So there is NO tension AT ALL in the Arm/Non-Cal view? NONE? NOT a BIT? Just want to be clear what you are saying?
Interesting, as Arms state that we need to have God apply effectual Grace towards us, than we are "free" to accept/reject Christ, NON Cals say that we Just need the Gospel to be preached only!
Arms state can lose their salvation, Non cals disagree!
Non cals see Cross as being propiation thru penal substitution, while Arms thru moral influence...
NO DIFFERENCES?
It makes perfect sense for a calvinist to urge someone to believe if God has told us to do it. We are to obey God even if we can't understand how it works.
We are commanded to preach/teach the Gospel, as the Lord will wake up/open up His elect thru that means/method...
-Not quite, an consistent Arminian would not pray for God to save someone, because that might violate their free will... but for God to make every effort to draw them, and leave the response up to them.
Classical Arminianism would really not have a basis to pay to God, as the Lord, as that system states God enables ALL to be "woke up", up to us to respond correctly and get saved!
-Again, if God has commanded we pray, then it makes perfect sense to pray, regardless of whatever else God has also told us or not told us about how he works.
-Also, it is the calvinist who can pray for God to actually save someone, since the calvinist believes God can and should override that person's rebellious will and turn it to himself.