• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

WOMEN PREACHERS

Me4Him

New Member
This world is "patterned" after the "Spiritual".

The "MOON" (Church) get it's "light" from the "SUN" (Jesus, spirit light of the world) and reflect it to a world in "darkness".

God planted a "Seed" for Spiritual bread, man plants seed for "natural bread".

The seven day week is God's plan for the earth, Six days of work, another day of rest, or Mill reign.

Jesus is "head" of his "bride" the church, man is head of his bride.

The "list is "long", but here's the point.

The church being the "BRIDE" is the "woman" in this parable, and the woman responsibilities is to "produce children" (new converts) raise up/teach them.

The "truth" manifested in the world tells us that a "Woman/Woman" can't produce children, it requires a "MAN/WOMAN".

Remember the parable of the woman who had seven husbands, all died??

Mt 22:24 Saying, Master, Moses said, If a man die, having no children, his brother shall marry his wife, and raise up seed unto his brother.

Mt 22:28 Therefore in the resurrection whose wife shall she be of the seven? for they all had her.

Being made "SONS OF GOD", make us "Brother to Jesus", and like the parable, "OUR BROTHER" has died and went to Heaven, leaving us with the responsibility to "marry his BRIDE" and "raise up children to him".

The "pattern" of this world forbids a woman/woman from producing children, and being patterened after the spiritual, neither can a woman (pastor) and the "bride of Christ" produce children either.

This is why only "MEN" are called to pastor, only a man with the "Spirit" (Sperm) can get the "WOMAN" (church) pregnant to produce children.


Ro 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, (in the physical world)
 

Debby in Philly

Active Member
Originally posted by Debby in Philly:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Debby in Philly:
Taking that as a given, and also taking the thought that God does and says things for a good reason or purpose, what is that good reason or purpose? Going beyond "Because He says so."
Axioms:
1. It is unbiblical for a woman to pastor or preach.
2. God does things and says things for good reasons and purposes.

Question:
What is the reason?
</font>[/QUOTE]Third try:
I am not looking for reasons like "Because God says so" or "woman was created first." Those are negative, punitive reasons. I want to know WHY God made this pronouncement - in the sense of why does that work better, or is better for us, than if either gender could pastor/preach, etc. It certainly has nothing to do with talent or ability. So what is it?
 

menageriekeeper

Active Member
I think Satan played on Eve and exploited something there,
I think Satan played on more than just Eve. Adam had a choice here. He could have chosen to lead in this situation and refused the fruit. Remember, Adam had been around longer than Eve and certainly had more experience with what God required.

Adam failed to lead, and a good many men still fail to lead, or they lead in the wrong direction.

I'm with Scarlett, a better conversation would be, what men should be doing instead of just what women shouldn't be doing.
 

Scarlett O.

Moderator
Moderator
Originally posted by menageriekeeper:
...a better conversation would be, what men should be doing instead of just what women shouldn't be doing.
Sister, you hit the nail squarely on the head and did so with much more tact and finesse than did I.

Thank you.

Peace-
S.O.
&lt;&gt;&lt;
 
I had also written:

We men should take and bear the responsibility but we don't. I think we have inherited Adam's disposition.

not sure if you saw that.

Adam consciously eating of the fruit was a type of Christ, willfully laying down his life for his bride. He didn't eat being deceived thinking he would be as gods.

Now, all have sinned and fell short of the glory of God. And again, men bear the ignominy.
Let's discuss what men should be doing, I'm all for it.
Number one in the context, let's love our wives as Christ loved the church. Well, he layed down his life for her. That's a pretty high standard.
 

Rachel

New Member
Originally posted by Scarlett O.:
Here's a novel idea.

But perhaps it's a little too liberal for the BB.

Instead of constantly, (and I mean to the point of making me nauseous), constantly pointing out that women have multiple restrictions placed on them...

...why don't we EVER, EVER on the BB talk about the responsibility of men behind the pulpit or in the home.

And I'm not talking about the ruling over women. That's a grievous punishment that women are forced to bear. That's not a man's right nor privilige. He didn't earn it. That between women and God.

I am talking about a man's responsibility before God Almighty to his church and his home.

I know of and I know that YOU know of plenty of men who have gotten behind the pulpit and misquoted scripture, used the pulpit for political purposes or just to rant and rave, hurt people's feelings intentionally, told things that weren't true, preached unpreparedly, and generally used the pulpit as a place of vocalizing his opinions and winning popularity contests.

I think we females on the BB get it about women.

We should.

There is a constant flow of threads on this board dictating to women what we can and cannot wear, what we can and cannot say, if we can or cannot work outside the home, if we can or cannot voice an opinion that is contradictory to our husbands, and .....well, it just never, never, never, NEVER ends around here!

OK!! We get it! Women are restricted in all facets of life. We get it!

Let's talk about men awhile. Won't that be novel?

OK, so women are "banned" from preaching.

It's just my personal opinion, and for pity's sake, I know I am just a woman...

...but I think that in discussing a woman's banishment from leadership in the church or the home or the nation should automatically lead to a discussion on a man's serious and solemn duty to preach and lead under the authority of God.

It's serious business, being behind that pulpit.

And there is enough stupidity behind the pulpit on television and irresponsibility behind the pulpit in America in general to warrant LOOOOONG discussions on the BB about just how men who are behind the pulpit should view themselves in a most humble manner and in a manner that is ever submissive to God and ever in constant spiritual prostration before God.

We don't ever seem to want to talk about that.

We have talked to DEATH, (and I mean to the DEATH of a lot of women's spirits around here), about how women are restricted in the church and in the home.

Why dont' we talk about how that makes a man accountable before God in ways that he could never imagine and maybe never has imagined.

Or is that too "touchy" of a subject?

Peace-
Scarlett O.
&lt;&gt;&lt;
&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;STANDING OVATION FOR SISTER SCARLETT!!!&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;

applause.gif
woohooo!! You go girl! :D I've only read up to your post here, and had to say that!
thumbs.gif
 

IveyLeaguer

New Member
Originally posted by menageriekeeper:
Adam failed to lead ...
I suspect Adam loved Eve so much, that he chose her over God, knowing their relationship could no longer exist with Eve in her fallen state. If he wanted her, he would have to eat as she did.

Originally posted by menageriekeeper:
. . a good many men still fail to lead, or they lead in the wrong direction.
I couldn't agree more. Especially regarding the wrong direction.
 

menageriekeeper

Active Member
That's quite romantic IveyLeaguer, but I can't find any scriptural basis for it.

Might make for an interesting hypothetical conversation though. What would God have done with Woman if Adam hadn't eaten too?
 

IveyLeaguer

New Member
Originally posted by menageriekeeper:
That's quite romantic IveyLeaguer, but I can't find any scriptural basis for it. Might make for an interesting hypothetical conversation though. What would God have done with Woman if Adam hadn't eaten too?
I agree.
 

IveyLeaguer

New Member
Scarlett O.:
Speaking as one of those evil feminists . .
My dear Scarlett,

Hopefully, you know I did not call you an evil feminist or even a feminist. With one exception, which had nothing to do with theology, I've never attacked anyone about anything and since you are one of my favorites and I so enjoy your posts ..
, I'll try to explain where I'm coming from.

As I see it feminism is a philosophy (woman --&gt; does NOT = feminist) and has little or nothing to do with equal rights, justice, and absolutely nothing to do with equal standing under God. Please keep that in mind because it is absolutely integral to everything I am saying. A man is not superior to a woman, just equipped differently, which is what I had in mind when I said, "a mature, godly woman takes a back seat to NOBODY, regardless of what her role may be."

Scarlett O.:
If you want to blame women for the world going to hell in a handbasket, that's fine ... We do share in part of the blame ...
But you misunderstand, Scarlett darling (apologize, couldn't resist, Gone With The Wind is my favorite movie
saint.gif
). In fact I think the exact opposite, as I'll explain below. And I disagree about women having their fair share of the blame ... I think men are responsible for it all, and when the books are opened it will be men either 1) losing reward, if saved, or 2) receiving greater punishment, if unsaved. With the greater authority comes the greater responsibility.

Scarlett O.:
Women struggle with inner rebellion against men and sometimes act too bitter and angry with it ... But wouldn't you also say that men struggle with "entitlement" issues and sometimes act too condescending with it? ... Wouldn't you agree that the one struggle wickedly feeds the other one?
Yes, I would agree with those.

Scarlett O.:
Wouldn't you agree that if women stopped rebelling that men would stop acting as if they were somehow entitled to rule over women? And wouldn't you agree that if men acted more protectively and with more humility that women would behave more peaceably and more respectfully?
I think men should love their wives as Jesus Christ loves His church, as revealed in the Scriptures, and act accordingly. Otherwise, when exercising biblical authority outside of marriage it should be done in a godly way. Women, and men, should look to God, repent, ask His help in ejecting cultural, worldly influences that we have given permission to dominate us, and be constantly on guard for these influences that God has warned us to have nothing to do with - exactly as He has made clear from Genesis to Revelation. I believe that would do it.

Scarlett O.:
It's not the "evil" feminism that has warped our culture. Feminism, whether in its evil form or even its practical and wise form, rose as a response from something that existed before it that was not edifying to women.
I didn't imply that but I would technically agree, though there's much more to it. Feminism is but one of several hundred philosophies that make up our present culture, but it's predominant nature cannot be ignored in much of the Western world. I realize it is unpopular to use the term 'evil' these days but I am sold out to calling things what they are (given a great degree of certainty), especially evil, just as our Lord did. We can use 'ungodly', which is softer, or 'unbiblical' or 'wrong' which is softer still - but I don't see the point when talking to other Christians, since we're not trying to please the world.

I'm not sure what you mean by feminism's "wise form" but I suspect we are not far apart on that, mostly terminology. But though I'm open to the idea, I see nothing wise about feminism.

Feminism is either partly or largely responsible for the proliferation of such things as the destruction of the family, homosexuality, abortion - to name just a few of the major ones. There are many minor products of it - for example, the 'nerdization' of at least two generations of men. In describing a key entity responsible for those things, far from being harsh, I think 'evil' is the appropriate word.

Feminism appeals directly to human pride, and both men and women are affected by it. For example, that's where the "entitlement and condescension" element comes from - pride - and as a man that's the battle I had and the temptation I constantly watch for. I didn't have it bad, but Satan is very fond of using it and it can come, and usually does, from nothing more than reading Genesis. It precedes feminism of course, by thousands of years, but feminization has exacerbated it greatly, making it much worse of a problem. Listening to you ladies, it must be much worse than I realize (I've avoided threads on this subject until this one).

Scarlett O.:
... But men have their fair share of the blame, too.
Much more than our fair share. The evangelical church is into full-blown apostasy and few in the church are even aware of it. The leaven from which this apostasy arose can be traced back some 200 years but was symptomatic in the early 20th century and has exploded in growth the past 25 years. Sure, Satan has been and IS NOW working harder than ever to destroy the church, God is sovereign over all, and everything is right on schedule. But I can't think of a woman who bears any responsibility for it - Jesus gave the leadership of His church, and its inherent responsibility, to men.

So, the culprit of the friction you have been talking about in this thread is .. pride, both within and without feminism. Nothing is really new under the sun.

Deeper still, feminism has, at its core, a bold and direct defiance of Jesus Christ. It says, "I dont care how you made me or what you intended or made me for I will do and be what I want to be and live the way I want to live." That's why I doubt many regenerate women are actually 'real' feminists, though they think they are.

Though the similarity ends there, this core-level defiance is virtually the same as the defiance of homosexuality, as homosexuality says, similarly, "I dont care how you made me or what you intended ....". NOTE: I AM NOT SAYING the two are remotely the same, except to the extent they share that core characteristic.

Finally, like most evil influences, feminism comes well disguised, and that's why I previously said "Since there is no choice but to interact with feminized culture I greatly empathize with Christian women today." I would hope that for most people that is a chilling thought, and I pray for everyone to consider the danger and "take stock under God" as Oswald Chambers would say. Time is short.

[Please excuse my straightforward 'tone of warning'. That is the work the Lord has called me to do, and I don't have the luxury of mincing words, as these are life and death matters.]

These are perilous times and the simple message, I believe, for all of us right now, myself first, is the same and will often apply across the board to other issues: Repent, look to God, confess, walk in the light, watch (for ungodly and unbiblical influences, deceptions of every kind, and for the Lord Himself) and pray, and watch and pray, and watch and pray ....

God Bless.
 

Scarlett O.

Moderator
Moderator
Originally posted by IveyLeaguer:
Hopefully, you know I did not call you an evil feminist or even a feminist.
Oh, my goodness...I know that you were not referring to me when you were talking about feminists. I was just letting you know that I am one. ;)

... I think men are responsible for it all,...With the greater authority comes the greater responsibility.
And my whole point stems from this premise. I am not disagreeing that men have spiritual authority and the greater responsibility.

I am saying that in so many cases with men, that "entitlement" issues and "rank" or "privilige" issues come from the fact that men are many times dismissing or abandoning their responsibilities and desiring ONLY their authority.

When a man, as a pastor or a husband or a father or community leader, bases his manhood solely on his authority and ignores his responsibilities, he has become of no value to those he is in authority over.

This is a very serious issue that so many wives and women in general wish that men would address. And whenever we bring it up, we are considered nags or feminists or shrews or sometimes even worse.

Men are first of all, responsible and accountable. Their authority did not come first.

Men are in authority because of the responsibilites God gave them.

The responsibility is what comes first. And it is the ONLY thing that counts in the end.

Men will receive no reward in heaven whatsoever for just being "in authority". He will receive rewards in heaven or lose rewards in heaven based on his life's account being settled with God.

Man's authority is not a badge of honor nor is it ever a reason for entitlement. It is an area of his life that requires him to DO something. Man's authority a job description, if you will, not job "title".

Titles, when worn all by themselves, are empty and fruitless.

I'm not sure what you mean by feminism's "wise form" but I suspect we are not far apart on that, mostly terminology. But though I'm open to the idea, I see nothing wise about feminism.
Yours is a very commonly held opinion, especially with conservative people, so let me explain what I mean when I say that I am a feminist.

I do not believe in organizations like NOW.
I do not believe in lesbianism.
I do not believe in abortion.
I do not believe in the concept of "man-haters". In fact, I happen to like and appreciate men very much indeed, for a variety of reasons, contrary to what I may sound like.

However, there are a lot of things happening around the globe in the name of a man's authority over a woman that is sinful and evil. I speak out very vocally against them.

For example:

In the country of Mexico, if a woman brings divorce proceedings against her husband because he has committed adultry, all he has to say before the judge is that he was not getting from his wife, at home, what he "wanted" and the charges of adultry are dismissed. The divorce can proceed, but not the adultry charges. The bible says that adultry is a sin.

Female "castration" (I can't go into any specific explanation on this forum) is still practiced all over the world on female children. The practice itself and the reasons for it are so that a husband can be "assured" that this wife will never want to have sex with another man. Of course, it also insures that she won't even want to have sex with her own husband, but then again in many parts of the world, that doesn't matter at all. The bible says that a wife's body belongs to her husband and that a husband's body belongs to his wife and that they should give themselves to each other and not "deny" each other.

In the United States, on the internet alone, not even counting movies, televison, and men's magazines, there is enough profane visual imagery of women being demeaned, abused, and generally debased as human beings to the point that it makes one wonder just how much worse Soddom and Gormorah could have possibly been. The bible says that women are to be protected as the "weaker vessel", not turned into hideous icons to be violated.

I could continue on here, I do have more to say...., but I will stop there, since it is almost 2:00 in the morning.

As a woman who considers herself a feminist, I feel compelled to speak out against man's misuse of his authority over women whether it be illegal, immoral, unethical, or unbiblical.

And I promise, I do not do this in opposition to men, but in opposition to abuse of power.


Please excuse my straightforward 'tone of warning'.
I am not offended in the least. People should be honest with other and speak the truth.

Peace-
Scarlett O.
&lt;&gt;&lt;
 

bapmom

New Member
Scarlett, my friend,

yours is indeed the "wise" form of feminism. Maybe you should call yourself a "ladies advocate", as the term feminist has become so intertwined with the "femi-nazi" attitude here in America.

So you are what Id call a Conservative Feminist! So am I!
 

IveyLeaguer

New Member
Scarlett O.:

... let me explain what I mean when I say that I am a feminist.

I do not believe in organizations like NOW.
I do not believe in lesbianism.
I do not believe in abortion.
I do not believe in the concept of "man-haters". In fact, I happen to like and appreciate men very much indeed, for a variety of reasons, contrary to what I may sound like.

... there are a lot of things happening around the globe in the name of a man's authority over a woman that is sinful and evil.

As a woman who considers herself a feminist, I feel compelled to speak out against man's misuse of his authority over women whether it be illegal, immoral, unethical, or unbiblical ... And I promise, I do not do this in opposition to men, but in opposition to abuse of power.

... I was just letting you know that I am one. ;)
Scarlett, if that's what you call a feminist, then count me one as well.
 

IveyLeaguer

New Member
Scarlett, I'm curious. Your description of feminism has nothing in common with the ungodly feminism I described at length in the earlier post. By your standard, which seems perfectly biblical, most everyone here would consider themselves feminists.

Since the whole of western civilization understands feminism to be the unbiblical kind associated with all sorts of abominations (abortion is their #1 issue), why do you associate yourself with them by using their name?
saint.gif
love2.gif
 

Marcia

Active Member
I see IveyLeaguer's point, Scarlett. I don't think what you've described is feminism as the world usually uses that word -- what you described is the idea of treating women as human beings equal in worth to men, and advocating that they not be abused or taken advantage of.

But feminism as it started in the 70's and as the world understands it goes way beyond this, though often femimnists try to downplay it and make it sound like it's just a matter of treating women humanely. When you get down to it, though, they are pro-abortion and support other things such as gay rights.

The problem is with how one defines "feminism."
 

Scarlett O.

Moderator
Moderator
Originally posted by IveyLeaguer:
Scarlett, I'm curious. Your description of feminism has nothing in common with the ungodly feminism I described at length in the earlier post. By your standard, which seems perfectly biblical, most everyone here would consider themselves feminists.

Since the whole of western civilization understands feminism to be the unbiblical kind associated with all sorts of abominations (abortion is their #1 issue), why do you associate yourself with them by using their name?
saint.gif
love2.gif
It's simple. I don't consider the word to be "their name".

Feminism is defined Merriam-Webster's dictionary as being organized activity on the behalf of women's rights and interests and a theory of political, economic, and social equality of the sexes.

The term, in and of itself, is quite benign.
 

Marcia

Active Member
The term may be benign but it is a politically charged term in our culture. I would never, for example, tell an unsaved woman that I was a feminist without making it clear what I mean by that.

Scarlett, I'm curious, were you old enough in the 70's to remember the rise of feminism in this culture and what it entailed?
 

Scarlett O.

Moderator
Moderator
I'm 44. I know the ugly ramifications of the word.

I also know that by not allowing the word in its truest form to be used leads to the polarization of women into stereotypical "camps".

We are either "June Cleaver" or we are "Jane Fonda".

I reject both of those images.
 
Top