Search results

If God was involved in the updating of archaic English in the pre-1611 English Bibles as updated in the 1611 KJV, God could also be involved in updating of archaic English in the 1611 KJV as updated in present-day standard English. Many verifiable facts from the Bishops’ Bible and other...

Peter Ruckman is not a scholar that I like. Facts concerning the reading of all preserved Greek NT manuscript copies would not be an opinion. The point of the post was not opinions. The point was the actual facts. All preserved Greek NT manuscript copies of the book of Revelation have the...

Edward Carnell maintained that “consistency is the first property of truth” (Introduction to Christian Apologetics, p. 67). Edward Carnell observed: “The test for truth is systematic consistency” (p. 63). Edward Carnell declared: “Without consistency, there is no truth. Truth is always...

Incorrect. Your quotation from David Otis Fuller claimed that some of them were imprisoned. Your own post proves that you made a false accusation against me. Did you not even read what you yourself had posted? Here is what you posted: "There have been many versions of the Holy Scriptures...

You do not prove that I twisted anything. You did not point out anything that I supposedly twisted. You fail to correct your false accusations. The statement in your own post from David Otis Fuller suggested concerning the committee who made the KJV that "some were imprisoned." The "some"...

Examples of this type of words may include the following: nephews (1 Tim. 5:4, Jud. 12:14, Job 18:19) used to mean grandchildren or direct descendants, carriages (Acts 21:15, 1 Sam. 17:22, Judges 18:21, Isaiah 10:28, Isaiah 64:1) used for baggage, let (2 Thess. 2:7, Rom. 1:13) used with the...

Your accusation is false. My effort is to present the truth concerning the KJV, my preferred English Bible translation. I make no attempt "to devour" the KJV as you falsely allege. You prove nothing "crooked" in my accurate information concerning the KJV translators and concerning King...

David Otis Fuller seems to have been misinformed concerning the KJV translators. While the persecution of Puritans was not as severe during part of the time of George Abbot, who had been a KJV translator, as Archbishop as it had been under Archbishop Richard Bancroft, it did not completely end...

Where is the evidence that the Church of England makers of the KJV "suffered for their faith"? Which of the KJV translators were actually imprisoned for their faith? If any of them suffered for their faith, they did not learn more that experience not to persecute others for their faith...

Does your post avoid and ignore the fact that the Church of England makers of the KJV borrowed many renderings from the 1582 Roman Catholic Rheims New Testament? First-hand testimony and evidence from one of the KJV translators would acknowledge or affirm the use of the 1582 Rheims NT in the...

The preserved words given by inspiration of God to the prophets and apostles remain the standard and authority for the making and trying of all Bible translations including the KJV.

KJV-only advocates can be deceived, and many of them are as they choose to believe claims for the KJV that are not true and since they may choose to believe misleading and non-true accusations against other English Bibles that are based on use of divers measures [double standards]. Several...

Made by Nick Sayers in Australia, "The King James Version 2023 Edition New Testament is a modernized rendition of the original King James Version in contemporary English while preserving the timeless meaning of the traditional text." KJV-only advocates do not seem to accept it.

Concerning Revelation 22:19 in his commentary on the book of Revelation, Peter Ruckman wrote: “All the new translations say ‘tree of life’ instead of ‘book of life.’ Again, the change is uncalled for, the Receptus reads ‘bibliou.’ “Tree of life’ is sheer conjecture. No alternate reading is given...

How do KJV-only advocates rationalize or excuse in their minds the improper, bogus, non-true attempt to associate the word of God in present standard English in the NKJV with the New World Translation of Jehovah's Witnesses? Is this use of the guilt-by-association fallacy?

All post-NT Bible translations including the KJV would be non-inspired since they are not made by a miracle of direct inspiration of God. The process of the giving of all Scripture by inspiration of God to the prophets and apostles ended with the completion of the New Testament.

Mark Ward observed that reading-level “tools measure a word’s complexity by syllable count, but that’s not a reliable way of judging whether a word can be understood” (Authorized, p. 54). Mark Ward also noted: “Reading-level analyses run by computers do not yield reliable or useful results when...

James Frye fails to prove his opinion to be true. The KJV is not the only Bible available today that comes from the Textus Receptus. English Bible translations such as the 1833 Webster’s Bible, the 1842 revision of the KJV by Baptists, the 1982 NKJV, the 1990 Modern King James Version, the...

This person's memory of an event over 20 years earlier is unreliable since he admits it is not "word for word correct" He is a biased KJV-only author with an axe to grind against the NKJV. Having read and studied the KJV over 50 years as a believer, my bias is in favor of the KJV.

Perhaps you described your own incorrect attitude towards the NKJV as you throw the baby out with the bathwater and dismiss the NKJV, as if it were The Reader's Digest version, but you did not describe my view of the KJV. You continue your improper use of the guilty-by-association fallacy...