BobRyan
Well-Known Member
There were four other major earthquakes in that area in the three years preceding her idiotic prediction.
Another earthquake happened four year later.
!
Oddly enough your little list of 4 earthquakes -- and all since that time - do not measure up to the 1906 event predicted in 1902.
Hint: This quote below is stating a fact of history - sadly enough for your story.
The San Francisco earthquake of 1906 was a major earthquake that struck San Francisco and the coast of Northern California at 5:12 a.m. on Wednesday, April 18, 1906.[3] Devastating fires broke out in the city and lasted for several days. As a result of the quake and fires, about 3,000 people died[4] and over 80% of San Francisco was destroyed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1906_Sa...sco_earthquake
The earthquake and resulting fire are remembered as one of the worst natural disasters in the history of the United States[5] alongside the Galveston Hurricane of 1900 and Hurricane Katrina in 2005.[6] The death toll from the earthquake and resulting fire is the greatest loss of life from a natural disaster in California's history.
That historic fact does not vanish simply because you find the details "inconvenient" - as anyone can see by now.
Your response is desperate to not let the facts get in the way of your little story.
And I am not trying to stop you from choosing that solution.
in Christ,
Bob