delizzle
Active Member
I am working on getting a blanket endorsement from the Chaplaincy Full Gospel Churches.Uh, what body is endorsing you?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I am working on getting a blanket endorsement from the Chaplaincy Full Gospel Churches.Uh, what body is endorsing you?
I find it odd that a seminary student at Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary has no denominational convictions. If you are, indeed, attending Liberty, you should be immersed in Baptist theology and doctrine. And Rob is right, military chaplains are typically endorsed by a recognized ecclesiastical body. To quote Hamlet, "Something is rotten in the state of Denmark".
Or maybe it is because they "read" - and this section of the board is for "other Christian denominations" of which even Christianity Today 2015 admits that the Adventists are the 5th largest Christian denomination in the world.
so yeah -- a good place to post.
Are you here because you want to become a Baptist? Do you know much about cults, especially the doctrines of the SDA? Do you agree with the biblical warnings which seek to protect the sheep?
No, I have no desire to become a Baptist. Cults? That word is thrown about very easily these days by people who don't agree with another persons faith tradition. As an adherent of the Latin or Western Rite of Christianity that charge comes my way regularly. The SDA? Yep, I agree, they a bit off kilter what with Ellen White and her writings. Jim Jones was a leader of a cult, as was David Koresh. Of course I agree with the biblical warnings, but who is coming up with the proper interpretation of them?
My apologies on the citing the wrong university.Bethel University, not Liberty University. But a Baptist Seminary nonetheless.
I do hold to theological convictions.
It's interesting that you do draw a line in the sand. You name two cult leaders. Why them?
Yes and that is the reason I have always said there are babes in Christ in the cults - kidnap victims.The first step in stealing away the sheep (if they really could) is to legitimize themselves to us (Evangelicals). A child isn't going to get into the car of a scary-looking man, but a man in uniform, with some apparent legitimacy, that might be another story. They need affiliations like TGC desperately, and they tone down the EGW propaganda in order to win the favor of people in positions of power in organizations like that.
The SDA pretends to be an ecumenical organization, but anyone who has been involved with the group, its members or teachings, knows what they think of us.
Like all cults, their tactics work well on the weak-minded and emotionally needy. That's who they prey upon, and there are a couple who would fit the bill on BB, which is why I am bringing this to light.
My apologies on the citing the wrong university.
That is interesting. Your seminary claims to hold to theological convictions. Are you in agreement with those convictions?
Yes and that is the reason I have always said there are babes in Christ in the cults - kidnap victims.
God allows it - Why?
HankD
Bethel University, not Liberty University. But a Baptist Seminary nonetheless. I do hold to theological convictions. I just don't settle for any single brand of Christian religion.
I haven't heard a sermon about false teachers in a decade or more, and I think that's a problem.
in this case it is because you are falsely accusing others.Yes and that is the reason I have always said there are babes in Christ in the cults - kidnap victims.
God allows it - Why?
HankD
I think they must do it to to cause you misery. I think it is working.Good question, and it has a very obvious answer. They are here to proselytize.
Not in the way that you or I might do evangelism, in which we openly and honestly try to persuade others of our beliefs. They are much more cleaver, covert and they have a far more long-term and much more massive plan.
They want, fist of all, to legitimize their cult in order to gain a seat at the Evangelical table, which that have succeeded in doing in many cases. I'll let an ex-SDA member explain the rest.
Start at 39 minutes:
Let us not sit by as the wolves are actually inside of the sheep pen. You might be strong enough to resist, but there are vulnerable members among us. Please defend them, if not yourselves.
thatbrian said: ↑
Good question, and it has a very obvious answer. They are here to proselytize
Or maybe it is because they "read" - and this section of the board is for "other Christian denominations" of which even Christianity Today 2015 admits that the Adventists are the 5th largest Christian denomination in the world.
so yeah -- a good place to post.
I didn't ask if cult members were allowed to post here, Bob. I asked, why would they want to spend their time here. That's a different question
Brian, I have watched over souls for many decades as a pastor, youth director, deacon, Sunday School teacher, etc.I haven't heard a sermon about false teachers in a decade or more, and I think that's a problem. The NT is full of warnings and instructions regarding this matter, but we have fallen asleep while on watch.
We have allowed, even invited, them right into the front door, and we are too nice to call a spade a spade, and we are too ignorant to see the wolf under his sheep's clothing, as in the case of the SDA.
As to why, that's in God's hands. The elect are safe, Hank.
"For false christs and false prophets will arise and perform great signs and wonders, so as to lead astray, if possible, even the elect." (Matt 24:24)
"I give them eternal life, and they will never perish, and no one will snatch them out of my hand." (John 10:28)
I have actually written to Dale Ratzlaff's 'ministry', in rebuttal to the error and misuses of various quotes, etc, among other things, and do you know what they wrote back, even on the Sabbath specifically, and Michael, etc? Nothing. They neither responded to it in their 'magazine', which I have read, and personally laughed at and wept over [its kinda mixed really]. It's a sad joke. They only post and reply to what they would classify as hate/anger mail, and then show their 'audience/readers' how terrible these 'people' are, or they accept the weakest arguments from those who do not know any better, but look to make a showing, and lampoon them. When a real Seventh-day Adventist, who knows their Bible [KJB] and the SoP/ToJ [Spirit of Prophecy/Testimony of Jesus] confront them and reply to their diatribe, they clam up, and say nothing, or make a big bluster and switch the issue, or they go to complain on their own personal closed forums [which you cannot really get into to respond to, unless you prove to them you are ex-SDA, by background check through conference, etc.] Pitiful.Good question, and it has a very obvious answer. They are here to proselytize.
Not in the way that you or I might do evangelism, in which we openly and honestly try to persuade others of our beliefs. They are much more cleaver, covert and they have a far more long-term and much more massive plan.
They want, fist of all, to legitimize their cult in order to gain a seat at the Evangelical table, which that have succeeded in doing in many cases. I'll let an ex-SDA member explain the rest.
...
Let us not sit by as the wolves are actually inside of the sheep pen. You might be strong enough to resist, but there are vulnerable members among us. Please defend them, if not yourselves.
That could indeed be your problem and why you limit your posts to emotional arguments, creative writing - and one-off anecdotal stories.