• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Would you receive sprinkling?

Status
Not open for further replies.

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Please post the name of a denomination that teaches that baptism by sprinkling “administers grace.” Lutherans teach that water baptism is a work of God through which He confers grace to the recipient,

So, confer vs. administer.

A distinction without a difference.

(Former Lutheran here.)

Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo.
 

Craigbythesea

Well-Known Member
On the one hand,baptizoclearly means to 'dip' or 'immerse,' and the ordinance symbolizes the dying to the old life and rising to the new.


On the other hand, we may be in danger of straining out gnats and swallowing camels. 'For the LORD does not see as man sees; for man looks at the outward appearance, but the LORD Looks at the heart' (1 Samuel 16:7).
I do not wish to be guilty of straining out gnats, but the Baptist Sunday school teaching that the Greek word βαπτίζω means, in the New Testament, to ‘dip’ or ‘immerse’ is incorrect. For the true meaning of the word βαπτίζω in the New Testament, please see pages 164-165 in the BDAG lexicon.

IMO, the far greater problem with Baptist churches is Pastors baptizing people who show no signs of repentance or new birth, so that they can boost their numbers. This is nothing else than sending people to hell with a pocket-full of false promises.


In my church, we had a chap who was obviously saved, but who was a very nervous individual who suffered from panic attacks and couldn't bear the thought of putting his head under water; it scared him silly, yet he really wanted to be baptized. On the day of his baptism, our Pastor had a jug with him and would have poured water on him if he couldn't go through with full immersion. In the event, God strengthened him to go through with it, but I would have had no problems accepting baptism by pouring in his case because his heart was obviously right with God.


The man is now a deacon in the church and as fine a Christian as you would wish to see.


Amen! Amen! And Amen!
 

Craigbythesea

Well-Known Member
So, confer vs. administer.

A distinction without a difference.

(Former Lutheran here.)

Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo.
Please post the name of a Lutheran synod in the United States or anywhere else in the world that teaches that water baptism administers or confers grace, rather than that water baptism is a work of God through which He (not the baptism!) confers grace to the recipient, and that it is not a work of men, but a work of God. This is not a mere technicality, it is fundamental to the teaching of the Lutheran Church!
 

agedman

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The MODE of Baptism is relatively unimportant as it is a SYMBOL, a representation of what has already taken place.

If one understands that it is merely representing what has already transpired, then the method is of little importance, for it carries no particular blessing or grace in the act, but is that of obedience.

Too often the symbol and the tradition of a church gains so much importance and such a priority that folks assume that it means far more than the original statement of a public display of a change of loyalty.

So, certainly, any mode of baptism can be recognized by the local congregation and it be Scriptural. The same way as one doesn't need "baptized" with water if they are in a desert that is filled with sand, but can just as effectively be covered over with the sand and "raised to walk in newness...."

What IS important is that baptism follows conversion, and the desire is from the impulse of the Holy Spirit to be obedient.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Countless millions of people have been baptized by all three methods, and so far not so much a one Baptist has ever shown any evidence that God is not satisfied with all three methods.

Yes well since you are a solid conservative that must be true. Rolleyes Apparently not a Baptist.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Those who call themselves Baptists who believe other than what Baptist hold to. Maybe we should call them transbaptists. Whistling
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Please post the name of a Lutheran synod in the United States or anywhere else in the world that teaches that water baptism administers or confers grace, rather than that water baptism is a work of God through which He (not the baptism!) confers grace to the recipient, and that it is not a work of men, but a work of God. This is not a mere technicality, it is fundamental to the teaching of the Lutheran Church!
Lutherans believe that water baptism is a means of grace and creates faith in the infant being baptized. I only know WELS and LCMS, but that is what they believe.

Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo.
 

Craigbythesea

Well-Known Member
Lutherans believe that water baptism is a means of grace and creates faith in the infant being baptized. I only know WELS and LCMS, but that is what they believe.

Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo.
Please post the name of a Lutheran synod in the United States or anywhere else in the world that teaches that water baptism administers or confers grace, rather than that water baptism is a work of God through which He (not the baptism!) confers grace to the recipient, and that it is not a work of men, but a work of God.
 

Martin Marprelate

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I do not wish to be guilty of straining out gnats, but the Baptist Sunday school teaching that the Greek word βαπτίζω means, in the New Testament, to ‘dip’ or ‘immerse’ is incorrect. For the true meaning of the word βαπτίζω in the New Testament, please see pages 164-165 in the BDAG lexicon.
I have spent long hours in the past debating the meaning of baptizo with Presbyterians on the Puritan Board, but I didn't expect to have to do so on the Baptist Board. o_O

There is a very handy book called The Meaning and use of Baptizein by T.J. Conant (Wakeman Great Reprints. ISBN 1-870855-31-0). It lists every occurrence of baptizo not only in the NT, but also in the whole of Greek literature including the Church Fathers, so that the interested party may work out for himself what the meaning is.
There are plenty of figurative meanings: people are baptized with sleep, drink and grief; ships are baptized in the sea; warriors baptize their swords in each other's entrails, but the meaning is always compatible with 'dip,' 'dunk' or 'immerse.' I never heard of anyone sprinkling his sword in someone else's entrails. ;) Much the same information may be found in John Dagg's Manual of Church Order.

Also, whilst I would not give tuppence for the theological views of the Greek Church Fathers, they should at least know the meaning of a Greek word. They have always baptized by immersion, and do so to this very day.
 

Martin Marprelate

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
How is it that some Baptists are unaware that our early Baptist forefathers practiced water baptism by affusion rather than by immersion? Perhaps we Baptists of today should honor that Baptist tradition!
Once again, I'm amazed that this should come up on a Baptist Forum. I think, with respect, that you are thinking of certain Anabaptists. The earliest Baptist Confession of Faith of which I'm aware is the London 1644:

XXXIX.
That Baptism is an ordinance of the New Testament, given by Christ, to be dispensed only upon persons professing faith, or that are Disciples, or taught, who upon a profession of faith, ought to be baptized (Added later: "...and after to partake of the Lord's Supper.")

Acts 2:37, 38; 8:36-38; 18:8

XL.
The way and manner of the dispensing of this ordinance the Scripture holds out to be dipping or plunging the whole body under water: it being a sign, must answer the thing signified, which are these: first, the washing the whole soul in the blood of Christ; secondly, that interest the saints have in the death, burial, and resurrection (of Christ) ; thirdly, together with a confirmation of out faith, that as certainly as the body is buried under water, and rises again, so certainly shall the bodies of the saints by raised by the power of Christ, in the day of the resurrection, to reign with Christ.

1) Mat. 3:16; John 3:23; Acts 8:38
2) Rev. 1:5; 7:14; Heb. 10:22
3) Rom. 6:3-5
4) 1 Cor. 15:28, 29


I mentioned the Greek Church fathers in my earlier post. Here are some examples of their understanding of baptizo. Remember, I am not advocating their theology, only their understanding of a Greek word:

1. Cyril of Jerusalem, Instruction III, on Baptism XII. ‘For as Jesus assuming the sins of the world died, that having slain sin He might raise you up to righteousness; so also you, going down into the water, and in a manner buried in the waters as He in the rock, are raised again, walking in newness of life.’

2. John Chrysostom. Comment on 1Cor. Discourse XL. I. ‘For to be baptized, and to sink down, then to emerge, is a symbol of the descent into the underworld, and of the descent from there. Therefore Paul calls baptism, the burial, saying, “we were buried therefore, with Him by the baptism into death.”‘

3. Athanasius. Discourse on the Holy Passover, 5. ‘In these benefits you were baptized, O newly-enlightened; the initiation into the grace……has become to you an earnest of resurrection; you have the baptism as a surety of the abode in heaven. You imitated, in the sinking down, the burial of the Master; but you rose again from there, before works, witnessing the works of the resurrection.’

4. Gregory of Nazianus. Discourse XL, on the holy Baptism. ‘Let us therefore be buried with Christ by the baptism, that we may also rise with Him. Let us go down with Him, that we may also be exalted with Him; let us come up with Him, that we may also be glorified with Him.’
 
Last edited:

rlvaughn

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Surely you do not mean to imply by using the word “compromising” that Baptists who disagree with your interpretation of the Bible are compromising what the Bible teaches—for such an implication would be, in my opinion, a serious injustice. Therefore, I request that you explain what you are attempting to express to us.
Craig, here I mean "to accept standards that are lower than is desirable" or "to make concessions". If a person or church professes to believe that immersion only is baptism and then accepts something other than immersion as baptism then that person or church is making concessions and accepting something for what it is not. The compromise has to do with the person's own convictions. So, for example, if you don't believe that immersion only is baptism then you are not compromising. I would still think you are wrong, but not compromising.

Countless millions of people have been baptized by all three methods, and so far not so much a one Baptist has ever shown any evidence that God is not satisfied with all three methods.
What would you accept as evidence?

For the true meaning of the word βαπτίζω in the New Testament, please see pages 164-165 in the BDAG lexicon
I've seen word studies that go both ways. But I find it interesting that the churches in the east who spoke Greek rather than Latin immersed. Unless they've changed, the Greek Orthodox Church still practices immersion today.

Please post the name of a denomination that teaches that baptism by sprinkling "administers grace."
"The sacrament itself confers grace from God just because the infant is baptized." Roman Catholic
"Ordinarily this [the new birth] is effected, by the Holy Spirit, through baptism, as the means of Grace...The children need Grace: baptism confers Grace. It is specially adapted to impart spiritual blessings to these little ones." G. H. Gerberding, Lutheran
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Please post the name of a Lutheran synod in the United States or anywhere else in the world that teaches that water baptism administers or confers grace, rather than that water baptism is a work of God through which He (not the baptism!) confers grace to the recipient, and that it is not a work of men, but a work of God.
I just did.

"Baptism is a powerful means of grace by which God grants faith and the forgiveness of sins' --LCMS website

http://www.lcms.org/faqs/doctrine#purpose

Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
See the attached paper on Baptism
 

Attachments

  • the_relation_of_faith_and_baptism_--_by__larry_smetak.pdf
    51.5 KB · Views: 5

rlvaughn

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
In place where rivers and ponds ice over, folks wait until spring and summer to baptize.
Perhaps there are places where that is a necessity if things freeze solid, but the presence of ice is not necessarily a deterrent. A number of years ago we were visiting relatives in Missouri. The place where they baptized was iced over. They cut the ice and baptized anyway.

John Leland must have thought that way when he wrote:
Christians, if your hearts Are warm,
Ice and snow can do no harm;
If by Jesus you are prized,
Rise, believe, and be baptized.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top