Then you are taking the position that when Paul writes:TCGreek said:1. My choice is "made alive" is a reference to a mortal body that will become immortal.
For since death came through a man, the resurrection of the dead comes also through a man.For as in Adam all die, so in Christ all will be made alive.But each in his own turn: Christ, the firstfruits; then, when he comes, those who belong to him. Then the end will come, when he hands over the kingdom to God the Father after he has destroyed all dominion, authority and power.
he is talking about bodies and not even addressing the issue of the real "place" where our existence, on your view anyway, really lies - namely the "soul" or "spirit" that is already in Heaven. Of course, this is not a "plain reading" at all - it requires us to accept the "insertion" of an "I am only talking about bodies here" qualifier. In fact it also requires us to see this text (from the end of the chapter):
"Where, O death, is your sting?" The sting of death is sin, and the power of sin is the law. But thanks be to God! He gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ"
as a declaration of what must be a very limited victory - the great victory, on your view anyway, seems to be God's ability to give you an immortal body. Let's be clear here - you are saying that the "being made alive" stuff at Christ's return is about bodies - the soul is already securely in Heaven enjoying full experience of fellowship with God and other saints.
I would have thought that the great victory would be Christ's victory over the death of that entity which carries the essence of who we are - a disembodied soul / spirit (on your view, anyway). The real victory is that we get conscious existence in fellowship with God in Heaven - not to merely wrap that disembodied soul in a body.
Then it would seem that Lazarus has already attained what any reasonable person would see as the real victory - the "swallowing up of death in victory. The problem is that Paul sees this as a future event:TCGreek said:3. Per Luke 16:19 both the rich and Lazarus were fully conscious after death, though this scene is before the cross and the resurrection.
I declare to you, brothers, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God, nor does the perishable inherit the imperishable. Listen, I tell you a mystery: We will not all sleep, but we will all be changed— in a flash, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, the dead will be raised imperishable, and we will be changed. 53For the perishable must clothe itself with the imperishable, and the mortal with immortality. When the perishable has been clothed with the imperishable, and the mortal with immortality, then the saying that is written will come true: "Death has been swallowed up in victory."
I believe that the Luke 16 account is a parable where Jesus is critiquing the nation of Israel for its failure to fulfill its destiny to be God's people for the world. It is no co-incidence that the rich man has five brothers. I believe Jesus is implicitly referring to the five brothers of Judah as per Genesis 35:23:
The sons of Leah:
Reuben the firstborn of Jacob,
Simeon, Levi, Judah, Issachar and Zebulun
I will make a claim that I will not defend in this post but which I believe is indeed defensible: there is a Biblical precedent of Judah as being used to represent Israel as a whole. The use of one person to represent his people is a thoroughly Biblical concept - I claim that Jesus "became the nation of Israel" in a sense I will not get into here.
I think the Luke 16 account has nothing to do with the state of affairs in the human afterlife but is rather Jesus' way of telling the nation of Israel that a new covenant family is about to created - and not one that is based on Jewish ethnicity.