Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
The fruit of the Spirit comes when the Spirit does His Saving work Titus 3:5
4 But after that the kindness and love of God our Saviour toward man appeared,
5 Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost;
6 Which he shed on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Saviour;
Then when regenerated and renewed by the Spirit, Faith is the fruit.
lol, we will see about that on the Day of Judgment my friend, and find out who promotes a man made philosophy.
@Eternally Grateful
Thats false, a unbeliever first needs a new regenerated heart to understand the gospel and bring forth fruit, like faith Matt 13:23
23 But he that received seed into the good ground is he that heareth the word, and understandeth it; which also beareth fruit, and bringeth forth, some an hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty.
Non of the other heaers are said to have heard and understandeth, but the good ground or heart hearer. The good ground/heart represents the new regenerated heart, otherwise mans natural heart is evil
BF you want to have people saved/regenerated before they believe.
We will see on that dayBF your philosophy comes from the 4th century so it is factually a man-made one.
Before one can believe with spiritual understanding, they first need to be made unto good ground. Thats salvation. Man in his unregenerated condition and heart is sinful, bad ground.BF you are reading into the text what you need to find. The bible holds man responsible for the response he makes to the gospel message.
You have made God responsible as according to you He has to regenerate the person before they can believe. If that were truth then why is it that not everyone believes since His desire is for all to come to repentance. Also if He has to regenerate the person first then for those that are not regenerated have the best excuse possible for not believing, so why are they condemned for doing just what God determined for them to do.
Just a brief note on Romans 3:11-13:
Romans 3:11-13 NASB
THERE IS NONE WHO UNDERSTANDS,
THERE IS NONE WHO SEEKS OUT GOD;
THEY HAVE ALL TURNED ASIDE, TOGETHER THEY HAVE BECOME CORRUPT;
THERE IS NONE WHO DOES GOOD,
THERE IS NOT EVEN ONE.”
“THEIR THROAT IS AN OPEN GRAVE,
WITH THEIR TONGUES THEY KEEP DECEIVING,”
“THE VENOM OF ASPS IS UNDER THEIR LIPS”;
While some uncertainty may exist, Paul seems to be using a quote or paraphrase of the Old Testament (Psalm 14?) and repurposes it under inspiration, to prove we are all sinners because at least part of the time, we do not understand, we do not seek God, we all have turned aside, as we are all corrupt, and we do not do good all the time, and this is true of everyone. Sometimes we do not watch our words, sometimes we deceive, and we thus poison those we influence.
False teachers twist this passage and falsely claim it says no one ever understands, no one ever seeks out God, we always turn aside from the will of God, and we never actually do good. This false claim is absurd on its face. People sometimes will to be saved, Romans 9:16. People sometimes seek God, Romans 9:30-33. The rich young ruler was seeking eternal life, but was unwilling to turn loose of his worldly treasure.
First what do you mean by theological consistency? Not a term I have seen batter around before.
Second You made a factual error in this comment "The common mind set of the Arminian view is that unless God causes it, He cannot be sovereign over it.,"
That is the C/R view as can be clearly seen in the WCF/LBCF. They are the ones that require God to determine all things and deny the actual free will of man.
As for your support of Compatibilism it does not describe biblical truths but it is the attempt of some to have it do so.
Compatibilism, in philosophy, [the C/R view] is the view that free will and determinism are compatible. It argues that even if all events are causally determined, including human actions, we can still have free will and be morally responsible for our choices. This perspective often involves redefining or reinterpreting what it means to have free will.
Compatibilism, despite what the name suggests, doesn’t reconcile free will and determinism. Compatibilism, at most, would explain why we feel like we’re free when we make our actions even though we’re determined. But it doesn’t actually let us affirm the two propositions; (A) Man is determined, and (B) Man is free. Why? Because on compatibilism, man still cannot choose between alternatives.
In other words you cannot choose anything except what you were determined {by God} to choose.
You can go to https://www.monergismDOTcom/topics/free-will/compatibilism if you think I have been unfair to that view.
Before one can believe with spiritual understanding, they first need to be made unto good ground. Thats salvation. Man in his unregenerated condition and heart is sinful, bad ground.
Study what good ground means by Jesus Matt 13:23
But he that received seed into the good ground is he that heareth the word, and understandeth it; which also beareth fruit, and bringeth forth, some an hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty
And remember man by nature his heart is deceitful and wicked Jer 17:9
9 The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?
Sure it does, you pay no attention to it, you caught up into arguing calvinismBF the bible does not support your faulty view. You are ignoring the truths found in the word of God so you can hold to your man-made religion.
Study what good ground means by Jesus Matt 13:23Sorry BF but you are wrong again. You have been shown the truth so you have no excuse.
That is a common problem that we can see in any number of religious views.Some people come to Scripture with preconceived ideas and try to smash those ideas into the text. I've seen it at both ends of the theological spectrum. They try to define the Bible by the system, instead of the other way around.
I would say that you have made a serious error in your thinking. It is not the Arminians but the C/R [Calvinist/Reformed] that fit the view you have given.it's common in Arminian circles to start with the idea that if God is sovereign over it, He determines it, then man cannot truly have free will because it must be coercion.
Free will is not claiming we are free from but that we are free to do something. In the biblical case we are free to choose to trust in or reject God.When you say free will, what are you claiming that we are free from and where does the Bible teach this?
God is sovereign and man has a God given free will so is morally responsible for the choices he makes and if that was how those of the C/R view treated the word "Compatibilism" it would not be a problem as it would then be scriptural.This is where I believe that you're mistaken. Compatibilism is not trying to solve the tension left in Scripture between mans moral responsibility and God's complete sovereignty over everything. It's only a theological term that recognizes both truths in Scripture. The Scripture that I provided, and the Biblical truths presented, were not trying to solve Biblical tensions, but were merely pointing to the fact that mans responsibility and God's sovereignty both exist very clearly in Scripture. Naturally (pun intended), humanism will always gnash it's teeth at God's sovereignty.
Sure it does, you pay no attention to it, you caught up into arguing calvinism
Study what good ground means by Jesus Matt 13:23
But he that received seed into the good ground is he that heareth the word, and understandeth it; which also beareth fruit, and bringeth forth, some an hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty
Whats the good ground represent ?
@SilverhairThat....
This thread is closed - feel free to start a new thread.Six hour warning
This thread will be closed no sooner than 1900 GMT - 3 pm EDT 17 Jul