Lists 20 court cases, mostly divorce cases, pre-nuptials, or child custody cases where the typical story was a judge ruling using the terms of a pre-existing Sharia agreement between the two parties rather than following state laws. No new laws were created. Most of the erroneous rulings were overturned. There was even one case, Rhodes vs. ITT Sheraton Corp., where a judge refused to allow the case be moved to Saudi Arabia so it could be tried under Sharia law. The reason given was because "Sharia law exhibits a systemic bias against women and non-Muslims."