"Most of them?" How can you say you can speak with any authority against "most" IFB churches when, by your own admission you know NOTHING about 99.9% of them?
Its called a random sample and its a basic statistical method. The pharmaseudical companies that make your aspirin do the same thing. They take out a handful of pills from the MILLIONS they create and test them for all the criteria the gov says aspirin should meet and then authoritatively tell us that the bottle on the shelve will help relieve your headache.
Alternately, the blood pressure meds they created were tested on a handful of people out of all the millions of people who potentially might take and be effected by the drug and then draw all sorts of authoritative conclusions on efficacy and side effects.
Here we have 3 random samples: Myself, ABCgrad and Gina. (I'm leaving out Tiny Tim because his sample is very similar to ABC's) Our random samples include churches from Michigan to Alabama and several points in between (myself), West Virginia (ABC) and Ohio to the west coast (Gina). Each of our experiences becomes a random sampling of churches. That makes 3 random samples. Not only can we draw conclusions from any of our samples, but comparing the 3 gives us even more infomation.
Such as: We all have good and bad experiences. Is it 50/50? Not in my case. In my case its about 30% bad to 70% okay. Probably ABC and Gina (though they would have to confirm) have the same ratio of good IFB church experiences to bad. That means the majority of IFB churches are solid Bible believing churches.
But if a blood pressure med has a 30% failure rate, there is an obvious problem somewhere. Lawsuits are going to abound, the government is going to step in and the people affected are going to be up in arms! (if they aren't dead or irreversibly harmed)
How big does the problem of abuse in the IFB church have to be, before IFB churches take action? How long will individual churches stand back and say: "we can't help what another church does, OUR CHURCH doesn't do things that way" all the while questioning the veracity and integrity of the VICTIM!
Debbie has already in this thread spoken of a situation in her church and plainly said "I don't believe their lies." (quote from Dcorbett post #39 of this thread) Herein lies one of the roots of the problem. We "can't believe he/she would DO that!" so the victim must be lying.
Is this a problem only in the IFB? NO!
Should we ignore the problem in the IFB because other denominations have the same thing going on? NO!
I tell my children often that bad behavior on the part of someone else doesn't excuse their own bad behavior. The IFB as a denomination should take up the discussion of abuse. Quit hiding it, quit looking the other way because that "could never happen in my church", quit abusing the victims a second time by calling them liars and worse, and start looking for solid Biblical answers to prevent pastors from becoming "little dicatators", to realize that there are wolves in sheep's clothing that seek to cause problems in the church and to prevent such problems from simply moving from one "independent" church to the next without anyone knowing of the problems they carry with them.
It would be nice if we had perfect churches, but ignoring the problems don't make them go away.