-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Why are so many post "KJVO"?
- Thread starter JeaniMarie
- Start date
Ed Edwards
<img src=/Ed.gif>
Item changed for the better, maybe?
Language Dude Test, Question One.
Which is right?
1. Their there own worst enemy they're.
2. They're their own worst enemy there.
3. There they're own worst enemy their.
Language Dude Test, Question One.
Which is right?
1. Their there own worst enemy they're.
2. They're their own worst enemy there.
3. There they're own worst enemy their.
Argh! I missed that!
NOW it's #2. Send the prize check to Amy!
Ed Edwards
<img src=/Ed.gif>
Shows how bad we need Super Grammar Dude (or Dudette) (SGD).
SGD, come and help us, we kneed you!
SGD, come and help us, we kneed you!
Ed Edwards
<img src=/Ed.gif>
We Have a Winner!
Amy.G wins the Kewpie® Doll!"
Congratulations! :thumbs:
Let's hear it for Amy.G!"
Signed, Language Cop
"Cor-rect! :thumbsup:
Amy.G wins the Kewpie® Doll!"
Congratulations! :thumbs:
Let's hear it for Amy.G!"
Signed, Language Cop
Last edited by a moderator:
EdEdwards said:
"I now yield the mike to our next presenter!" (Language Cop)Ed Edwards said:
:applause:
"Uh- thank-a! Thank-a vury muuuch!
Uh- can we, uh can we also hear it for Ed Edwards and Mexdeaf?
A-gin, thank-a! Thank-a vury muuuch!" (The 'King')
:laugh:
Last edited by a moderator:
Just thought I would edit your post since your wife wasn't able to.:laugh:
Harold and Ed,
May I please make an extremely simple and usually over-looked statement? Christ said that we would be known by our love for one another. I have no degrees, very little higher education, and could not possibly begin to keep pace with either of you when it comes to grammatical accuracy and proper phrasing. We must remember that we are not our own. We may correct each other in love all day and it must be done in that manner. I do tire of defending my faith against KJVO's in my family. Do I condemn them for being KJVO? Certainly not. Why should it be then that I am condemned? Is it a matter of being uneducated on the background and history of translations? Is it a conviction that is deeply rooted as one works out their own salvation with fear and trembling? Perhaps it is merely the act of taking up a contrary position to defend one's tradition. I'm quite sure it's different with each individual. No matter. We are required by 1 Peter 3:15 to always be ready to give an answer for the hope that is in us with meekness and fear (KJV), or gentlness and respect, if you will. If we can't do this with each other, how can we do this with the world? I mean no disrespect to either of you. I love you both and respect you're opinions on the topics discussed. It is my hope that we may all remember that among the fruits of the spirit, the greatest of these is love.
Peace to you both,
Rlee
Last edited by a moderator:
Unacceptable. No outside resources allowed. :laugh:
This is the funnest versions thread that I have seen so far. :laugh:
(Can anyone find the grammatical error in that sentence? I'll give you my kewpie dolls. :thumbsup
More of a spelling error, isn't it?
This is the funnIest versions thread that I have seen so far.
Nope. It's a grammatical error. But thanks for playing! :tongue3:
Last edited by a moderator:
"'Which' variant would you prefer that I should mention, for the first incidence?
Would it be the actual 'proper' grammatical error, the poor phrasing elsewhere, or the adjective in a subsequent sentence?
I do thank you for the offer of the dolls, however I shall pass your generous offer for 3 reasons similar to the ones below, along with a few others of like kind.
Incidentally, the pics, while not of our own cats, are very close in appearance to four of our own 'house' cats, the names (or nicknames) of which, respectively are 'Baby Boy', Shemp, 'Itch', and one who is very appropriately dubbed 'Monster'. 'Baby Boy' would actually carry off the dolls, and hide them, if he were able to get his mouth on them in a manner sufficient to carry them, provided that 'Monster' had not already knocked them off wherever they might have been situated, breaking them in the process, if they should happen to be the 'porcelain' type. If they were perchance the 'rubber' type, Shemp would likely chew a hole in them.
No doubt, you can now understand the reason(s) I must pass on your very generous offer."
Signed, Language Cop
Last edited by a moderator:
"Amy.G is entirely correct in that there was no spelling error in her post."
Signed, Language Cop