Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
God gave us common sense, a brain to use, technology that our brain has been able to develop over time. We ought to thank him for what he do have available to us, not complain for the unknown diseases that have come our way. And thank God, that he has enabled us to find cures for these various things. Just think, some years ago, the cure for epilepsy and some other diseases was drinking the urine of a cow. Aren't you glad that technology has increased to the point that we know a bit more than that, even though we don't know all that we should about epilepsy.Originally posted by Magnetic Poles:
Next, it'll be bird flu in chickens and mad cow disease in beef. What are we gonna eat?
MMMmmmmm!!! Donuts!
Don't remember the author, but an excellent book re: this is "NONE OF THESE DISEASES".Amazing that what science discovers today, the Bible taught 6000+ years ago!
Not necessarily. Mad cow disease and other prion diseases arise spontaneously in some animals or people due to a genetic mutation. The mutated prion is an abnormal protein that is resistant to breakdown. It has the ability to modify normal prions to the abnormal configuation. The prion can be spread to other animals or people by the consumption of tissue containing the prion, especially nerve or brain tissue. We made mad cow disease a problem by putting animal meal into cow feed. Theoretically a pig cannibalizing another could transmit a prion disease, but not likely as the spontaneous disease is rare.Originally posted by Ben W:
What I find interesting is that Pigs are actually Cannibals. If a pig dies in the sty and the others are hungry they will eat it, resultingly if you then eat the flesh of one of those pigs that has been into Cannibalism, you will get the pig version of mad cow disease and die.
In Christ,John Gill's Commentary on Gen 7 vs 1
Verse 2.
Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee by sevens,.... From hence it appears, that the distinction of clean and unclean beasts, at least for sacrifice, if not for food, was known before the flood, and so before the law of Moses; though some think this is said by anticipation, and as providing a large stock of such creatures for the propagation of their species; because they would be most serviceable to men both for food and sacrifice: but as it is certain that sacrifices were offered ever since the fall of man; by the same way, namely, by divine revelation, that men were taught to sacrifice creatures as typical of the sacrifice of Christ, they were directed what sort of creatures to offer, as were most suitable figures of him; those beasts that were clean, and used under the law, and so no doubt, at this time, were oxen, sheep, and goats: and these were to be taken into the ark by "sevens," or "seven seven" {p}; either only three pairs, male and female, for procreation, and the seventh a male for sacrifice, when the flood was over; or rather fourteen, seven couple, an equal number of male and female, as Aben Ezra and Ben Gersom, that there might be enough for propagation; since a large number of them would be consumed, both for food and sacrifice:
Since God is making the rules here – and God is the Creator of all flesh – mankind does well to listen to Christ the Creator in this regard.Leviticus 11
1 The LORD spoke again to Moses and to Aaron, saying to them,
2 ""Speak to the sons of Israel, saying, " These are the creatures which you may eat from all the animals that are on the earth.
Again not that you “must eat them” but you are allowed to eat them.3 "Whatever divides a hoof, thus making split hoofs, and chews the cud, among the animals, that you may eat.
...4 "Nevertheless, you are not to eat of these, among those which chew the cud, or among those which divide the hoof: the camel, for though it chews cud, it does not divide the hoof, it is unclean to you.
5 "Likewise, the shaphan, for though it chews cud, it does not divide the hoof, it is unclean to you;
6 the rabbit also, for though it chews cud, it does not divide the hoof, it is unclean to you;
7 and the pig, for though it divides the hoof, thus making a split hoof, it does not chew cud, it is unclean to you.
8 "You shall not eat of their flesh nor touch their carcasses; they are unclean to you.
God appeals to His own Lordship over mankind – His role as Creator and His right to call mankind to be “Holy” for “God IS Holy” rather than God’s people choosing to be “detestable”41 " Now every swarming thing that swarms on the earth is detestable, not to be eaten.
42 "Whatever crawls on its belly, and whatever walks on all fours, whatever has many feet, in respect to every swarming thing that swarms on the earth, you shall not eat them, for they are detestable.
43 " Do not render yourselves detestable through any of the swarming things that swarm; and you shall not make yourselves unclean with them so that you become unclean.
God calls upon His people to BE like God in walking in holiness. John says we are to WALK as Christ walked in 1John 2.44 "For I am the LORD your God. Consecrate yourselves therefore, and be holy, for I am holy. And you shall not make yourselves unclean with any of the swarming things that swarm on the earth.
45 " For I am the LORD who brought you up from the land of Egypt to be your God; thus you shall be holy, for I am holy.'''
Clearly then the rat, cat, dog and bat sandwich “is not to be eaten”, and mankind can freely read and know this.46 This is the law regarding the animal and the bird, and every living thing that moves in the waters and everything that swarms on the earth,
47 to make a distinction between the unclean and the clean, and between the edible creature and the creature which is not to be eaten.
That's not exactly cannibalism, it's scaverngerism. Many scavenger animals will eat their own kind if hungry enough.Originally posted by Ben W:
What I find interesting is that Pigs are actually Cannibals. If a pig dies in the sty and the others are hungry they will eat it...
The bottom line is "how many ways are there to ignore the Word of God?".Originally posted by hillclimber:
If you are going to keep that portion of the law, why not keep all of it? Whould you not be that much more spiritual, and healthy?
Then why aren't all of these other things, such as poison ivy and poison mushroom/toadstool, etc. ever called "unclean"? Because unclean is NOT about "health". It is about spiritual "DEFILEment"! You yourself said it: "No doubt this is because of their filthy life style." This had MORAL/spiritual significance, and note the behavioral characteristics of all the clean animals compared to the unclean(physically "filthy" or not. The hare has the same basic diet as the clean animals, but it was a pest to an agrarian society, and it's quick multiplying was associated with lasciviousness. And note, it is only animals; no plants.Remember, there was no modern medicine to stop the spread of disease in those days. Naturally then, God took every precaution for His people, to keep them healthy, and happy.
There are those who twist the scriptures to say that everything is clean to be eaten. This is nonsense. There are countless things in nature, that if eaten, will kill the ones who eat it. Either everything is clean, or some things aren’t, and some things are. You can’t have it both ways.
Because of this, I think we can eat as much pork and rabbit as we like. If it was good enough for Sam Gamgee, it's good enough for me!For it seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us to lay upon you no greater burden than these essentials: that you abstain from things sacrificed to idols and from blood and from things strangled and from fornication; if you keep yourselves free from such things, you will do well.