KenH
Well-Known Member
Anyway, thanks for insulting my intelligence and due diligence in research.
I apologize.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Anyway, thanks for insulting my intelligence and due diligence in research.
I gave you my opinion and quite well researched explanation...Sounds like you jump to a lot of conclusions in your own mind without much to back them up except your own reasoning. Anyway, thanks for replying.
But don't you DARE say, I jumped to any conclusions...
Fair enough...Again, I apologize.
Hoping to hear you slay that Greensleeves come Christmas!
He was not like a Jew. He was a Jew and still is. What color were Jews? The most racially pure ones alive today are white with black hair. You dont have to be white as a sheet of paper to be white.Well, because, he was like, a Jew, and whatnot.
I just thought it would be fun to talk like a Valley-girl (I'm a gen-x-er).....what with all the commas and what-not. But, thanksHe was not like a Jew. He was a Jew and still is. Whatccolor were Jews? The most racially pure ones alive today are white with black hair. You dont have to be white as a sheet of paper to be white.
How do we know He was not White?
No one knows what color Palestinians were at that time.It's simple. His ancestors were not Anglo-Saxon - not European. Those people came from Germany, et. al. to Britain.
I also do not believe Jesus had blue eyes, long curly beautiful hair - light brown with golden highlights, a handsome face [albeit, a little weak-chinned and effeminate]. In other words, Jesus looked nothing like Jim C.'s protrayal in the Passion of the Christ. or most pictures that hung in our grandmothers' ktichens.
The Bible says - in two different genealogies - that his ancestry was of Middle Eastern descent. His lineage is of the area that we would call today - Palestinian
The Bible also says he was not much to look at. That's let's out the handsome Jesus that most movies portray him as.
If by that you mean Anglo-Saxon in genetic makeup, that is true, he was closer to being a Semitic Jew.
Of course he did, he was her son. To deny that is to deny his real humanity which renders you a docetist.
Thus, Jesus was not a man, and not a human.
Docetic heresy.
How would that follow? What evidence that he was Black African as opposed to Semitic?....parentage?
You've already denied parentage, so that's out the window..
Maybe he followed a purely Anglo-Saxon gene code then,
or a Far-eastern one?
Maybe he looked like the Eskimos?
If we can simply deny Jesus' real maternity and humanity, we can make him look however we want right?
Given your proposals, it's perfectly reasonable to suggest that he had blonde hair, blue eyes, and ruddy Anglo-Saxon features...….
Or...
Maybe he looked a lot like Kim Jong Un.
Since he wasn't a real human with any genetics whatsoever....
Maybe he was green.
Yeah, but there's genetic limits to what they could imagine (at least) which seem to have been dispensed with by you so maybe he had six arms in your mind?
I'll take "artists renditions" any day over heresy.
did not have corruption from either Mary or Joseph
What an odd conspiracy theory.Bathsheba isn't a woman's real name.
Any Theologian with real knowledge of Hebrew knows that. Her "name" is "woman of sheba"...or "daughter of Sheba"
"Bathsheba" is not her name.
The writer of the book didn't use her proper name....
On purpose.
Bathsheba is not a hero of that story line
She is the unnamed gentile bride of an honorable gentile (who has a name) Urriah the Hittite. Who wittingly seduced David. David was of course equally at fault for his sins....
But there's a reason Urriah didn't go home and sleep with his wife when David wanted him to.
He knew what was going on, and he wasn't stupid.
He wouldn't give David the cover he needed.
That's why he was killed.
He was killed because he wouldn't cover for David and his unnamed whore of a wife when they needed him to provide plausible deniability.
Urriah (who has a real name unlike his wife) didn't play ball, so he died,
That's the story.
No, she isn't noble, or rich, and she works outside and therefore has potentially semi-calloused hands and a tan from hard work.
Maybe she incidentally is, in fact black, but, that's not what she is saying when she says "I am black but comely"...
that meant, she isn't fair and un-touched by the Sun and hard work.
Any real Theologian with knowledge of Hebrew knows that too.
She is the unnamed gentile bride of an honorable gentile (who has a name) Urriah the Hittite. Who wittingly seduced David. David was of course equally at fault for his sins....
But there's a reason Urriah didn't go home and sleep with his wife when David wanted him to.
He knew what was going on, and he wasn't stupid.
He wouldn't give David the cover he needed.
That's why he was killed.
He was killed because he wouldn't cover for David and his unnamed whore of a wife when they needed him to provide plausible deniability.
Urriah (who has a real name unlike his wife) didn't play ball, so he died,
That's the story..
Mary was just as corrupt in sin as Joseph. It's hogwash to say the sin nature comes only through men. Our sin nature comes from the curse. Jesus was made flesh without the curse of sin laid upon him. There was nothing from either Mary or Joseph.Doesn't our sin nature come from Adam? If so, then Jesus getting his humanity from Mary would not have corrupted Him.
No one knows what color Palestinians were at that time.
Mary was just as corrupt in sin as Joseph.
Jesus wasn't white. If he had any genetic features from Mary, and I contend he didn't have either Mary or Joseph's genetic markers, then Jesus clearly had a black African gene code.
The artists rendering of Jesus are purely their cultural imagination.
Mary was just as corrupt in sin as Joseph. It's hogwash to say the sin nature comes only through men. Our sin nature comes from the curse. Jesus was made flesh without the curse of sin laid upon him. There was nothing from either Mary or Joseph.
It is probably only human to try and visualize how Jesus may have appeared. He most likely doesn't care how we visualize Him (even though liberal activists do) but cares more importantly about the spiritual aspects.
If Jesus had wanted us to know what He looked like, there would be no doubt about what He looked like, because New Testament scripture would have given detailed descriptions of His appearance. Also, there were sculptors in that day, and there could likely have been a sculptor or two in the crowds of people who gathered to hear Him preach. A message could have gone out prior to a sermon, "If there are any artists or sculptors in the crowd, the Master would like to meet with you following today's sermon. He may have some work for you."