Hello Darrell,
I wonder if it would be better to open a new thread on 'Reconciliation' rather than using this one which is supposed to be about 'Substitution.'
Reconciliation pre-supposes an estrangement between two parties. There will usually be an aggrieved party and an offending party, and reconciliation will involve the aggrieved party being propitiated, and the offending party coming to repentance.
The real question is soteriology is not how guilty men and women may be brought to repentance, but how an offended God may be conciliated. 'God is a just judge; and God is angry with sinners every day' (Psalm 7:11). 'Your iniquities have separated you from your God, and your sins have hidden His face from you' (Isaiah 59:2). The broken law stands between men and God; how can God be 'just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus' (Romans 3:26)?
2 Samuel 14:14 is a great verse to preach the Gospel from! I highly recommend it. You can contrast the wrong way to do reconciliation with the right way, namely God's way.
Philemon is another great way to look at reconciliation and preach the Gospel. You have a wronged party (Philemon) and an offending party (Onesimus). You have a mediator (Paul) who brings the two sides together by acting as surety for Onesimus. 'But if he has wronged you, or owes anything, put that on my account.......I will repay' (Philemon 18-19).
I leave it to you whether to open another thread.
No, I won't open another thread, but thanks for the invite. Going to have to leave here soon again, because I am spending time I don't have, so I will just deal with the ongoing discussions I see as profitable.
I will just address your post on one point, then I will bow out of this thread:
Reconciliation pre-supposes an estrangement between two parties. There will usually be an aggrieved party and an offending party, and reconciliation will involve the aggrieved party being propitiated, and the offending party coming to repentance.
The "estrangement" actually has another pre-supposition I'm wondering if you are fully contemplating: that there was a previous relationship from which the two parties become estranged. The lack of relationship men are born into with God does not echo the estrangement of Philemon and Onesimus. In that relationship there was a master slave relationship, not so with men when they are born into the world. The "reconciliation goes back to the relationship shared between God and His creation, Adam, which was lost.
Secondly, on this point, and I am not trying to be offensive here, I think you minimalize the Gospel by implying that repentance contributes to the salvation of the individual. That repentance, in my view, is just one of the several things God effects, rather than man patting himself on the back and saying "I repented, thus I was saved."
Don't take that the wrong way, it is just worded to illustrate why I disagree with this in relation to your statement.
The truth is that salvation, as a whole, is wholly the Work of Holy God. The debate between Arminians and Calvinists could end, after so many centuries, if they would simply acknowledge that man plays no part in salvation, but that he is indebted wholly to the intervention of God. To illustrate, consider this scenario: you are sleepwalking, walk into a lake, and in your dream you are an Olympic swimmer winning the gold. Suddenly you hear a voice saying "wake up, wake up! You're drowning!" You come to your senses, understand your condition, and desperately grab the hand of the one calling to you.
Do you get out of the water and say "I repented of my actions?" No, that's not even a question, you simply acknowledge that your condition was one in which you were dying, and apart from that intervention you would have...died.
So too with repentance, God creates that response simply by awakening us, that is, enlightening us to our condition. Repentance is a given because before that repentance occurs there is the recognition of the reality of the peril you are in.
Now, we go back to salvation, and again we recognize that we do not contribute the first element which actually saves us. God does.
Now we go back to reconciliation, and we recognize that it is God Who does the reconciling...alone. Not because we did something that merited being reconciled, but because He chose to save us.
Hope that makes sense, brother, and that is my last post in this thread. As I said before, I may be wrong, but you two are closer than I think either of you care to admit.
God bless.