37818
Well-Known Member
On both sides of the isle, each person who thinks they disagree with an opposing view needs to make clear the truth one believes.
I agree with "Total deprivity." Why? Because the word of God explicitly states none understand and seek God, Romans 3:11 (Psalms 14:2).
I disagree with "Unconditional election." Because the election is God's and is wholly to be unmerited by those He chooses (James 2:5, Ephesians 2:8-9).
Now I disagree with "Limited atonement." It should be noted, John Owen's book thourghly defends that position, I disagree with, in his book, Death of Death in the Death of Christ. He answers most all of the objections to that view.
Truth should not be denied. But needs to be defended.
I agree with "Total deprivity." Why? Because the word of God explicitly states none understand and seek God, Romans 3:11 (Psalms 14:2).
I disagree with "Unconditional election." Because the election is God's and is wholly to be unmerited by those He chooses (James 2:5, Ephesians 2:8-9).
Now I disagree with "Limited atonement." It should be noted, John Owen's book thourghly defends that position, I disagree with, in his book, Death of Death in the Death of Christ. He answers most all of the objections to that view.
Truth should not be denied. But needs to be defended.