I meant Priscilla but too late to edit.
-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Women "Co-teaching" adult S.S.
- Thread starter Reynolds
- Start date
It was not an assembly. Paul is addressing function in the assembly.
Have you eaten swine flesh today? Forbidden by the scripture you know.
The context of the chapter is corporate worship.
Permitted by The New Covenant Hank. Thats a very bad example.
Perhaps Reynolds but I think you would be surprised how few within the 4 walls of Christendom could justify a ham and cheese sandwich or going to church on Sunday rather than the Sabbath.
The ignorance of the average Sunday morning social club attendee does not amaze me in the least.
Which chapter?
You harkened to "Paul's explicit prohibition of women teaching men in church".
Where's that explicit prohibition to be found?
Chapter and verse please.
I Tim 2:12
That says a woman is not to be lecturing or dominating her husband.
Not sure where you are getting the "men in church" stuff.
Not sure where you are getting the "men in church" stuff.
The chapter title in most Bibles is "Instruction for worship." I know where the titles come from.
I cor 14:34
Last edited:
Galatians 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
So therefore man can lay with man and woman lay with woman. Gay marriage is perfectly fine. Women shall be the senior pastors. You believe all that?
That verse is not applicable. It speaks of spiritual equality and only of spiritual equality.
reynolds you seem confused concerning the élan vital of the Christian. It is not the Law as you crudely suggest.
We are led by the indwelling Holy Spirit which has never led me into the suggested activities above.
But The Spirit has for instance led me into bible studies of the Small Group nature wherein I have learned wisdom of gold, silver and precocious gems from the participating female gender children of God.
Using the words coined by a French philosopher discussing evolution to make excuses for dismissing God breathed commands.
There are times when "crude" is warranted.
you seem to be a judge of many things Reynolds. have you read Bergsons book?
Apparently not.
Also the phrase 'Elan Vital' has taken on a life of its own apart from Enri Bergson.
it is the life force of a movement. He made the phrase popular.
and actually it is opposed to Darwinian evolution which was random and in degrees of success by chance.
yes he believed in a type of evolution which - as opposed to Darwin - it had an embedded plan and direction contained in the creature (DNA but it ha not been discovered yet), actually he was more of a creationist than an evolutionist.
Myself i am a 6 sidereal day creationist, I always have been.
i used Bergson theory as a springboard to debate young earth creationism with my university brethren.
anyway i am not under the law so again your crude example of legalism was useless to me.
Again - I have learned from women both as teacher and student.
speaking of crude - i took Hebrew in my school days, my professor (still alive) was/is a converted rabbi.
on the 1st day of class a young woman showed up - which from his former days vas verbotten!
and he said he had to show the class how "colorful" and down to earth Hebrew is.
we ended up in Leviticus with "crude" passages such as yours.
She dropped the class which seemed to be the plan.
Our Greek professor welcomed her and all women to his class. Funny how that works
Paul was not under the law when he prohibited women from teaching men.
Are saying that since you are not under the Law, homosexuality is not sin???
I find your line of reasoning to be extremely non linear.
Reynolds, you make a statement then use it to come to a wrong conclusion.
Homosexuality is sin forbidden by the law.
but our life principle is not the law. The just shall live by faith and whatsoever is not of faith is sin.
Paul looked for perfection in the saints and perfection only came through the fruit of the Spirit namely agape love.
if we have a temptation to wander from the leading of the Spirit then if we acknowledge our sin He is faithful and just to forgive us our sin and to cleanse from all unrighteousness.
Presumably if we do our part and acknowledge our sin He will do His and forgive AND cleanse us from it.
If we find ourselves still entangled in sin after several years perhaps then we need intervention.
Do you need prayer bro?