1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured The Nature of the Church, OT and NT

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by John of Japan, Sep 19, 2018.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,633
    Likes Received:
    1,832
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Well, since that is all future, I don't worry about it.

    I like the term "the body of Christ," which occurs four times, arguably about a local church all four times:

    Ro 7:4 Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law by the body of Christ; that ye should be married to another, [even] to him who is raised from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit unto God.
    1Co 10:16 The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ?
    1Co 12:27 Now ye are the body of Christ, and members in particular.
    Eph 4:12 For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ:
     
  2. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,633
    Likes Received:
    1,832
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You mention the "early Greek City states," and that is legitimate for classical Greek. By the 1st century AD, since Rome ruled the Greek cities and the term "called out" no longer necessarily described the city ruling body.

    The Liddell and Scott classical lexicon says: "an assembly of the citizens regularly summoned, the legislative assembly, Thuc., etc."
     
  3. loDebar

    loDebar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2018
    Messages:
    2,913
    Likes Received:
    94
    Faith:
    Baptist
    no, We are called out , but not "assembled" as yet.

    The local church was not referred to until believes were in separate cities, when referring to a local group in the epistles.

    This is not the local church
    Eph 5:32
    This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church.

    Perhaps you are saying if the OT believers meeting was a church?


    It was a type of an assembly to come, as shown by Marriage supper of the Lamb or perhaps Yom Kippur

    OT saints will join us
     
  4. Squire Robertsson

    Squire Robertsson Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2000
    Messages:
    15,371
    Likes Received:
    2,405
    Faith:
    Baptist
    A good treatment of Dr. Weeks position of "local church only" is Edward H. Overby's The Meaning of Ecclesia in the New Testament. I found it on Amazon. However, since it's been long out of print it is a bit pricey for something that was 89 cents back in 1974.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. Squire Robertsson

    Squire Robertsson Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2000
    Messages:
    15,371
    Likes Received:
    2,405
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I quite understand that. My point was the word carries more meaning than the simplistic etymological ones put forth by some here. Words fall into and out of usage over the centuries.
     
  6. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,633
    Likes Received:
    1,832
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Well said.
     
  7. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,633
    Likes Received:
    1,832
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Not true. Christ laid out the structure of the local church in Matt. 16 & 18, then the first local church was in one city: Jerusalem (Acts 2).

    I beg your pardon? So the officers of the church in the context (4:11) were officers of the universal church but not the local church? That doesn't make sense. "A text taken out of context is a pretext."
    Only in a general sense, but not in the well-defined NT sense of an organized body of local believers.

    You lost me. I don't know what you mean here. (I assume you are talking to me here.)
     
  8. 1689Dave

    1689Dave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2018
    Messages:
    7,953
    Likes Received:
    708
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Ping group: Congregation of the Lord in the OT = Congregation of Jesus Christ = Church of Jesus Christ.
     
  9. loDebar

    loDebar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2018
    Messages:
    2,913
    Likes Received:
    94
    Faith:
    Baptist
    sorry John,
    let me be clear, it was a universal church that had a local residence in Jerusalem and then specifically local churches in the epistles and first part of Revelation but not all usages
    Jesus was referring to a universal church of believers in the Gospels.

    Jesus was dealing with the world through local churches.

    Was an OT saint part of a NT local church?, no, but both are part of the Universal church of believers, the body of Christ.

    The complete body of believers has not been assembled yet but will be as the Marriage Supper of the Lamb
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. loDebar

    loDebar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2018
    Messages:
    2,913
    Likes Received:
    94
    Faith:
    Baptist
    yes, Psalms 2:22 and Hebrews 2:12

    but were all of the OT congregation righteous?
     
  11. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,633
    Likes Received:
    1,832
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Jesus could be referring to a universal church of believers in Matt. 16; I'll grant that. However, not in Matt. 18, where:

    1. Other individuals are mentioned who might assist in reconciliation in a local setting.
    2. The church is specifically said to be meeting in a location (gathered together, v. 20)

    This I will accept.
     
  12. 1689Dave

    1689Dave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2018
    Messages:
    7,953
    Likes Received:
    708
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It was a visible institutional State/Church with a mix of believers and non believers. The same way the Reformed view their institutional churches. But when Jesus abolished circumcision on the cross, nothing remained to make unbelievers Physical members of Israel, or physical Jews for that matter. The New Covenant Church is a continuation of the spiritual segment of the Old Testament Church.
     
  13. loDebar

    loDebar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2018
    Messages:
    2,913
    Likes Received:
    94
    Faith:
    Baptist
    no, the Church is the body of Believers,
    Physical membership in Israel did not make one a believer, ie, Eli the priests sons and all the kings "who did evil in the sight of the Lord"
     
  14. 1689Dave

    1689Dave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2018
    Messages:
    7,953
    Likes Received:
    708
    Faith:
    Baptist
    As I said, it was a visible institutional church/state as in the Reformation. Believers (saved) unbelievers (lost).
     
  15. loDebar

    loDebar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2018
    Messages:
    2,913
    Likes Received:
    94
    Faith:
    Baptist
    ahh, yes two or three , a local church but all local churches, real believers, are part of the universal church individually
     
    • Like Like x 1
  16. loDebar

    loDebar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2018
    Messages:
    2,913
    Likes Received:
    94
    Faith:
    Baptist
    unbelievers are not part of the body of Christ, usually when referring to a church we are referring to the body of Christ not the unbelievers we might share membership
     
  17. 1689Dave

    1689Dave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2018
    Messages:
    7,953
    Likes Received:
    708
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Church = assembly of whoever assembles. When Jesus abolished circumcision, he limited his assembly to believers only.
     
  18. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,633
    Likes Received:
    1,832
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Another proof that the church did not exist in the OT is that the NT metaphors for the church all point to Christ. Since the incarnation had not happened yet in the OT, the church of Jesus Christ (not Moses or Abraham or David) also could not exist in the OT.

    1. It is His body, and He is the head (Eph. 5:23, Col. 1:18 & 25).
    2. It is a building, with Christ as the cornerstone (Ac 4:11, Eph 2:19—22,
    1 Pe 2:6-7).
    3. It is the bride of Christ (Eph. 5:24-28).

    Without Christ earth in the incarnation, the church could not exist. It is for His glory, not that of any OT character: "Unto him be glory in the church by Christ Jesus throughout all ages, world without end. Amen" (Eph. 3:21).
     
    • Like Like x 1
  19. loDebar

    loDebar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2018
    Messages:
    2,913
    Likes Received:
    94
    Faith:
    Baptist

    Clarify your position, Will David be in Heaven?
     
  20. 1689Dave

    1689Dave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2018
    Messages:
    7,953
    Likes Received:
    708
    Faith:
    Baptist
    “Now I desire to remind you (even though you have been fully informed of these facts once for all) that Jesus, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, later destroyed those who did not believe.” (Jude 5)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...