Brightfame52
Well-Known Member
You don't know how serious it is to reduce the Savior of sinners to a possible Savior.Read your bible BF.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
You don't know how serious it is to reduce the Savior of sinners to a possible Savior.Read your bible BF.
God makes salvation possible, then what actually saved a person since God comes short of the goal.Sorry BF but you can rant all you want but the truth is the truth. Only God saves but He only saves those the have freely trusted in Him.
That is something that you do not seem to be able to understand or accept.
You helped me this evening. I was leading a prayer meeting at my church and was looking for a Christmas-themed word to start the meeting.Yes Jesus makes salvation possible for all but only those that freely trust in Him will be saved.
If we just went by your view then we would have universal salvation as He was the propitiation for the whole world 1Jn 2:2 He Himself is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world.
Mar_16:16 Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned.
Act_2:21 And everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.’
Yes Jesus saves but if you leave out the condition of faith then you are preaching a false message.
You don't know how serious it is to reduce the Savior of sinners to a possible Savior.
You helped me this evening. I was leading a prayer meeting at my church and was looking for a Christmas-themed word to start the meeting.
1 Timothy 1:15 came to mind from our discussion. 'This is a faithful saying and worthy of all acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am chief.' He didn't come to offer salvation to anyone; He came to save. And the people He came to save are sinners. It's a faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptance; why won't you accept it?
This is a historically important verse because it was a catalyst for the Reformation in England. Thomas Bilney was a young Roman Catholic priest who was in great doubt about his salvation. He went through all the R.C. sacraments, plus pilgrimages and flagellation, but nothing helped him, mainly because he was never encouraged to read the Bible. In 1516, Desiderimus Erasmus published a new edition of the Greek N.T. with a Latin translation (Rome prohibited English translations). Bilney knew no Greek, but he did know Latin. He obtained a Latin Testament and began to read. When he reached 1 Tim. 1:15, his eyes were opened. He knew he was a sinner, but the text said that Christ had come to save sinners, and if Paul said he was chief of sinners, there must be hope for Bilney. He put his trust in Christ and began to tell other priests the Good News. He was responsible for the conversion of Hugh Latimer, who was very instrumental in the English Reformation. Bilney himself was burned at the stake in 1531 (and Latimer 20-odd years later), but by God's grace he had started something that brought hope for millions.
Now no one is saying that salvation is by grace but not by faith. Whenever I preach I call on people to trust in Christ. But Jesus Christ came into the world, not to offer anyone anything, but to save sinners, and He will save His people from their sins. Someone has rightly suggested that on the outside of the gate of heaven there is a sign saying, "Whoever will may enter." But when one enters and looks back at the inside of the gate he will read, "Chosen from the foundation of the world."
Yes, He shall save, not "He shall make salvation a possibility."Here's a nice Christmas quote for you.
Matthew 1:21. '....And you shall call His name JESUS, for He shall save His people from their sins.'
You are making unproved and demonstratively false claims. Anyone can contribute nothing with these posts.You making unproven claims. Peter writes about Christ blood redemption right here 1 Peter 1:18-19. Why would he change in his second epistle?
That's a serious claim against Christ the Savior.Can you calvinists be honest for once and not twist what people say.
God is the savior but only those that freely trust in Him will be saved.
I know that does not fit your false religion but it is biblical.
Is Peter double minded? He just wrote to the same people that Christ Blood redeemed them from a vain manner of life, that is false religion. He used a different Greek word. 1 Pet 1:18-19 so explain that.You are making unproved and demonstratively false claims. Anyone can contribute nothing with these posts.
For example you address redemption when the issue is ransom. Anyone can sidestep truth and post diversion.
Are you mentally challenged, 1 Peter 1:18 addresses "redemption" not "ransom." Unless you address that paying the price for the ransom only results in the release from bondage at the discretion the the one enforcing the bondage you are simply spiting in the wind.Is Peter double minded? He just wrote to the same people that Christ Blood redeemed them from a vain manner of life, that is false religion. He used a different Greek word. 1 Pet 1:18-19 so explain that.
Yes, He shall save, not "He shall make salvation a possibility."
Since the Jews are His people are all the Jews saved?
That's a serious claim against Christ the Savior.
His people are all of God's elect, chosen before the world began and given to Christ to be their Surety, from among both Jews and Gentiles. (Ephesians 1:3-4)
God foreknows all that will freely trust in Him
Insults. Peter specifically teaches about Christ Blood redemption in 1 Peter 1:18-19. Now why would he change in 2 Pet 2:1?Are you mentally challenged,
That He merely made salvation possible or potential. Who makes it actual then?What is the claim against Christ as savior BF?
Once again diversion because of the inability to address the topic.Insults. Peter specifically teaches about Christ Blood redemption in 1 Peter 1:18-19. Now why would he change in 2 Pet 2:1?
That He merely made salvation possible or potential. Who makes it actual then?
Well you have a problem.Once again diversion because of the inability to address the topic.
Only a mentally challenged person, with the total inability to tell the truth, would fail to address the difference between ransom and redemption.