is It?

As I said, it happens after the resurrection on the last day.

 

You are making the mistake (typical) of forcing a physical interpretation onto a spiritual book. In fact, adding to it something that is not there. Armageddon is a symbol of spiritual warfare.

 

Thinking this verse shows amil shows profound ignorance of Christ's teaching about the kingdom of God and prophecy. "The kingdom of God is within you" (Luke 17:21), but David's throne was and is physical.

And I'm ignoring you again. Your nastiness has already come out on this thread, and I want nothing to do with it. And you show profound ignorance of dispensationalism when you link it falsely to Roman Catholicism.

 

Peter says it is in heaven today if you study his sermon in Act 2. Plus this detail from among many.

“And when thy days [David] be fulfilled, and thou shalt sleep with thy fathers, I will set up thy seed after thee, which shall proceed out of thy bowels, and I will establish his kingdom. He shall build an house for my name, and I will stablish the throne of his kingdom for ever.” 2 Samuel 7:12–13 (KJV 1900)

 

We are Israel, so any prophecy you think pertains to the former Jews, pertains to us.

 

Please ignore me unless you are willing to have your views challenged.

 

Here's how it works. God removed the unbelieving Jews from Isreal leaving the believers. He then grafted believing gentiles into their place, namely Us. So we are Israel and the unbelievers are not. They are gentiles under God's wrath until the end of the world. But many convert to Christ and rejoin Israel, i.e. the Church.

 

To anyone tempted to believe the canard that dispensationalism was invented by Roman Catholics (not that that would make it false, logically speaking), I recommend Ancient Dispensational Truth: Refuting the Myth that Dispensationalism is New, by James C. Morris (2018).

 

Spot on! And we are the circumcision ...

2 Beware of the dogs, beware of the evil workers, beware of the concision:
3 for we are the circumcision, who worship by the Spirit of God, and glory in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh: Phil 3

 

There was no Millennium between the Cross and now. That is what Jesus taught. In fact it has been 1991 years.

That is why preaching the coming Millennium exist now since the Cross is wrong.

 

I thought the Jesuits invoked pre-mill? The Pharisees taught what Amil teach if they were pre-mill. Jesus did come before such a time period that both amill and Pharisees teach. The issue with the Pharisees is that they totally rejected the first coming and still thought the kingdom started in the first century like amil teach.

BTW, Paul was a Pharisee. So you must be right that Paul teaches in all His writings Premillennialism. Amil should not use any of Paul's writings to point out Amil. That would be hypocritical.

To Paul as a Christian Pharisee, the Second Coming starts the Millennium. To the rest of the first century Pharisees, the Second Coming is still the first coming to them, in theory. The Millennium will happen at that point, regardless of the first century Pharisees' ability to see that there would be two comings of Jesus.

The first century Pharisees were amil in practice, if they were pre-mill in thought. They were amil in timing, since they rejected Jesus. Today's amil just reject the timing, and claim the first coming proves there is no future kingdom after the Second Coming.

Today's amil should not shift their error onto the Pharisees to prove a point. They only had the OT writings to go by. Amil should know better because they have the whole Word of God.

 

The Jesuits laid the groundwork for Dispensationalism. Do your homework.

 

This is not true. You have it exactly backward. Do your homework.

 

Hint: There is no millennium. It is a false Pharisee Doctrine. A-Mill = No Millennium.