Show me the documents from the period to show that then
[ April 18, 2006, 01:21 PM: Message edited by: Matt Black ]
[ April 18, 2006, 01:21 PM: Message edited by: Matt Black ]
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Are you implying that there were no other Christians in the world between 313 and 1160? If so, you are the perfect product of Roman Catholic revisionist history. You are living in absolute, and willful ignorance.Mike, it's very simple - please answer this question, which requires a yes or a no answer: do you have any documentation dating from the period 313-1160 which demonstrates that there were Christian or evangelical groups outside of the Catholic and Orthodox Churches, yes or no?
And Kamoroso said..."Mike, it's very simple - please answer this question, which requires a yes or a no answer: do you have any documentation dating from the period 313-1160 which demonstrates that there were Christian or evangelical groups outside of the Catholic and Orthodox Churches, yes or no?"
I agree. It sure is looking like they have Matt "hook line and sinker", as they say.Are you implying that there were no other Christians in the world between 313 and 1160? If so, you are the perfect product of Roman Catholic revisionist history. You are living in absolute, and willful ignorance.
I learn from you more. BTW, Pilgrim Church in English is quite worthwhile to buy. It is really a good book.Originally posted by D28guy:
Eliyahu,
Good link there.Lots of interesting reading in it. Much truth. Praise God for His loyal witnesses all through the ages.![]()
Thanks![]()
Mike
You must be relying on a certain history now, to refuse the other history. Does it have all the proofs which you can verify?Originally posted by Matt Black:
Checked it out. Written 1918 ie: not in the years 313-1160, so doesn't qualify.
That period was dominated by RCC, and if any scholar published any book, then RCC eradicated them as they did with Heugnots in later time too.Originally posted by Matt Black:
At least the Scriptures are documents! All I'm asking for is some documents dating from 313-1160 which support the thesis being advanced. Is that so difficult?
I followed the link - no mention of sources apart from someone called Kattenbusch whom I presume post-dates the period with which we are concerned.Originally posted by Eliyahu:
Matt,
For example, I post here the link for 300-850 AD period and it mentions about the sources. If you have any objection to it, you can present the opposite argument.
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/thailand/PC-B-034.HTM
Otherwise, if you just refuse the history without any reasoning, then you are confessing that you are biased with pre-conception already.
That period was dominated by RCC, and if any scholar published any book, then RCC eradicated them as they did with Heugnots in later time too.Originally posted by Eliyahu:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Matt Black:
At least the Scriptures are documents! All I'm asking for is some documents dating from 313-1160 which support the thesis being advanced. Is that so difficult?
Hussites, Waldenses, Lollards are difficult for Catholic to deny, because they showed their faith quite well and they left the records quite a lot.Originally posted by Matt Black:My question to you is this: if the Catholics are guilty of misrepresenting the truth re the Cathar-Albigenses as you allege, how come they've told the truth about the other three medieval groups? [/QB]