Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Why must everything be Calvinism vs. Arminianism? sighCalvinism or Arminianism?
Why must everything be Calvinism vs. Arminianism? sigh
Anyone who gets a bible, reads it many times over with a sincere heart, and then studies Protestant movements since Luther, is going to be different.What else is there to argue about - you know that when there are 8 Baptists in a room - there must be 10 different opinions!
Anyone who gets a bible, reads it many times over with a sincere heart, and then studies Protestant movements since Luther, is going to be different.
Be not forgetful to entertain strangers: for thereby some have entertained angels unawares. - Hebrews 13:2
Unto whom it was revealed, that not unto themselves, but unto us they did minister the things, which are now reported unto you by them that have preached the gospel unto you with the Holy Ghost sent down from heaven; which things the angels desire to look into. - 1 Peter 1:12
I believe it is entertaining to find what people do with the Word of God... Especially when they do so under the unction of the Holy Spirit!
I wish I could say I was sinless!Unlike you we don't fool our selves into think we are sinless. Nor are we so insecure to think we will loose our Salvation if we sin.
MB
I was trying to expand that out to include me as well.Rocky and MB - do I really need to mention that I was being a bit facetious?
Sadly, I look at it as factual.Rocky and MB - do I really need to mention that I was being a bit facetious?
Rocky and MB - do I really need to mention that I was being a bit facetious?
Sadly, I look at it as factual.
That's why I agreed with you...
Because I know of no three Baptists who can agree on anything, with any consistency.
Did you read all of this passage?Let the prophets speak two or three, and let the other judge.. - 1 Corinthians 14:29
Judgement... There is provision in scripture to judge the interpretations. If everyone was right all the time there would be no need for this provision!
How would one know if there would be an interpreter unless he first speaks in tongues? If he gives a message in tongues and there is no interpretation then it time for the service to move on. As the Apostle also went on to say....Did you read all of this passage?
" How is it then, brethren? when ye come together, every one of you hath a psalm, hath a doctrine, hath a tongue, hath a revelation, hath an interpretation. Let all things be done unto edifying.
27 If any man speak in an [unknown] tongue, [let it be] by two, or at the most [by] three, and [that] by course; and let one interpret.
28 But if there be no interpreter, let him keep silence in the church; and let him speak to himself, and to God.
29 Let the prophets speak two or three, and let the other judge.
30 If [any thing] be revealed to another that sitteth by, let the first hold his peace.
31 For ye may all prophesy one by one, that all may learn, and all may be comforted.
32 And the spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets.
33 For God is not [the author] of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints." ( 1 Corinthians 14:26-33 ).
It's not about doctrines, it's about speaking in tongues and about prophesying, is it not?
My point is, that it seems to me that you've quoted 1 Corinthians 14:29 for support that differing doctrines are based on interpretation.How would one know if there would be an interpreter unless he first speaks in tongues? If he gives a message in tongues and there is no interpretation then it time for the service to move on. As the Apostle also went on to say....
Paul had the order of service in mind. In which our services are dominated with a preacher delivering a well prepared sermon. If we don't agree with him a visit to the parsonage or a board meeting would be the place to discuss it.The order we like to see our services...My point is, that it seems to me that you've quoted 1 Corinthians 14:29 for support that differing doctrines are based on interpretation.
But the verse, as you've used it, is not speaking about doctrinal "interpretation", it is speaking with reference to language ( tongues ) interpretation and the interpretation of prophecies.
Wouldn't you agree?
I take it you did not agree.Paul had the order of service in mind. In which our services are dominated with a preacher delivering a well prepared sermon. If we don't agree with him a visit to the parsonage or a board meeting would be the place to discuss it.The order we like to see our services...
1. Prayer
2. Song
3. Offering
4. Invitation for special prayer - Elders assisting and w/anointing oil
5. Song
6. Sermon
7. Altar-call - Sometimes church goes up front to kneel and pray
I don't mind speaking in tongues as long as it's in order, decent, of the Spirit, and the service moves on .I take it you did not agree.
There have been interpretations of tongues, but that has to be something of the Holy Spirit. If someone attempts to interpret and it is something that begins something like, "I feel the Spirit is saying..." Well that is as bad as the "babababa" as it is something obviously of the flesh.I take it you did not agree.