Recent content by robycop3

Shawn, your insistence that the "Easter" goof is correct in the KJV's Acts 12:4 is correct, DESPITE its being proven incorrect right here shows you believe in what MEN told you instead of what GOD said, proves you need to study God's word fervently, with earnest prayer for understanding. Please...

...Except where it's NOT !

Even though it's been PROVEN to be IMperfect? My, my, you sure have swallowed Satan's KJVO myth.

No, it's NOT ! It has the same goofs & booboos as any other KJV (NOT"KJB") edition. Shoot, you can't even get by the "Easter" goof in Acts 12:4, let alone any other. Your KJVO myth is phony as a Ford Corvette.

No, Easter is NOT right. You've not offered one quark of PROOF that it IS.

Nupe ! You're simply wrong-THOROUGHLY PROVEN wrong.

For the sake of argument, let's say Easter DID exist when Luke wrote Acts. Now, why would Herod wait for it to conclude before turning Peter over to the Jews? And why did the Jews not protest Herod's delay? Remember, Herod was under Caesar's orders to PLEASE the Jews, and few things would...

Shawn, you're still beating the dead "Easter" horse for the false KJVO myth. There's simply no escaping the FACT that "Easter" in the KJV's Acts 12:4 is wrong! Now, it's been said that after the KJV scripts were finished, some prelates got hold of them & added the Easter goof before the KJV was...

You remind me of Hermann Goering, the Nazi Luftwaffe leader. He insisted the British could never bomb Berlin, but after a british plane was shot down after bombing Berlin, he was shown the remains of the plane with clear British markings, but he angrily insisted there were NO British aircraft...

Yeah, , 'WAY after the passover Luke was writing about ! It didn't exist when Luke wrote "Acts". In the KJV's Acts 12:4, it's a GOOF.

No, it's NOT. History proves it's not, & GOD shapes history.

No such thing as a "KJB". And the KJV is always right except where it's wrong.

The goof is "Easter" in Acts 12:4.