Both enabled to us by the Holy Spirit, not produced in and by ourselves!In Acts 20 does the text not say, "repentance toward God and faith in our Lord Jesus Christ"?
rd
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Both enabled to us by the Holy Spirit, not produced in and by ourselves!In Acts 20 does the text not say, "repentance toward God and faith in our Lord Jesus Christ"?
rd
Both enabled to us by the Holy Spirit, not produced in and by ourselves!
Both enabled to us by the Holy Spirit, not produced in and by ourselves!
Unless God regenerates us (TULEP) we cannot repent or have faith!!In Acts 20 does the text not say, "repentance toward God and faith in our Lord Jesus Christ"?rd
So you have to be baptized every time you sin?Your not regenerated if you still have sins to be washed away.
So you have to be baptized every time you sin?
But the verse you quoted as proof says "Rise and be baptized, and wash away your sins."You are only born again once.
But the verse you quoted as proof says "Rise and be baptized, and wash away your sins."
So, according to that, every time you sin you should be baptized to wash away that sin.
Yes, during the washing away of sins by baptism.The point I'm trying to make is there is a regeneration and renewing occurring during that washing away of sins.
Rev, I purposely came to this forum with the very same question!I am still trying to figure out who it is that hates God's sovereignty in election. Unless some specific people can be named we can know the title of the op to be a Calvinist lie.
Rev, I purposely had the very same question!
After 7 pages who in particular here (or name an author from anywhere) who in fact hate the sovereignty of God?
HankD
So, according to you nobody anywhere on earth hates the sovereignty of God in election? How do you know that?No one.
It is a question. "Why Do Men Hate God's Sovereignty in Election?"It is a flat out lie.
So what bothers you is not the question but that the question was asked by a Calvinist?It needs to be dealt with but since a cagey calvinist posted it it will likely not be dealt with.
If you have a problem with a post report it. But complaining about it in the open forum while refusing to report it seems rather more like a childish tantrum than a legitimate concern.These days misrepresentaitons of positions of those who are not calvinists to white bashing is seemingly allowed on this board.
Sinners will never ask for Grace of God apart from the Holy Spirit working on them!Jesus says YOU ARE THE LIGHT OF THE WORLD.
Luke 11
13“If you then, being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to those who ask Him?”
ANSWER CHRIST^^^^^
JUST how much more?
Calvinist says "NEVER and NONE AT ALL"
What happens when a reprobate asks for God's help?
And the sad part is this Pharisaical ELITE who CAN ASK on behalf of the reprobates ONLY CARE ABOUT THEMSELVES, They tie up the burdens on reprobates and don't even lift a finger for them.
Rev, I purposely came to this forum with the very same question!
After 7 pages who in particular here (or name an author from anywhere) who in fact hate the sovereignty of God?
HankD
I did read the O/P. I re-read it. You used the generic term "men" as a set of haters of God's sovereignty.You either didn't read the OP, or you are having a problem understanding it. I can help with the latter.
I did read the O/P. I re-read it. You used the generic term "men" as a set of haters of God's sovereignty.
Why Do Men Hate God's Sovereignty in Election
I repeat who in particular of this set of sovereignty haters of God in election can you ID of whom we would know because using the generic term "men" seems to indicate that all men hate the sovereignty of God.
I am of this set "men". I am also elect, however I do not hate the sovereignty of God which is causing my inquiry.
Without the particular ID of an element of the generic set of men (or perhaps there is a subset within the set of "men") it would seem to mean your proposition is ill defined.
Indeed I am having a problem understanding the O/P but as I indicated above it seems justified.
Please advise.
Thanks
HankD
Rev, I purposely came to this forum with the very same question!
After 7 pages who in particular here (or name an author from anywhere) who in fact hate the sovereignty of God?