I stand by EVERY word I said.
This may be true, but that is not the point: the point is that the words you say contradict each other.
You still are missing the fact that you say here...
↑
Jesus sanctified himself through continuous obedience to the father's will ending I his death at Calvary (Philippians 2:8).
Click to expand...
...That Christ sanctified Himself through obedience, which the ultimate obedience of Christ was to the Cross.
Don't you see you are saying two different things?
The above agrees with what I have been trying to show you.
lol
Now,
Could you please walk me proof of Jesus being sanctified by the Blood of the covenant, and the purpose of such if at all.
Well, if you were familiar with the verse in question you might notice what it actually states:
Hebrews 10:29
King James Version (KJV)
29 Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
The Death of Christ is that which sets Christ apart, and this is in relation to the New Covenant.
Christ speaks of sanctifying Himself here:
John 17:19
King James Version (KJV)
19 And for their sakes I sanctify myself, that they also might be sanctified through the truth.
Keep in mind that this is spoken right before He is taken (in the Garden of Gethsemane). Now what is he referring to. What event takes place after this that most are aware of?
Look at it again:
Hebrews 10:29
King James Version (KJV)
29 Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
You are viewing sanctification as though it is a removal of sin. That's not it. It is a making holy, or attributing something to be holy, and can be used in both a positional as well as progressive application.
In view here are those who, rather than embracing His Sacrifice which is the very basis for the New Covenant, consider it to be the exact opposite...unholy. "Wherewith He was sanctified" is tied to Christ.
Here are a few verses to consider that present this same application:
1 Timothy 4
King James Version (KJV)
4 For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving:
5 For it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer.
What does Paul mean that a creature (animal) received with thanksgiving is sanctified? Does He mean that it has been purged of sin? No. It means it has been set apart unto God.
John 10:36
King James Version (KJV)
36 Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son of God?
What does he mean that Christ was sanctified of God and sent into the world?
1 Peter 3:15
King James Version (KJV)
15 But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear:
If God can be sanctified, are you so amazed that Christ can be?
Especially when the context is dealing directly in a contrast between two Covenants?
Again, those who rejected the Covenant of Law (Moses Law) and those rejecting the New Covenant are contrasted.
And again, when believers are sanctified by the Blood of Christ, Hebrews 10:14 makes it clear that the promise of the New Covenant has been bestowed, because they have been made perfect...complete...in regards to remission of sins.
What that means, Vooks, is that there is no more need for forgiveness regarding the penalty of sin.
The song is true: Jesus paid it all, all to Him I owe.
You create a conflict when you say that those who reject the New Covenant are sanctified by the Blood of Christ. You pit Scripture against Scripture, making it to, like you, say two different things which are not possibly both true.
Don't mention it.
PS
Try and pretend to back your answer with scriptures......PRETEND
@Darrell C, you can hack it
Speaking of hacks...
Now, can you see your problem?
This...
↑
Jesus sanctified himself through continuous obedience to the father's will ending I his death at Calvary (Philippians 2:8).
Click to expand...
...and this...
If your conscience and revelation can live with an UNSANCTIFIED Jesus who desperately needed his own blood to wash him,
Are taking two different sides of the fence.
You assume I am saying that Christ needed to benefit from the Cross like a sinner because you simply do not understand sanctification and you will not take the time to listen to someone trying to help you understand.
Christ was sanctified, and in more than one way.
God bless.