• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Non-physical Humanity (was Millennium Thread)

Aaron

Member
Site Supporter
I think "non-earthy" would be a better term than "non-physical," which is what Paul means by "spiritual body" He said so himself. Our bodies will be raised no longer comprised of the dust of the earth.
 

Scripture More Accurately

Well-Known Member
Claiming that Jesus now lives in a non-physical spiritual body has many important ramifications. The Spirit revealed that the beast and the false prophet will be cast alive into the lake of fire:

Rev. 19:20 And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.

These human beings will be cast into that place in their physical bodies.

A thousand years later, the devil will be cast into that same place, and the beast and the false prophet will still be alive in torment there:

Rev. 20:10 And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented [plural verb] day and night for ever and ever.

If one were to deny that physical bodies, such as those of the beast and the false prophet, can exist in a "spiritual" realm, such as heaven or the lake of fire, one would deny what the Bible says about the eternal conscious torment of the wicked.

Rev. 14:9 And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand,

10 The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb:

11 And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name.

I wonder if those who are advocating that Jesus now lives in a "spiritual, non-physical" body also deny this key doctrine that wicked humans will be tormented eternally in their physical bodies.
 
Last edited:

Aaron

Member
Site Supporter
I've been waiting for someone to make an issue of the wounds in His hands and side.

Those are still visible, but no stripes on His back, no bald patches where His beard was torn out. No impression of the thorny crown. And nothing said about His feet.

[Edit: Oh, I see it now.]
 
Last edited:

George Antonios

Well-Known Member
Luk 24:36 And as they thus spake, Jesus himself stood in the midst of them, and saith unto them, Peace be unto you.
Luk 24:37 But they were terrified and affrighted, and supposed that they had seen a spirit.
Luk 24:38 And he said unto them, Why are ye troubled? and why do thoughts arise in your hearts?
Luk 24:39 Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have.
Luk 24:40 And when he had thus spoken, he shewed them his hands and his feet.
Luk 24:41 And while they yet believed not for joy, and wondered, he said unto them, Have ye here any meat?
Luk 24:42 And they gave him a piece of a broiled fish, and of an honeycomb.
Luk 24:43 And he took it, and did eat before them.

The scriptures tell us that we believers have been predestinated to inherit a Christ-like resurrection body (Eph.1:5/Rom.8:23; Rom.8:29; Php.3:21; 1Co.15:49; etc.).

So we will be as he was in the passage above: a physical body fully adapted to operate in both the physical and spiritual realms: it can be touched, it can eat, it has flesh and bones, and it can also walk through walls, appear and disappear, and change form (Mk.16:12), etc.
 
Last edited:

asterisktom

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Luk 24:36 And as they thus spake, Jesus himself stood in the midst of them, and saith unto them, Peace be unto you.
Luk 24:37 But they were terrified and affrighted, and supposed that they had seen a spirit.
Luk 24:38 And he said unto them, Why are ye troubled? and why do thoughts arise in your hearts?
Luk 24:39 Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have.
Luk 24:40 And when he had thus spoken, he shewed them his hands and his feet.
Luk 24:41 And while they yet believed not for joy, and wondered, he said unto them, Have ye here any meat?
Luk 24:42 And they gave him a piece of a broiled fish, and of an honeycomb.
Luk 24:43 And he took it, and did eat before them.

Open. Shut.

My advice to you is to read the thread through for understanding, not ammunition. Your verses are opening and shutting on some point I never raised.
 

George Antonios

Well-Known Member
My advice to you is to read the thread through for understanding, not ammunition. Your verses are opening and shutting on some point I never raised.

We've been through this before, though you may not recall.
Also, I wasn't necessarily just addressing you. There are many here.
Note that my post was a not in the "reply" format to the OP.
 

canadyjd

Well-Known Member
says who?

1 Cor 15:44, "It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body"
The point has already been made that Paul uses both words (for spirit and for physical body) to describe the resurrected body.

Thus, we lay the foundation for “glorified body”.

peace to you
 

asterisktom

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I was in a hurry, but felt I must say something about your false doctrine.

You want Scripture? There is a ton of Scripture promising a resurrection of the dead. A resurrection means a body. That is undisputable. You saying that Christ no longer has a physical body is false doctrine, just as bad as your full preterism, which denies a physical second coming of Christ (a fundamental of the faith). You are a modern Sadducee to deny that there is a physical resurrection our bodies or that Christ no longer has a physical body. (By the way, when and how did Christ lose His physical body? There's nothing in Scripture about such an event--you are making it up.)

Scriptures which teach a resurrection, and thus that we will have physical bodies:

Mt 22:28 Therefore in the resurrection whose wife shall she be of the seven? for they all had her.
Mt 22:30 For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven.
Lu 20:35 But they which shall be accounted worthy to obtain that world, and the resurrection from the dead, neither marry, nor are given in marriage:
Joh 5:29 And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.
Joh 11:24 Martha saith unto him, I know that he shall rise again in the resurrection at the last day.
Joh 11:25 Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live:
Ac 4:2 Being grieved that they taught the people, and preached through Jesus the resurrection from the dead.
Ac 17:32 And when they heard of the resurrection of the dead, some mocked: and others said, We will hear thee again of this [matter].
Ac 23:6 But when Paul perceived that the one part were Sadducees, and the other Pharisees, he cried out in the council, Men [and] brethren, I am a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee: of the hope and resurrection of the dead I am called in question.
Ac 23:8 For the Sadducees say that there is no resurrection, neither angel, nor spirit: but the Pharisees confess both.
Ac 24:15 And have hope toward God, which they themselves also allow, that there shall be a resurrection of the dead, both of the just and unjust.
Ac 24:21 Except it be for this one voice, that I cried standing among them, Touching the resurrection of the dead I am called in question by you this day.
Ro 6:5 For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also [in the likeness] of [his] resurrection:
1Co 15:13 But if there be no resurrection of the dead, then is Christ not risen:
1Co 15:21 For since by man [came] death, by man [came] also the resurrection of the dead.
1Co 15:42 So also [is] the resurrection of the dead. It is sown in corruption; it is raised in incorruption:
Php 3:11 If by any means I might attain unto the resurrection of the dead.
2Ti 2:18 Who concerning the truth have erred, saying that the resurrection is past already; and overthrow the faith of some.
Heb 11:35 Women received their dead raised to life again: and others were tortured, not accepting deliverance; that they might obtain a better resurrection:
1Pe 3:21 The like figure whereunto [even] baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ:
Re 20:5 But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This [is] the first resurrection.
Re 20:6 Blessed and holy [is] he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years.

I am not going to get into a cut and paste war with you, John. Also, every time I disagree with you you take it personally. This gets tiresome .

Sticking a fork in this one. It's done.
 

asterisktom

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
We've been through this before, though you may not recall.
Also, I wasn't necessarily just addressing you. There are many here.
Note that my post was a not in the "reply" format to the OP.

Okay. In that case I am sorry. I will try to be more careful.
 

George Antonios

Well-Known Member
I am not going to get into a cut and paste war with you, John. Also, every time I disagree with you you take it personally. This gets tiresome .

Sticking a fork in this one. It's done.

Although I agree with John on the doctrine, he does tend to go over-blown offended at slight pricks.
But he did provide you with scriptures.
 

Aaron

Member
Site Supporter
The point has already been made that Paul uses both words (for spirit and for physical body) to describe the resurrected body.

Thus, we lay the foundation for “glorified body”.

peace to you
Paul actually explained what he meant so that some heady translator couldn't rob his letter of its theology. Spiritual: not of this earth.
 

asterisktom

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The following is from a concurrent thread on pretty much the same subject. Because some here may not see that thread I will add it here:


In those verse, 1st Cor. 15:42-49, we read about the originators of the two classes, Adam and Christ. Adam “became a living being”. Christ, “a life-giving Spirit.” KJV unhelpfully provides “became“, which is not at all the point.

The following verses show a very important truth about our future natures.

Notice first the origins of these two persons:

“The first man is of the earth (ἐκ γῆς), earthy: the second man is the Lord from heaven (ἐξ οὐρανοῦ) .”

This passage is a continuation of verse 40: somata epigeia and somata epourania now become “ek ges” and “ex ouranou”. This preposition (ek, ex – the forms only differ because of euphonics) shows origin. Adam came from the earth, from the dust. This brings to mind the very passage from Genesis. The “Second Adam” came from heaven. Note: In both cases, the origins determine the essence of who these two are – and (v. 48) the essence of their “followers”.

Verse 49 says that “we shall [or “let us”] bear the image of the heavenly man” (the Second Adam, from heaven).

Now here is the application:

1.We shall be like Christ. 1st John 3:2
2.And what is Christ like – according to this passage? He is like He was before He came to Earth. He is spiritual.
3.Was Christ fleshly before he came here to Earth? No. He was pure Spirit.
4.We – according to this passage – will also be like Him.
Spiritual bodies. Spirits of just men made perfect, as we are told in Hebrews.

We cannot have part Adam’s essence (“dust”) and part Christ’s, seeing that we could not then “enter into the Kingdom of God”. “Dust” has to do with “flesh and blood”, not spirit.
 

George Antonios

Well-Known Member
The following is from a concurrent thread on pretty much the same subject. Because some here may not see that thread I will add it here:


In those verse, 1st Cor. 15:42-49, we read about the originators of the two classes, Adam and Christ. Adam “became a living being”. Christ, “a life-giving Spirit.” KJV unhelpfully provides “became“, which is not at all the point.

The following verses show a very important truth about our future natures.

Notice first the origins of these two persons:

“The first man is of the earth (ἐκ γῆς), earthy: the second man is the Lord from heaven (ἐξ οὐρανοῦ) .”

This passage is a continuation of verse 40: somata epigeia and somata epourania now become “ek ges” and “ex ouranou”. This preposition (ek, ex – the forms only differ because of euphonics) shows origin. Adam came from the earth, from the dust. This brings to mind the very passage from Genesis. The “Second Adam” came from heaven. Note: In both cases, the origins determine the essence of who these two are – and (v. 48) the essence of their “followers”.

Verse 49 says that “we shall [or “let us”] bear the image of the heavenly man” (the Second Adam, from heaven).

Now here is the application:

1.We shall be like Christ. 1st John 3:2
2.And what is Christ like – according to this passage? He is like He was before He came to Earth. He is spiritual.
3.Was Christ fleshly before he came here to Earth? No. He was pure Spirit.
4.We – according to this passage – will also be like Him.
Spiritual bodies. Spirits of just men made perfect, as we are told in Hebrews.

We cannot have part Adam’s essence (“dust”) and part Christ’s, seeing that we could not then “enter into the Kingdom of God”. “Dust” has to do with “flesh and blood”, not spirit.

Hence the reason for our flesh needing to be changed (not eradicated) and our blood being transformed into crystal clear water, like Christ's.
 

Aaron

Member
Site Supporter
Not of this earth does not automatically = non physical.
Physical does mean 'of this earth' though. That doesn't mean that spiritual could mean Martian soil. It means heavenly, as in the realm of heaven.

What you mean to say is, that it is substantial. I agree with that, and understand only that it is a substance quite apart from the substance that was planted.
 

George Antonios

Well-Known Member
Physical does mean 'of this earth' though. That doesn't mean that spiritual could mean Martian soil. It means heavenly, as in the realm of heaven.

What you mean to say is, that it is substantial. I agree with that, and understand only that it is a substance quite apart from the substance that was planted.

Christ is our example. It's the same body that went into the sepulchre that came out, but changed.
But as long we agree that it will be substantial flesh, and not just pure spirit, good.
 

1689Dave

Well-Known Member
My first problem with your theory is that there is no millennium. God cursed the Pharisees with a bare literal interpretation of the Kingdom and scripture. But Jesus taught the kingdom is spiritual and can only be seen by the born-again. This means all the kingdom prophecies are symbols of spiritual realities. If you can get that straight, the rest goes away allowing for time better spent on biblical themes.
 
Top