1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Babababa Bad to the Bone, Naturally or Not?

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by humblethinker, Aug 22, 2012.

  1. Iconoclast

    Iconoclast Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    2,305
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    JL Dagg;
    Depravity is natural to man; it is born with him, and not acquired in the progress of life. It is not to be ascribed to evil habit, or evil example. Evil habits are formed by evil doing; and evil doing would not be, if there were no evil propensity. Evil example would not everywhere exist, if human nature were not everywhere corrupt; and the tendency to follow evil example would not be so common, and so much to be guarded against, if it were not natural to man. The Scriptures clearly teach this doctrine. "Behold, I was shapen in iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me."[16] The psalmist did not mean to charge his mother with crime in these his humble confessions, but manifestly designs them to be an acknowledgment that his depravity was in-woven in his nature, and bore date from the very origin of his being. The Saviour taught, that which is born of the flesh, is flesh.[17] The term flesh, which is here opposed to spirit, signifies, as it does in other places, our depraved nature. It traces human depravity up to our very birth.

    As every individual of our race is born of depraved parents, and brings depravity with him into the world, we are led to conceive of it as propagated from parent to child. This accords with the representations of Scripture; "Adam begat a son in his own likeness."[18] It accords also with analogies to which we are familiar.



    http://www.founders.org/library/dagg_vol1/bk4c3.html
     
    #21 Iconoclast, Aug 22, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 22, 2012
  2. percho

    percho Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    7,556
    Likes Received:
    474
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Me either I just believe man will always choose to do evil things and to the degree of just what evil is even infants choose to do evil in the concept of disobedience.


    Just had a thought.

    Do we learn to be obedient or do we learn to be disobedient. Is one a natural concept and the other a learned concept?

    Think about this verse.

    Though he were a Son, yet learned he obedience by the things which he suffered;

    Now I believe Jesus being conceived by the Spirit God was born obedient, so did he learn obedience or did he through sufferings learn what obedience is?
     
    #22 percho, Aug 22, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 22, 2012
  3. Winman

    Winman Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2009
    Messages:
    14,768
    Likes Received:
    2
    Well, all I can say is that Isa 7:16 shows that even a child can refuse evil and choose good. I didn't say that, God did.

    Mat 12:33 Either make the tree good, and his fruit good; or else make the tree corrupt, and his fruit corrupt: for the tree is known by his fruit.

    I had a big debate over this verse with Aaron a week ago or so, but I believe Jesus is clearly teaching that we have both the option (either, or else) and the ability (make) to choose whether we are a good tree that brings forth good fruit, or a corrupt tree that brings forth corrupt fruit.

    The words "either" and "or else" clearly indicate option, the word "make" clearly indicates ability.

    So I do not agree with you that man will ALWAYS choose evil, man has the ability to refuse evil and choose good according to scripture.
     
  4. Winman

    Winman Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2009
    Messages:
    14,768
    Likes Received:
    2
    And yet the scriptures continue to say we are made in the likeness or similitude of God well after the fall.

    Gen 9:6 Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.

    This was spoken by God well after "the fall".

    Jam 3:9 Therewith bless we God, even the Father; and therewith curse we men, which are made after the similitude of God.

    This was said well after "the fall" and I would say your view of Total Depravity is actually a fulfillment of this verse, saying evil and cursing men who are made after the similitude or likeness of God.

    We do not "make ourselves" as Dagg erroneously teaches.

    Psa 100:3 Know ye that the LORD he is God: it is he that hath made us, and not we ourselves; we are his people, and the sheep of his pasture.

    God does not make evil. And this verse was also written well after "the fall".
     
    #24 Winman, Aug 22, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 22, 2012
  5. psalms109:31

    psalms109:31 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2006
    Messages:
    3,602
    Likes Received:
    6
    Double post
     
    #25 psalms109:31, Aug 22, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 22, 2012
  6. humblethinker

    humblethinker Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,285
    Likes Received:
    1
    Did God make an "evil propensity" in Adam?
     
  7. psalms109:31

    psalms109:31 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2006
    Messages:
    3,602
    Likes Received:
    6
    WInman saId
    I say
    The point I was making is Adam was never in total image of the Father and Jesus has always been!
     
    #27 psalms109:31, Aug 22, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 22, 2012
  8. Aaron

    Aaron Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    20,253
    Likes Received:
    1,381
    Faith:
    Baptist
    :applause:
    :applause:
     
  9. Aaron

    Aaron Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    20,253
    Likes Received:
    1,381
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Nope. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit. A corrupt tree cannot bring forth good fruit.

    God made Adam good, but not incorruptible, so the question is: What corrupted Adam?
     
  10. Cypress

    Cypress New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    Messages:
    376
    Likes Received:
    0
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by psalms109:31
    Genesis 3:22
    And the LORD God said, “The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and live forever.”

    Adam did not have the knowledge of good and evil pre-fall and sinned, Jesus had the knowledge of good and evil and did not sin.

    What does that mean to you?


    I say
    The point I was making is Adam was never in total image of the Father and Jesus has always been![/QUOTE]

    I say it means he disobeyed the only law we know existed for men. A direct command from God.
     
  11. percho

    percho Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    7,556
    Likes Received:
    474
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I am not saying we can't do anything that is good, I'm saying all will do just enough evil to justify death. It don't take but one little lie and I can't remember my first one. :)
     
  12. Winman

    Winman Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2009
    Messages:
    14,768
    Likes Received:
    2
    Yes, but when Jesus became flesh he took on the complete nature of the seed of Abraham. He had to defeat sin and Satan as a man to atone for us.

    The scriptures say he was made like his brethren (the Jews) in ALL THINGS. He suffered being tempted. God cannot suffer being tempted, he cannot be tempted (Jam 1:13). The scriptures say he could be "touched with the feeling of our infirmities", he felt our temptations and weaknesses just as we do. The scriptures say he was tempted in ALL POINTS like as we are, not just hunger, or thirst, or being tired, yet without sin.

    1 John 4:1-3 warns that if any man denies Jesus came in the flesh, that is the spirit of antichrist.
     
  13. percho

    percho Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    7,556
    Likes Received:
    474
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I vote for Satan.
     
  14. Winman

    Winman Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2009
    Messages:
    14,768
    Likes Received:
    2
    Correct, it only takes one sin to condemn us. Saying that man can do good does not argue man can earn salvation, he would have to be 100% perfect as Jesus was to earn salvation.

    It is no different from our laws, you could live all your life as a model citizen, but if one day you walk in a bank and rob it, all your good deeds are not mentioned, but you are convicted for the one crime you committed and must pay the penalty under the law.

    Many folks have the concept it is like a balance, if you do more good than bad you will be saved, if you do more bad than good you will be lost. This is total error, man's law does not work like this, and neither does God's.

    So saying a man has the ability to do good in no way implies he can merit salvation.
     
    #34 Winman, Aug 22, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 22, 2012
  15. humblethinker

    humblethinker Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,285
    Likes Received:
    1
    What does it mean to consider a corrupt tree? Is it not the case that there can never and will never be a fruit that can be considered good from a corrupt tree? That's easy....

    But, if you mean to say that there cannot be a tree thatproduces good fruit and bad fruit then I say let's research the issue and see if this is observably and demonstrably correct. Let's see... what horticulture websites can we consult... Does anyone have any real life observations they've been able to make (I don't have any fruit trees). Would you say that if such an event, even if it only happened once, would pose a problem for your interpretation for which your current understanding could not explain?
     
  16. percho

    percho Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    7,556
    Likes Received:
    474
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I say it means he disobeyed the only law we know existed for men. A direct command from God.[/QUOTE]

    Methinks the first man Adam was made corruptible subject to death so that the Lamb could die and be raised from the dead incorruptible with eternal life.

    I understand that all others here do not believe the Son of God died in the concept of needing to be given eternal life, but if he did not I see no way according to the word of God that the penalty for our sin has been paid.

    Adam was created subject to death because it had been determined before he was created the Lamb, a man conceived by the Spirit God with the woman taken from the first man would die. Somebody was going to be deceived, sin and bring death to all men.

    The first man Adam was the figure of him to come. Jesus the Son of Man, the Son of God.
     
  17. humblethinker

    humblethinker Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,285
    Likes Received:
    1
    It seems that here is where I have a problem... I don't think even then man would be able to earn salvation... what does it mean for someone to earn something for which he has no need of it? For that matter what does it mean for God to graciously give man salvation that he does not need and which is therefore useless? In your view what need is there for redemption for such a man? If there is no need then how could it make sense to even talk as though it is a significant thing that he earned or was gifted salvation?

    <I've really got to get to work! West Texas here I come! Gonna download some podcasts and audiobooks for the trip!>
     
  18. percho

    percho Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    7,556
    Likes Received:
    474
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Amen brother I am happy you and me agree on something.
     
  19. Cypress

    Cypress New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    Messages:
    376
    Likes Received:
    0
    A: Good cannot bring forth evil
    B: Adam was good
    C: Adam cannot bring forth evil.

    So, by your chain, the question would be who brought forth evil.
    Your question of "what corrupted Adam" follows from

    A: Evil comes from corrupted humans
    B: Adam brought forth evil
    C: Adam was corrupted

    Now, I give up, what corrupted Adam?
     
  20. Winman

    Winman Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2009
    Messages:
    14,768
    Likes Received:
    2
    I see what you are saying, a man who has never sinned does not require salvation, which is to be "saved".

    This was what I saw in Luke 15;

    Luk 15:7 I say unto you, that likewise joy shall be in heaven over one sinner that repenteth, more than over ninety and nine just persons, which need no repentance.

    When the Pharisees criticized Jesus for keeping company and eating with sinners, Jesus told the parable of a shepherd who originally had 100 sheep. One went astray and became lost. He searched for it and recovered it, then rejoiced more over this one lost sheep than the 99 who never went out and became lost and required no repentance.

    Who are these 99 persons who need no repentance? This cannot possibly be the Pharisees as many teach. Jesus could not be saying they were sinless and required no repentance.

    Jesus also showed these terrible "sinners" at first belonged to God and were of great value to him. The Pharisees despised these sinners as in the parable of the publican and the Pharisee.

    Then Jesus told of a woman who had 10 pieces of silver, one became lost, she searched and recovered it, and rejoiced over this one lost coin.

    But who are the 9 silver coins that were never lost? This cannot be the Pharisees.

    Then Jesus told of the prodigal son. He was not originally lost, but at home with his father. He decided to leave his home of his own free will and went out and became lost in sin, he joined himself to a citizen of that far country (Satan, I believe). When he repented and returned home, his father twice said he was alive AGAIN, which would be impossible if men are born lost.

    But then we are told of the elder brother who NEVER left home, and never transgressed his father's commandment at any time. The father did not correct the elder son, but called him "Son" and said that he was "ever with me".

    So, who are the 99 that need no repentance? Who are the 9 silver pieces that were never lost? Who is the elder son who never left home or transgressed his father's commandments at any time?

    The only possible answer in my opinion is that this is speaking of little children who died before they could ever commit sin. Romans 9:11 clearly shows us that neither Esau nor Jacob had committed sin while they were in their mother's womb. If they had died in this state, they would need no repentance because they had never sinned.

    There have been many billions of children who have died before birth or when they were very young, this could easily be the 99 sheep who were never lost, the 9 coins that were never lost, or the elder son who was never lost.

    Folks read this parable, but they overlook the details. Jesus did not mention the 99 sheep, the 9 coins, and the elder son without reason. We should study to find out who these persons are.
     
    #40 Winman, Aug 22, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 22, 2012
Loading...