"Why do you KJV only people attack the word of God?"

[saturneptune]

Hi Ed. Yes, I like to share the wealth and get others thinking about this most vital issue. I have the time right now during school break to do what I most love - talking about and defending God's pure words.

As for new, I just wrote the article this morning and used some of my previous quotes about how so many present day evangelicals are openly admitting what we know most of you here really believe anyway.

And yes, it is on my website.

Will K

You need a hobby, or another hobby. You are obsessed with this subject, on top of being proven wrong again and again.

 

[Samuel Owen]

You need a hobby, or another hobby. You are obsessed with this subject, on top of being proven wrong again and again.

I really haven't seen that done yet.

 

[Harold Garvey]

Man, give it a rest! This tune is starting to get a bit old.

Will makes valid points and this is your best answer?

I can be 'preached at' on Sunday, when I am in the services. Incidentally, I can also assure you that the pastor will be using only the KJV, and I will either be carrying my own KJV or my NKJV, and my bride will also have her KJV along (plus all the other unknown number of versions that are on her 'electronic' phone Bible, as well).

Whoopee! But why not follow your pastor's lead?

You have consistently refused to answer legit questions posed by other respondents. In addition, you are showing no regard for BB rules, IMO, including attacking other posters and making false allegations.

Um, you just did what you accused him of doing.

And you wonder why you have managed to get banned, elsewhere.

Here's a 'news flash" from one who has absolutely no authority on the BB.

Keep it up, and you will likely be soon able to add the Baptist Board to the tune,

"Strike up the

"

Ed

And this is to be considered advice when the world is banning the Bible and trying to get Christians fined and incarcerated for even carrying a Bible.

you mentioned your pastor's use of the KJV, ever consider WHY he uses it ? maybe you should ask him.

 

[Harold Garvey]

The sooner the better!!!!!

I would think this attitude requires an apology, but that's just the Christ in me.

 

[Harold Garvey]

I personally have seen NOTHING that Will has posted that even comes close to what you are accusing him of. This board is notorious for "banning" (which is another word for censorship, IMHO) and "locking" threads. Let him post,.................. just because the "good ole boys" in here disagree with him, doesn't mean Will should not be heard.

true and just! But then that is the way to censor what others know to be true and keep one's little playhouse intact.

I was being "told on" for bringing to the attention some pretty vile attitudes towards other members and certainly they wanted me banned! they even told me i was not :wanted" and should just leave. Now isn't that nice!:love2:

And people wonder why most people want nothing to do with christians or the church!

 

[Mexdeaf]

true and just! But then that is the way to censor what others know to be true and keep one's little playhouse intact.

I was being "told on" for bringing to the attention some pretty vile attitudes towards other members and certainly they wanted me banned! they even told me i was not :wanted" and should just leave. Now isn't that nice!:love2:

And people wonder why most people want nothing to do with christians or the church!

This isn't church.

I see pretty vile attitudes on both sides. But Will calling people "Bible agnostics" as he has is definitely against the BB rules.

 

[saturneptune]

I really haven't seen that done yet.

All it takes is thought.

 

[saturneptune]

true and just! But then that is the way to censor what others know to be true and keep one's little playhouse intact.

I was being "told on" for bringing to the attention some pretty vile attitudes towards other members and certainly they wanted me banned! they even told me i was not :wanted" and should just leave. Now isn't that nice!:love2:

And people wonder why most people want nothing to do with christians or the church!

You have no right to talk about anyone not having a civil attitude, or someone else being responsible for people not wanting anything to do with the church. Look at your posts since you registered, then look in the mirror.

 

[Baptist4life]

You have no right to talk about anyone not having a civil attitude, or someone else being responsible for people not wanting anything to do with the church. Look at your posts since you registered, then look in the mirror.

Hmmmm. "....................cast out first the beam out of thine own eye.............."

 

[saturneptune]

Hmmmm. "Remove the beam in your own.............."

Don't believe I asked for your opinion.

 

[tinytim]

How is Will posting again since he was banned a few yrs ago under Brandplucked?

 

[saturneptune]

I personally have seen NOTHING that Will has posted that even comes close to what you are accusing him of. This board is notorious for "banning" (which is another word for censorship, IMHO) and "locking" threads. Let him post,.................. just because the "good ole boys" in here disagree with him, doesn't mean Will should not be heard.

You are totally off base with that comment. First of all, the board as you put it is very tolerant of posts and threads. If you see nothing that Will has posted to offend several other posters, I believe it is you that needs to get the plank out of your eye. I am certainly not a "good ole boy" for this forum. The point is your post has no foundation of truth.

 

[Baptist4life]

Don't believe I asked for your opinion.

.......and........gosh....I can't find where someone asked for yours anywhere either. :tongue3:

 

[saturneptune]

If you want the opinion of an innocent bystander, ----- there are some nasty people on this forum. But I guess, you didn't ask for my opinion either.

In fact! I have found none nastier; anywhere on the web.

There are no boards, beams, or planks in anyone's eye here, just plain old LOGS.

It is good that you think so highly of yourself that you know what is in each person's eye. Oh, and by the way, since you are so concerened about following rules, I was just wondering why you are posting in a Baptist only forum and list yourself as non-denominational?

 

[Tom Bryant]

I fully agree with the Baptist Faith and Message's way of saying it:

Quote:
The Holy Bible was written by men divinely inspired and is God's revelation of Himself to man. It is a perfect treasure of divine instruction. It has God for its author, salvation for its end, and truth, without any mixture of error, for its matter. Therefore, all Scripture is totally true and trustworthy.

This "confession of faith" is faulty and very poorly thought out from the get go. For one thing, "The Holy Bible" is never identified. WHICH bible? There are hundreds of them and they sure do not agree with each other.

Another thing, it sounds like this confession is referring to the individual books that later on became "the Bible". The Bible is composed of 66 smaller books, and those original writing never did make up a Bible. And where in any number of these modern versions do we have truth without any mixture of error?

Most of the guys on this forum have already told us that either the KJB or even all the bible versions have errors in them. So are you guys eliminating the King James Bible from the list of possible candidates of "the Bible" which is never identified in that very poorly thought out confession?

Will K

So you "fully agree" except where you disagree... makes perfect sense. Either you fully agree or you don't... guess logic escapes you here also.

 

[Will J. Kinney]

"Bible agnostics" is a true description

This isn't church.

I see pretty vile attitudes on both sides. But Will calling people "Bible agnostics" as he has is definitely against the BB rules.

Hi Mexdeaf. When I refer to a person being a "Bible agnostic" I simply mean they do not know what the complete, inspired and 100% true Bible is, or where to find it. Anyone who holds to the "originals onlyist" view clearly does not have an inspired and infallible Bible now.

The term has nothing to do with whether or not you are a redeemed child of God.

If you don't like the fit description of being referred to as a Bible agnostic, then I hope God opens your spiritual eyes to see that the true "book of the LORD" is the Authorized King James Bible and then you can honestly call yourself a Bible believer. You would then believe every word of a real Bible (not just an imaginary one like those never seen by you "originals") and not change a thing. You would leave it alone just like God in His sovereignty gave it to us.

Blessings,

Will K

 

[Will J. Kinney]

brandplucked rides again

How is Will posting again since he was banned a few yrs ago under Brandplucked?

Hear, hear! Let's burn him at the stake!:tonofbricks:

Will Kinney

 

[Harold Garvey]

This isn't church.

I see pretty vile attitudes on both sides. But Will calling people "Bible agnostics" as he has is definitely against the BB rules.

I find it that maintaining the same character in church as well as out of church prevents hypocrisy.

I also find when one uses the "we're not in church" remark it indicates a level of rebellion.

I dont change my colors depending on the situation, it's calle making a stand.

 

[Samuel Owen]

[Non-Baptist posting in Baptist Only forum]

 

[saturneptune]

Ha Ha, I've been asked that one before. I am a Baptist, I just don't choose to identify with the Baptist organization any longer. So I registered as non-denominational. When the Baptists became Apostates, I got out of Dodge.

Oh, I get it. Not only are the people on this board nasty, you have moved beyond that to being better than some unnamed Baptist denominations. I am impressed, as you ascend quickly.