Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Your point is beside the point because it goes without saying that the 99.9% who reject the Constitution Party are the voters in the last election. The statistic only talks about voters; and only voters matter.Originally posted by LadyEagle:
CMG, let's look at the 99.9% of Americans you say reject the CP.
First of all, what percentage of Americans even vote? How many voted the last election?
PA Jim or Poncho can probably tell you the percentage, which I can't. But say 40% of Americans vote. (The number is probably lower.) That already knocks down your 99.9%.
Of those, say 40% of voting Americans, how many of them even know or care anything about what is really going on? Probably 10%. The vast majority of Americans doesn't even know what is going on other than what they are pablum fed on CNN or the big 3. And how many of that percentage even heard of any other party than the Demopublicans? The point is, it is not 99.9%. But I love ya anyway.![]()
How can the American people reject a political party of which the vast majority have never heard?Originally posted by church mouse guy:
No wonder that 99.9% of Americans reject the Constitution Party.
well the way he comes across with his conspiresy theorys he sure sounds like he does.Originally posted by Pennsylvania Jim:
Rooster, if you think Poncho buys into the mass media, you'd better read around here before you stick your foot in your mouth.
Exactly. Isn't it ironic that the lemmings who are not lifelong junkies spending time in mental hospitals are drinking the Kool-Aid of the neocons in the Republican Party?Goering was a lifelong junkie who spent time in a Swedish mental hospital after World War I.
The power will not return to Saddam, but the power will go to whichever sect is victorious in the coming civil war in Iraq. Our military will be caught in the middle to be beheaded by either the Sunnis or the Shiites - which ever one gains ultimate control and implements the genocide of civilians which will follow.Will Peroutkistas ever admit that their plan to pull out of Iraq and their calling of the war illegal implies that they may support the return to power of Saddam?
Don't fall for the Bush shuffle here. There were WMD at one time. But by the time Bush was ready to invade, there were no usable WMD in Iraq. The "evidence" Bush trotted out were "biological weapons trailors" later determined to be used for generating hydrogen. And the "WMD" were a couple of unusuable artillary shells with some sarin and mustard gas.Good Question. here's another one: Will they ever admit the facts that there were WMDs
In the sense that after Osama declared that Saddam was an apostate who should be killed, Saddam invited Osama to visit him in Iraq. For some reason Osama was suspicious of his motives. Wouldn't you have been?and there were connections between al quaeda and Saddam?
Bush is consistant with his stands, the only shuffle going on, is the Kerry flip-flop shuffle, if there are no wepons of mass-destruction, or plans for making them, then why are terrorist trying to get Sadams WMD scientist women released from the jail? You actualy think thats all they found, a few unusable shells with sarin, and mustard gas? They found more than they'll let us know about, and if Sadam had a little sarin, and mustard gas, you don't think there is more where that came from, or maybe he moved his WMD to a safer location, and maybe we havent hit the real pay dirt yet. WMD are not the only issue here, Sadams evil dictatorship, makes people like Castro, or Kaddafi look like angels, Sadam had to go, no matter what it took, or takes, you seriously think terrorist have control of the war, or even a chance to win it? they are goming to a gun fight with a knife, they will lose.Don't fall for the Bush shuffle here. There were WMD at one time. But by the time Bush was ready to invade, there were no usable WMD in Iraq. The "evidence" Bush trotted out were "biological weapons trailors" later determined to be used for generating hydrogen. And the "WMD" were a couple of unusuable artillary shells with some sarin and mustard gas.