Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I understand the point you are making. But, was Jesus any less God when his human body died?
John 4:7 There cometh a woman of Samaria to draw water: Jesus saith unto her, Give me to drink.
John 4:9 Then saith the woman of Samaria unto him, How is it that thou, being a Jew, askest drink of me, which am a woman of Samaria? for the Jews have no dealings with the Samaritans.
As a man Jesus had faith or trust in the woman at the well that she would draw some water for him so that he could have a drink. He was thirsty.
As God, in His omniscience he knew she would. As God He didn't need faith.
As man, he put his confidence or trust in her believing that she would be kind enough to comply with his request. And she did. He did not act upon his omniscience or omnipotence (forcing her). He acted as a man, by faith.
John 4:8 (For his disciples were gone away unto the city to buy meat.)
If we assume that it was Christ that sent the disciples back for bread or food (just assume), then we can say that he had faith that they would return with bread. He wasn't forcing them. He wasn't using omnipotence. He wasn't using omniscience to our knowledge, though he could have. He was simply acting as a man, believing that his disciples would come back safely, bringing food with them.
Both of these are examples of faith. Faith does not always have to do with salvation.
I think Winman made the observation: "A Calvinist can't understand the concept of faith." But I think he was thinking specifically of OR.Ain't faith wonderful!:thumbs: I ask for a drink of water and exercise faith. I send my disciples for food and I exercise faith. The sun will rise in the morning and if I am alive I will see light even if it is overcast and I exercise faith. As I said: Ain't faith Wonderful!:thumbs:
Main Entry: 1faith
1 a : allegiance to duty or a person : loyalty b (1) : fidelity to one's promises (2) : sincerity of intentions
2 a (1) : belief and trust in and loyalty to God (2) : belief in the traditional doctrines of a religion b (1) : firm belief in something for which there is no proof (2) : complete trust
3 : something that is believed especially with strong conviction; especially: a system of religious beliefs <the Protestant faith>
synonyms see belief
Looking to Jesus, the founder and perfecter of our faith, who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is seated at the right hand of the throne of God.
Hebrews 12:2 ESV
Rob
Is faith based on blind trust, or is based on knowledge?
When Peter tried walking on water and sunk, was that failed faith? Then he reached out to Jesus and Jesus lifted Peter up and back to safety.
Cheers,
Jim
This is the crux of the matter.I believe Jesus had all power, yet simply refused to exercise it. That's why he did not need to have faith.
That is a very good question. I think I'll start another thread for it.Just what Divine attributes did Jesus Christ lay aside? The Apostle Paul states: For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily. [Colossians 2:9]
This is the crux of the matter.
As God, God has need of nothing. Otherwise he would not be God. God does not need faith.
But God became man and dwelt among us, and John said: "we beheld his glory.." The Word (Christ) became flesh.
Hebrews 11:1 Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.
God is omipotent, omniscient, omni-present. As such he needs no faith. He needs no hope. He knows all that will happen. He doesn't need the evidence of things not seen. He is omniscient. He doesn't have to hope for anything. There are no deficiencies in God.
When God became a man, he laid aside some of these divine attributes, or at least chose not to exercise them. That does not mean he was not the God-man, or was not God in any sense of the word. He was still God. But as God he had the perfect right not to exercise some of his attributes, and so he did. Thus, as a man, taking upon himself human nature, there were many occasions in life were he put his faith in others. He became dependent on others. He relied on others. When he gave commands to his disciples, he didn't force them to carry them out. He expected them to do it out of love and obedience. And that expectation was by faith. It is the same faith that a parent has in their child to obey. Faith is trust, confidence.
Biblical faith is trust or confidence in God.
Perhaps. Even most of the time, probably. But we will never know for sure. The Bible doesn't make itself clear on whether or not he was always exercising his attribute of omniscience when he was with his disciples.DHK, I don't disagree with you too often, but I do here.
I don't think Jesus had faith in his disciples; he knew what they would do.
There are times in his life where he had to set aside certain of his attributes. He set aside his omnipotence and allowed himself to be taken captive, scourged, nailed to the cross, suffer and die. Why didn't he use his omnipotence and call thousands of angels from his heavenly Father. The reason: he laid aside his divine attribute of omnipotence--that he was all powerful.I don't think he laid aside his divine attributes to incarnate; I think he laid aside his glory. That is different. I agree with what Swaimj said previously.
He was the God-Man. But there were times when he laid aside his divine attributes, that is, he did not exercise them.So I don't think Jesus had faith, certainly not the kind we do. He didn't need faith because he knew the Father intimately from eternity, even in his incarnation as a man.
There are times in his life where he had to set aside certain of his attributes. He set aside his omnipotence and allowed himself to be taken captive, scourged, nailed to the cross, suffer and die. Why didn't he use his omnipotence and call thousands of angels from his heavenly Father. The reason: he laid aside his divine attribute of omnipotence--that he was all powerful.
He confined himself to one place at a time. He walked through Samaria. He wasn't omnipresent when he was on this earth. That is another attribute that he laid aside.
When he was an infant he laid aside almost all of his attributes and was completely dependent upon his parents. There he had to have trust and faith in Mary.
He was the God-Man. But there were times when he laid aside his divine attributes, that is, he did not exercise them.
And there were times where he forcefully exercised his power as in the raising of Lazarus from the dead, walking on water, etc.
No, I didn't mean to imply that. By setting aside, I meant that he deliberately chose not to use certain divine attributes.I believe Jesus set them aside in the sense of choosing not to use these powers at certain points (at other points he did use his attributes, such as omniscience), but I do not believe he set them aside in the sense of not having them or not being able to use them.
Maybe because it wasn't Jesus' will, but the Father's will that kept Him from knowing certain things. He was always doing the Father's will.Are there circumstances under which Jesus chooses to know something, but in other circumstances chooses not to know? How can He turn it on and off at will?