There have been so many topics on women, and their roles in this world. Everything from Women as Pastors, to Women Deacons, to Women in Politics. And the result seems to be the same. Women have taken a beating in recent posts, especially when her ambitions bring her out of the kitchen and bedroom, and take in into a theater of employment, or, service/employment and carrers that have been traditionally ruled by men.
So, while my question is PURELY hypothetical, I wanted to ask this question, especially of those men who see the role of women restricted to the home - barefoot, pregnant, raising the kids, making the meals, cleaning the house, and being at the beckon-call of her male counter-part - if they would consider using a female surgeon for, let's say, a life threatening illness, such as, a quadruple heart by-pass.
The thought behind my question is simple. You need this surgery, and she is the only doctor who can do this surgery. She's considered the very best, never lost a patient, and a male doctor is not available at any time, for any cost, in time to operate aand serve you, the patient???
The clock is running, it's your turn to answer this highly hypothetical question.
Shalom,
Pastor Paul :type:
So, while my question is PURELY hypothetical, I wanted to ask this question, especially of those men who see the role of women restricted to the home - barefoot, pregnant, raising the kids, making the meals, cleaning the house, and being at the beckon-call of her male counter-part - if they would consider using a female surgeon for, let's say, a life threatening illness, such as, a quadruple heart by-pass.
The thought behind my question is simple. You need this surgery, and she is the only doctor who can do this surgery. She's considered the very best, never lost a patient, and a male doctor is not available at any time, for any cost, in time to operate aand serve you, the patient???
The clock is running, it's your turn to answer this highly hypothetical question.
Shalom,
Pastor Paul :type: