Hydroplate Theory

It is best to express opinions as such, rather than as some statement of fact. You would have neither science not bible to back that opinion.

 

I assume the flood was near the KT layer era. The ice age was nowhere near that time.

 

Well, I assume that after the flood nature changed probably in the days of Peleg. I assume the continents quickly moved at that time, not in the flood year. I assume that near the end of the rapid move the world was entering into this current nature, so that a lot of heat was produced. That means volcanoes and etc.

This leaves plenty of time for animals to rapidly evolve before the continents separated.

 

That may be one possible cause. I don't think we could say that has to be the reason a volcano happens. The heat comes from deep under the earth. So what the weather is like topside seems to be of limited import. Now if continents rapidly moved apart, that would generate some heat. It also would leave heat deep under the earth at least in hot spots one suspects. The present physics would probably mean too much heat would happen from such a rapid movement of plates. In the former different nature that is not also true.

"The Deccan Traps began forming 66.25 million years ago, at the end of the Cretaceous period. The bulk of the volcanic eruption occurred at the Western Ghats some 66 million years ago."

deccan traps type of volcano - Google Search



Most volcanoes apparently are far older than the ice age also.

Not sure how you think you could say they were mostly flood caused near the ice age?

 

That is the flood geology scenario, where they try to blame everything on the year of the flood. Those folks usually also try to say most geologic column layers were laid down then, and most fossils come from then, oil...etc etc.
As I said it is an effort to try and explain the flood using modern nature and laws. I also do not know that the water for the flood came from the ocean ridge area as you think. Yes I can see that that area was probably where the slide or move started. But there is no need for water jets there.

Again, you use modern nature to try to explain how it 'must have' happened. There are many many issues and evidences that all need to be addressed. How about the fossil record? The migration of animals after the ark landed? The shallow seas that existed before any flood? Mountain building? Where the flood waters went? How animals were fed on the ark and after landing. How the long lifespans ceased to exist any more suddenly? Where does the heat under the earth come from? (science says the big bang and subsequent formation of planets etc...which never happened). How could water rise up through rock to water the earth?

Etc

Right off the bat the video claims "flood rocks contained" ash, and volcanic rock etc etc. That means they place the flood recently in the geo column. So where did all the stuff in the Cambrian layer and other layers come from?

 

No! Where did the 700 years come from? What proof is there the flood was at the time of the ice age? As I said, my opinion is that the flood was 70,000,000 years ago (science time) which equals about 4500 actual real years ago.

 

So..can you answer those questions? Did ice come from a woman's womb? What is the frost of heaven? Are we supposed to say that the ice at the poles on earth is now a frost of heaven? Should we define the words 'the waters' to mean the year of the flood?

 

Maybe. But they don't know. We cannot infer that Job lived in the ice age and that this was caused by the flood year.

 

Your false allegations show a lack of understanding. Yes, evolution was rapid in the former nature it seems, and something God created. It started with the kinds. Unless you want to claim that every creature living and that ever lived was a created kind?

By the way, not sure how anyone can reject creationist science!? I hope you don't think the old lame duck of flood geology is creation science!? Ha. Trying to attribute the fossils and layers and all things to one year of history is actually not any sort of science FYI.

 

Nor understood...so?

Claiming it was from the flood is easy I guess. Now you need to find some reason.

?? Plates move, the issue is how fast.

Word salad.

There was a lot of hot rock, yes. No at the same time as the ice age for the most part though I suspect. Since you claim the flood caused the ice age you are in hot water here.

Yes there is ash in some layers...so? Your flood at the time of the ice age simply is not a serious claim.