KenH
Well-Known Member
The Bible is all over the place on this
The Bible is NOT "all over the place" on anything.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
The Bible is all over the place on this
Calvinists are not monolithic in how they view this. Calvin was strong on predestination of all events as a general philosophy but if you look at his commentary he believed John 3:16 the word "world" referred to all and everyone, not just the elect. There is much debate about what he believed on limited atonement with most believing he believed Christ died for everyone. In addition, in his commentary on Ephesians 2:8-9 it is not clear what he believed as far as faith being a "gift".But predestination as the Calvinists view it, not a chance!
Of course it is. That's why men try to develop "systematic theologies" to organize it. The fact that some of you guys try to bend everything to match your own presupposition and then declare everything all set is your problem. I have to go for now but will be back later. Look. You, as a hyper-Calvinist are consistent. But you ignore other passages. Thus you guys don't like Owen, Edwards, and other Calvinists because they tried to achieve some balance in these doctrines.The Bible is NOT "all over the place" on anything.
Free willers of all types are who I am referring to.
But you ignore other passages.
Of course it is.
Calvinists are not monolithic in how they view this. Calvin was strong on predestination of all events as a general philosophy but if you look at his commentary he believed John 3:16 the word "world" referred to all and everyone, not just the elect. There is much debate about what he believed on limited atonement with most believing he believed Christ died for everyone. In addition, in his commentary on Ephesians 2:8-9 it is not clear what he believed as far as faith being a "gift".
There is good evidence that modern Calvinism as explained by James White and the internet guys is way more deterministic than the Reformers taught it as far as salvation. Further back, as a general philosophy, Calvin and the early reformed theologians were very deterministic and they are arguing nowadays about where this came from. My post #9 above is not a joke. I can give you the reference if you want to buy the book and have an extra 40 bucks lying around.
Thus you guys don't like Owen, Edwards, and other Calvinists because they tried to achieve some balance in these doctrines.
But I'll have to say, I sure wouldn't want to face God with double predestination hanging around my neck.
I am not afraid. 2 Timothy 1:12 For I know whom I have believed, and am persuaded that he is able to keep that which I have committed unto him against that day.
But we will answer for we have done, whether it be good or bad, according to Paul.
Nope. The elect's sins have all been judged in Christ. The elect's reward is Christ.
This teaching of mercenary actions for "greater rewards" is a false teaching. What would anyone possibly want more than to have Christ as one's reward? What are you after? A bigger mansion? A place closer to the throne of God?
This whole mercenary teaching sounds like economic capitalism run amuck.
2 Timothy 1:12 For I know whom I have believed, and am persuaded that he is able to keep that which I have committed unto him against that day.
Amen! Maybe someday @Charlie24 will have that sort of faith and accept the truth of eternal security of God's children. It seems this is a major gripe of his with 'Calvinism'. He doesn't like it for some reason.
That's rather foolish, don't you think?
1 Corinthians 1:25 The foolishness of God is wiser than men.
1 Corinthians 1:27-31 God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty; and base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are: that no flesh should glory in his presence. But of him are ye in Christ Jesus, who of God is made unto us wisdom, and righteousness, and sanctification, and redemption: that, according as it is written, He that glorieth, let him glory in the Lord.
Are you not able to speak for yourself?
So you want me to speak, instead of God's Word? Seems like a strange question on this type of message board.
That's rather foolish, don't you think?
Ken. Didn't mean any offense. In past posts I thought you had been among those who complained when I put up writings from Owen and Edwards freely offering the gospel to people on the condition they believe. But maybe I was thinking of someone else. Also, because I like those guys, and other Puritans - they always put a high importance on living the Christian life and had zero comfort to offer to someone who didn't, regardless of their feelings on predestination and election. They had a strong emphasis on examining yourself - with the obvious idea that you could do so, and therefore you could make a difference by what you discovered and did.You don't know whom I like or don't like. I have not published a list.