Having said that I will also remind everyone that on more than one occasion I have said that every eschatological scenario has difficulties which threaten its credulity.
I agree. While I have come to the conclusion that the truth is on the preterist side, I'm not married to any particular view within preterism.
Personally, IMO full preterism offers the most difficulties of this kind.
Partial preterism (generally speaking) is far more credulous.
I find just the opposite, futurism is the weakest of all.
It seems to me that Isaiah 65-66 and related time line events are more in harmony with the millennium than the 2 Peter passage wherein is the difficulty.
Bingo! *Isaiah 65-66 cannot be harmonized with 2Peter 3 in a futuristic paradigm.
The 2 Peter passages IMO come at the end of the millennium, Isaiah 65-66 deals with the millennium itself at the end of which will come the final cleansing of evil and the final disposition of the evil one.
And this is the problem, futurism teaches 2 Peter 3 is the Second Coming, not the end of the Millennium.
This goes on into is the “eternal state” in which we all believe and for that which we look forward to in anticipation which is the ultimate "new heavens" and "new earth"
"Ultimate"? Are there more than one New Heavens and New Earth?
When Isaiah speaks of the “new heavens” and “new earth” I believe it points to the absolute end of all evil and evil personages, a renovation of matter, redemption of those of the second birth all of which is the ultimate end of the savior of the world - Jesus Christ.
But Isaiah speaks of curses and death existing in the New H&E.
Then comes the eternal state:
Revelation 21:1 And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea.
2 And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.
3 And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God.
4 And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.
5 And he that sat upon the throne said, Behold, I make all things new. And he said unto me, Write: for these words are true and faithful.
Doesn't sound like what Isaiah spoke of under a futurist interpretation.
Still, I understand that this interpretation has difficulties.
Your an honest man HankD. For me futurism collapses when you try to reconcile Is. 65-66 with 2Peter 3 and Rev.21.*
However, far less IMO than the full preterism theory which says that both Isaiah 65-66 and 2 Peter have both been fulfilled in the past.
Again, it not just full preterist, John Owen, John Lightfoot along with modern partial preterist:
http://americanvision.org/5523/the-promise-of-his-appearing-2-peter-3/#sthash.eVCQjk8C.dpbs*