No offence taken.-just kidding Aaron.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
No offence taken.-just kidding Aaron.
This is from the OP
Note what Aaron said here. He is saying that the death of Christ Jesus saves us, this is wrong. The death of Christ Jesus reconciled us with the Father. The atonement covered all sins, but if a person does not trust in the Son then they are still in their sin they are not saved. Paul is clear when he says:
Rom 5:10 For if when we were enemies
we were reconciled to God through the death of His Son, much more,
having been reconciled,
we shall be saved by His life.
We are not saved because the Son died, it is because the Son lives.
1Co_15:17 And if Christ is not risen, your faith is futile; you are still in your sins!
The OP has it wrong.
"Salvation "touches the whole human race" as well as does Reconciliation. That Reconciliation is, as the OP states, salvation itself. We cannot separate the two, having one reconciled and another saved. Just as we can't have one saved and not born again."
Read Post # 16. If you maintain that what Aaron has said re reconciliation and salvation is correct then you are holding to universalism. He has people reconciled/saved at the atonement. Actually for the calvinist it is only the elect that are included in that group and the rest of humanity is damned.
Joh 3:17 For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved.
I have always taken it to be that only those that believe will be saved. As we see in the next verse those that do not believe are condemned because of that decision.
I know!It was just humor, lol.
God bless.
1 Corinthians 7:11 But and if she depart, let her remain unmarried, or be reconciled to her husband: and let not the husband put away his wife.
What does it mean that a husband a wife are reconciled, but that they are restored to union?
Will @Silverhair and @JonC deny that union with Christ is salvation?
Union with Christ is salvation. But the question is, when do we have union with Christ Jesus? Is it at the cross or is it when we trust in Christ Jesus for our salvation?
1 Corinthians 7:11 But and if she depart, let her remain unmarried, or be reconciled to her husband: and let not the husband put away his wife.
What does it mean that a husband a wife are reconciled, but that they are restored to union?
Where this would break down is that there is no prior relationship between the unbeliever and God when men are reconciled.
The point is the meaning of reconciliation. It means brought back into union.Union with Christ is salvation. But the question is, when do we have union with Christ Jesus? Is it at the cross or is it when we trust in Christ Jesus for our salvation?
The Righteousness of God Through Faith
Rom 3:21 But now the righteousness of God apart from the law is revealed, being witnessed by the Law and the Prophets,
Rom 3:22 even the righteousness of God, through faith in Jesus Christ, to all and on all who believe. For there is no difference;
Rom 3:23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,
Rom 3:24 being justified freely by His grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus,
Rom 3:25 whom God set forth as a propitiation by His blood, through faith, to demonstrate His righteousness, because in His forbearance God had passed over the sins that were previously committed,
Rom 3:26 to demonstrate at the present time His righteousness, that He might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus.
What is the gift of God?
Rom 6:23 For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.
How and why are we found to be in Christ?
Eph 2:8 For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God,
You are being disingenuous in your use of 1Co 7:11 to support your view when there is clear scripture that you ignore. I really do expect more of you than this.
The question I would ask is this: do you think that free will is an inherent ability in the natural man, or are you speaking of free will exercised under the ministry of the Holy Ghost?
The natural man, according to Paul, doesn't have the ability to recognize or receive the spiritual things of God. However, I will agree that it is the person who makes the decision in that response to His ministry. He convicts of sin, and the person responds one way or another. That is not the free will that teaches men have the ability within themselves, apart from God, to hear the Gospel and respond. Their proclivity will be to reject the Gospel.
We were in Adam before he fell.
No, it's real. We were in his loins. Like Levi was in the loins of Abraham when he paid tithes to Melchizedek.That is figurative.
I John 4:19 We love God because He first loved us. This is clear indication but not a direct statement that implies we would not have the ability to come to God if He did not first love us. This love is not only expressed in the cross and resurrection but in the giving of His word (Romans 10:9-17). Our ability to come to God comes directly from His word as scripture directly tells us. The preacher of the word (those who share the gospel) are sent by God. Both His word and His preacher are His acting grace and making man aware of the need to come to Him.
I'm sorry but your understanding of that passage (I Corinthians 2:14) has been, unfortunately, taken out of context and then inappropriately applied to lost people in an errant way. If you read all of chapters 1-3 you gain the appropriate context. Paul when talking to believers (in chapter 1) was offering correction on their division which Paul said is worldly thinking. He goes on to compare worldly thinking to spiritual thinking. This worldly thinking can be applied to both believers and non believers. Verse 14 of chapter 2 can therefore be applied to believers and non believers. Further support of this can be found in verse 1 of chapter 3 where he says "But I, brothers, could not address you as spiritual people, but as people of the flesh, as infants in Christ." the words "flesh" and "natural" are synonyms and can be used interchangeably.
So it is the God's revelation of Himself both General revelation (Romans 1:18-20) and special revelation (the word of God Romans 10:17).
No, it's real. We were in his loins. Like Levi was in the loins of Abraham when he paid tithes to Melchizedek.
You and I were created on the Sixth Day, bud. It is written God ended His work on the Seventh.
Creation is not still going on.
Darrell C said: ↑
Where this would break down is that there is no prior relationship between the unbeliever and God when men are reconciled.
We were in Adam before he fell.
I don't view Reconciliation to be accomplished unless one actually responds to the Gospel. I don't see reconciliation as applying to those who reject the Gospel.
That the Atonement covers all sin does not mean all receive and benefit from the Atonement. It is necessary to respond to the Gospel as God ministers in the heart. If one does turn to Christ it is then that the righteousness of Christ is imputed to the unsaved.
The Old Testament Saint had to respond in belief to that which God revealed to them as well, but they died still awaiting Reconciliation through the Atonement. They were justified in a temporal context, but that justification was not the imputation of Christ's righteousness, thus they "went to be with their fathers" in Hades, awaiting the Atonement.
The promise of remission of sin in an eternal context (everlasting) would not be fulfilled until Christ actually died. We see the promise given:
Hebrews 10:15-18 King James Version
15 Whereof the Holy Ghost also is a witness to us: for after that he had said before,
16 This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days, saith the Lord, I will put my laws into their hearts, and in their minds will I write them;
17 And their sins and iniquities will I remember no more.
18 Now where remission of these is, there is no more offering for sin.
But a promise is only a promise until it is fulfilled. That promise could not be fulfilled until the New Covenant was inaugurated by the Blood of Christ:
Hebrews 9:12-17 King James Version
12 Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us.
13 For if the blood of bulls and of goats, and the ashes of an heifer sprinkling the unclean, sanctifieth to the purifying of the flesh:
14 How much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God, purge your conscience from dead works to serve the living God?
15 And for this cause he is the mediator of the new testament, that by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the first testament, they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance.
16 For where a testament is, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator.
17 For a testament is of force after men are dead: otherwise it is of no strength at all while the testator liveth.
The New Covenant had no strength, and was not in force until Christ died. Eternal Redemption was obtained through His death, not simply Reconciliation.
Reconciliation is what God does when He saves. It is a term used to describe salvation, rather than a distinct portion of salvation. Reconciliation, Atonement, Justification and Union with God happen within salvation. You can't one without the other/s.
Just so I understand your position, do you believe reconciliation applies to all men?
God bless.