1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

COMMON-ground?

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Skandelon, Jul 24, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Top Posters
Page 3 of 11
  1. Earth Wind and Fire

    Earth Wind and Fire Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    33,911
    Likes Received:
    1,663
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Clarify your last statement; Really you need to read the "Doctrines Of Grace" book & stop misrepresenting Calvinists.
     
    #41 Earth Wind and Fire, Jul 25, 2011
  2. Iconoclast

    Iconoclast Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    2,305
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Skan,
    I did thank you for at least offering a basis for your claims and posting statements from grace people.
    Yes, you did acknowledge the seperation of the two kinds of love spoken of.
    there is an issue as we saw last week on another thread...dealing with stage cage calvinism...which is addressed in churchs who believe the doctrines of grace. We should speak often about God's love.....In Christ.....and God's goodness to all men,as I have alluded to in other posts.
    Some of what the article is addressing is because there is a resurgence of calvinism world wide.
    People are tired of the watered down,emotional mush that leads to false God dishonoring religion. They study the bible and see the truth and severity of the issues involved and almost focus in on the severe side...in an unbalanced way. This I have seen several times along the way.It should be addressed and corrected.
    I do not believe God loves all men savingly....or all men would be saved.
    I do not believe God loves men in hell.
    I read alot these days and I can assure you that this article is misleading as it was used.
     
    #42 Iconoclast, Jul 25, 2011
  3. Earth Wind and Fire

    Earth Wind and Fire Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    33,911
    Likes Received:
    1,663
    Faith:
    Baptist
    OK so let me see if I can nail this shut....

    God loves the Elect as a Father loves His Children. God loves the Non Elect as a Creator loves that which He creates. The Creator's love for the created does not extend to salvation.

    Blessings,
     
    #43 Earth Wind and Fire, Jul 25, 2011
  4. Iconoclast

    Iconoclast Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    2,305
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian

    Benjamin,
    I will respond in green to calm you down,and avoid your paranoid red ink comments
    Once again I see we are not close to being on the same page. You seem disturbed by whatever I post. That's okay to a certain extent, but before you go off ranting it would be nice if you read with comprehension what I post before you disagree.....or call me a child of the devil, or teaching darkness:laugh: For example here in your reply you say this;

    If you look back on the closed thread...you will see that it was me who offered romans 5...and romans 8:28-39 into the whole discusssion:thumbs:
    So now you post it as if it is new to the discussion?    Then you say;
    I like this verse alot...God is Holy ,Just ,and Good,...he is not the author of sin....what kind of comment do you want? Nothing I have posted suggests otherwise. I think you have a root of bitterness inside you that you hold onto that makes you get all frustrated or something.....your thoughts run together and eventually are not coherent. Your hatred of some of the doctrine is causing you to have a break from reality it seems.:(here is another example of it;
    I pointed out [not boast], that the book of acts and the apostolic preaching does not sound like the false idea you offer. I also pointed out that the word does not appear....but that the love of God is in the Son.....
    You can not even be honest enough to agree with me on this...but post this last personal charge against me as if I did not qualify my statement    .

    Benjamin..sorry you are struggling with these teachings so much...but keep studying and maybe the light you speak of will dawn on you. There are many resources available...but if you do not use them it will not help. many of us would like to help, but you seem unable to process what is being put forth, as your responses show a dis-connect with the issues being discussed.
    A non -cal has a hard time knowing what calvinism is, much less "hyper- calvinism'....if someone says the word elect...you go into a rant, and robert snow posts...calvinism bad....
     
    #44 Iconoclast, Jul 25, 2011
  5. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,916
    Likes Received:
    241
    I have read calvin institutes, systematic Theology of Hodge, and Berkhof theology......

    not trying on these posting to give accurate either Arms/cals...

    just showing what theology we tend to end up with IF we hold 1 divine Attribute superior to another...

    I was actually parroting Hyper Arm/Hyper Cal!
     
    #45 JesusFan, Jul 25, 2011
  6. Earth Wind and Fire

    Earth Wind and Fire Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    33,911
    Likes Received:
    1,663
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Yes & you were scaring me professor
     
    #46 Earth Wind and Fire, Jul 25, 2011
  7. Luke2427

    Luke2427 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,598
    Likes Received:
    23
    Who said God does not love all people?

    I wonder if this whole thread is a strawman.

    God does love all people- but not the same. EVERYONE SHOULD agree on that.

    For just one of many examples that could be given: God does not have filial love for people who are not his children.

    It would be MADNESS to deny that.

    And the bible does confirm that God get no pleasure in the death of the wicked, etc, etc, etc...

    But NO ONE with any rational theology denies that God damns them just the same. Whether he does it with sadness or not- he saves some and he damns (condemns) other.

    Nothing could be plainer in the Bible than that.

    I despise hyper-calvinism not because it doesn't push us to love everybody and sing cumbaya with our arms all locked together around the world-

    I despise it because it ignorantly robs God of glory. The Gospel is to be preached to every single person that we can possibly preach it to. But for this reason- God's name deserves to be published as broadly as possible. The hyper-cal in their effort to keep the Gospel from being something to be proffered (which I agree with) swings the pendulum in the dangerous direction of failing the Great Commission. The Great Commission is about proclaiming the name of God to every creature.

    Anyone who does not wish to do this has a HORRENDOUS problem with their theology.
     
    #47 Luke2427, Jul 26, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 26, 2011
  8. Earth Wind and Fire

    Earth Wind and Fire Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    33,911
    Likes Received:
    1,663
    Faith:
    Baptist
    When they tell you that because you werent a Christian (in their mold) at the time of your infants death that you put your child in hell, then you know your dealing with a Hyper Calvinist:mad:

    Who doesnt love you Baby!
     
    #48 Earth Wind and Fire, Jul 26, 2011
  9. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,916
    Likes Received:
    241
    or if you run into a Christian who would teach that NONE need to get preached to, that NO Evagelism needed today, as God will save his elect ones regardless!

    Or IF one holds that God has a "Double predestination" Plan going, that he actively elects both the saved and the damned, skirting close to hyper circles!
     
    #49 JesusFan, Jul 26, 2011
  10. glfredrick

    glfredrick New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    4,996
    Likes Received:
    2
    Would you then hold to a universalistic perspective concerning God's salvation?
     
    #50 glfredrick, Jul 26, 2011
  11. glfredrick

    glfredrick New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    4,996
    Likes Received:
    2
    Anyone who would hold to that perspective is heretical and not a follower of the Christ of the Bible.

    The other argument you made about double predestination is a logical argument drawn from some understandings concerning the Doctrines of Grace. Double predestination is false because we are ALL damned to die a sinner's death save for Christ, our only hope.
     
    #51 glfredrick, Jul 26, 2011
  12. Skandelon

    Skandelon <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,638
    Likes Received:
    1
    I suppose the articles quoted from Piper and MacArthur were stawmen arguments too?

    Maybe you missed this part of the article:

    "I am troubled by the tendency of some - often young people newly infatuated with Reformed doctrine - who insist that God cannot possibly love those who never repent and believe.

    I encounter that view, it seems, with increasing frequency.
    The argument inevitably goes like this: Psalm 7:11 tells us "God is angry with the wicked every day." It seems reasonable to assume that if God loved everyone, He would have chosen everyone unto salvation. Therefore, God does not love the non-elect. Those who hold this view often go to great lengths to argue that John 3:16 cannot really mean God loves the whole world.

    Perhaps the best-known argument for this view is found the unabridged edition of an otherwise excellent book, The Sovereignty of God, by A. W. Pink. Pink wrote, "God loves whom He chooses. He does not love everybody." [1] He further argued that the word world in John 3:16 ("For God so loved the world...") "refers to the world of believers (God's elect), in contradistinction from 'the world of the ungodly.'"    [2] - MacArthur

    And if you'd read through the thread you'd see that I conceded that Calvinist affirm a different kind of saving love for his elect within your system. MacArthur explains that quite well in his article and this post was never intended to deny that distinction. It was to at least acknowledge what SHOULD be our common ground.

    I agree. The question is this: On what basis does God condemn them?

    Scripture says they perish because they refuse the truth of the gospel so as to be saved.(2 Thess 2:10) Calvinists seem to teach that they are condemned because God didn't elect to save them, but to leave them in their fallen condition and thus without even the ability to accept the gospel truth....a condition HE determined to be the natural condition of all men from birth due to Adam's Fall.

    I totally agree. But I'd just add that the other reason is, "how will they believe unless they hear?" The gospel is preached to make an appeal to the whole world, "Be reconciled to God." "For whosoever believes will be saved." Its that appeal which STRONGLY implies all men have the ability to respond.

    The few proof texts used by Calvinists to suggest people DON'T have that ability can clearly be shown to be written within the context of Israel's being temporarily hardened from the truth and thus not even having access to the gospel yet (ref John 6). The other is clearly in reference to man's inability to submit to God's law, not his ability to believe in the One who fulfilled the law for us. (ref. Rom 8). Thus, there is NO biblical reason to suggest that the gospel is insufficient to supply all that is needed for men to have the ability to respond to its appeal.

    Luke, also you only touched on one point of the OP. You neglected to address the part about God's desire for all to be saved. Granted you did say, "And the bible does confirm that God get no pleasure in the death of the wicked, etc, etc, etc..." But if you don't get pleasure in your kid lying, doesn't that suggest you desire that he not lie? In the same way can't you confirm that God desires all men everywhere to repent and be saved? If he doesn't take pleasure in their perishing, isn't that the only conclusion, especially in light of all the passages which clearly say that is His desire?
     
    #52 Skandelon, Jul 26, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 26, 2011
  13. Skandelon

    Skandelon <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,638
    Likes Received:
    1
    You neglected the aspect of God's desire for all to be saved...
     
    #53 Skandelon, Jul 26, 2011
  14. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,916
    Likes Received:
    241
    God loves all people, as he is involved in their creation, they are to a degree still "made in image of God"
    BUT
    God is a God of holiness and love, both Infinite levels
    So God desires to save those whom He has loved, and that group will be in the Elect of God...

    God used election in OT to select out Abraham and coming Jewish nation based upon His Covenetal love, like way he established a new Covental love towards His NT elect, the saints...

    basis of ANY getting condemned is due to ALL being found by god to be "In Adam" so the fall of Adam brought ruin spiritually to ALL born after him, while only those found by God "in Christ" will be redeemed and heaven bound!
     
    #54 JesusFan, Jul 26, 2011
  15. Skandelon

    Skandelon <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,638
    Likes Received:
    1
    So on the one hand you argue that God does have a common love for all his creatures, but doesn't desire all of them to be saved? What about the points made by other Calvinistic scholars which do affirm this desire?
     
    #55 Skandelon, Jul 26, 2011
  16. Earth Wind and Fire

    Earth Wind and Fire Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    33,911
    Likes Received:
    1,663
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I have not worked that part out yet....if your sending a non-elect to hell & then saying you love him ?
     
    #56 Earth Wind and Fire, Jul 26, 2011
  17. Martin Marprelate

    Martin Marprelate Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Messages:
    8,917
    Likes Received:
    2,133
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Psalm 5:5-6. 'You[God] hate all workers of iniquity. You shall destroy those who speak falsehood. The LORD abhors the bloodthirsty and deceitful man.'

    Proverbs 6:16-19. 'These six things the LORD hates, yes seven are an abomination to Him: a proud look, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that are swift in running to evil, a false witness who speaks lies, and one who sows discord among brethren.'

    Mal 1:3. 'Yet Jacob I have loved; but Esau I have hated, and laid waste his mountains and his heritage for the jackals of the wildreness.'

    Steve
     
    #57 Martin Marprelate, Jul 26, 2011
  18. Benjamin

    Benjamin Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    8,443
    Likes Received:
    1,172
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Are you able to recognize a distinction between the views of "Universal Atonement" and "Universalism"? If so, then you should understand when I tell tell you that I am not a Universalist. If not, I suspect you might be looking for a strawman.
     
    #58 Benjamin, Jul 26, 2011
  19. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,916
    Likes Received:
    241
    Understand what you are asking here...

    Would say that God DOES both love and desire all to be saved in the sense that Jesus died and atoned for all peoples BUT

    That per His own wisdom plans purposes He deceeded to have chosen amoung the reprobate race of man His own peculiar peoples, to be called after His own name...

    God chose Abraham, who was following moon god at the time...
    God chose Moses, while he was wandering around
    God chose to make jewish peoples into isreal, His own OT Covenant peoples
    God chose the Apostles

    ALL of them were God selecting and chosing out of the rank and file His own men to further his plans and purposes

    their is a mystery here as to who/why/how, but do know that God was doing all of this, per His divine Will, and that as it is written 'The hidden things are in God" Per Isaiah 48:6!
     
    #59 JesusFan, Jul 26, 2011
  20. glfredrick

    glfredrick New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    4,996
    Likes Received:
    2
    I well understand the difference and I am not looking for a strawman. I am decidedly against intentional fallacies like that and prefer to simply deal with truth.

    I just have difficulty in understanding your take on these things, for what you write seems to indicate that you are traveling toward universalism. If the atonement is universal, then you have an additional problem to deal with, i.e., the inability of God through Christ to actually accomplish what He set out to do via the atonement. If he took the sins of the whole world (every soul, forever) then why are some still not saved. There are two responses, either Christ did not atone for every one or universalism. There really is no middle ground.
     
    #60 glfredrick, Jul 26, 2011
Page 3 of 11
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...