I’m combining revmwc and hankd since their responses are similar.
You gentlemen have pointed out another of the many contradictions that futurists typically claim as truth.
You both have said a day unto the Lord is like a thousand years to man, but then you want to say the (I’ve never been convinced for one second that either of you believe that is to be taken as literal, but let’s suppose you actually do) 1,000 year Millennium is an actual literal 1,000 years in man’s terms. Obviously it can’t be 1,000 years it has to be converted to be consistent by your logic. You can’t have it both ways. So is the 1,000 millennium converted to God’s time and becomes one day to God (which would mean the 7 days of creation you like to literalize is 7,000 years by man’s time).
Or is it converted to man’s time and then it becomes 365 million years by man’s time which seems to play a little havoc with your second coming scenario.
You have painted yourselves into another messy corner you can’t get out of without making up more illogical and weird interpretations.
Just keep going down this road and you all will start sounding like Mel.
Only a Preterist view works here. Preterists too differ on the exact meaning of the 1,000 years, but I would say it is the 40 year period between crucifixion and 70 AD.
I’m still waiting for you to just own up to the fact that no where does the bible say that Christ will come back a long time in the future, some distant generation etc.
We all know admit it or not that Preterists own the time statements in the New Testament. Each day that passes your hole just gets deeper.
We see Peter saying "one day to the Lord is as a Thousand years and a Thousand years as one day" again this is to the Lord not man.
We also see in a prayer of Moses the Man of God these words from Psalms 90 verse 4 "For a thousand years in thy sight are but as yesterday when it is past, and as a watch in the night."
A thousand years is but Yesterday in God's sight, not just Peter tells us that 1000 years is as a but So too Moses (as it is attributed too) in Psalms 90 said it too.
The point again God's shortly and quickly is based on how HE views time not us, God is not Slack Peter Said. Here is the word for that from the Greek:
Strong's Number: 1019 bradu/nw
Original Word Word Origin
bradu/nw from (1021)
Transliterated Word Phonetic Spelling
Braduno brad-oo'-no
Parts of Speech TDNT
Verb None
Definition
to delay, be slow
to render slowly, retard
to be long, to tarry, loiter
He is not slow.
Look at the context of what Peter is speaking,
2 Peter 3:1 This second epistle, beloved, I now write unto you; in both which I stir up your pure minds by way of remembrance:
2 That ye may be mindful of the words which were spoken before by the holy prophets, and of the commandment of us the apostles of the Lord and Saviour:
3 Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts,
4 And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation.
5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water:
6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:
7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.
8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.
9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.
Notice He starts out with a reminder verse 1 "...
I now write unto you; in both which I stir up your pure minds by way of remembrance" he was writing to stir their memory. There memory about what, first remember what the Prophets wrote and second remember what the Apostles taught.
Then he says this "Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts,". Here is what they will say "Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation." That sounds very similiar to the preterist claim that Chirst has already come. In fact sounds a little like this "how can you possibly believe that a thousand years to us is like a day to the Lord" (logos1 on post #23) on this thread.
He then speaks of the time of the earth being covered with water that world perished, Peter says just as this world will persih. He follows with the statement one day to the Lord is as a Thousand years and a thousand years as one day. Then verse 9 states this "The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance."
Clearly saying the Lord isn't slow to come but is "longsuffering" patiently waiting to bring men to repentence. In verse 10 He caps waht he was talking about, "But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up." The day of the Lord is slow in coming and will be as a thief in the night. But it will come so don't lose heart brethren, it may be a while but He will come, it might even take 2000 years but it will come as a thief in the night. Because scoffers will be saying He has come or He will not come, but don't lose heart God isn't slow as some men count slowlness but is patiently working to bring men to repentence.