Internet Theologian
Well-Known Member
The OP describes it thoroughly, it is seen in the things it preaches. The list is extensive enough that anyone can see it unless they wish to display a pretense of ignorance.But what is this so-called "casual gospel"?
The OP refuses to define it. It gives a general description but no specifics.
Some here think that the author is speaking of those who believe in dispensationalism.
As if their guilty conscience were the fault of the OP, right?
Nothing in the OP speaks of nor does it address Dispensationalism. However, I cannot help those who have a guilty conscience that may give itself away. Perhaps said dispy's preach the things contained therein themselves? If the shoe fits, wear it.
Do all dispensationalists preach a casual gospel? Is that what the author of the OP is inferring?
Is he speaking of Joel Osteen? Unless he defines who he is speaking of, his OP is just hearsay.
If you've not heard the things in the OP taught, you must live under a rock, and are in denial. Names are unnecessary when such common knowledge of things expressed are rampant. Several others laid claim to being aware of these things. You know this yourself, but it if you play your game you can make pretense as if you're not in denial.
Now, which of the things listed do you not preach yourself?
Here is a starting place for you: Concerning salvation do you preach repentance as necessary or unnecessary?
Address that and then you'll actually be contributing to the thread.
Last edited: